Current Projects (Fall 2011)

completed projects are presented in my publications list.


SARCOMA
 

Our work over the past 7 years has culminated in a clinical trial, for which I am coordinating correlative sciences. The preclinical work has been supported by grants from the Terry Fox Foundation, the Canadian Cancer Society and CIHR. The Investigational New Drug trial (NCICCTG IND.200) of the agent SB939 is funded by the NCIC-Clinical Trials Group. This trial was open at multiple centres in Canada in spring 2011.
Working with a group of the top cancer researchers in British Columbia, we are employing next generation sequencing technologies to identify the causative molecular abnormalities of a group of rare, under-explored cancers, including several types of sarcomas. We feel the opportunity to identify the molecular cause of these diseases is particularly good, and if successful will lead quickly to new diagnostics and therapies. Funded by the Terry Fox Research Institute. We are grateful for support from our colleagues at several institutions including Toronto's University Health Network and the MD Anderson Cancer Center in helping us to assemble sufficient collections of some rare tumor types.
Building on our identification of a novel translocation that drives the oncogenesis of tenosynovial giant cell tumor we are developing models to test new targeted treatment options. We are also making a special effort to test leiomyosarcomas. Previously supported by the Sarcoma Foundation of America and the Cancer Research Society, this work is now supported by a full operating grant from the Canadian Institutes of Health Research.




BREAST CANCER

Following up on our work using the "big series" of 4000 cases from the Genetic Pathology Evaluation Centre, we can, with good accuracy, subtype breast cancer into Luminal A, Luminal B, HER2 and Basal subtype using immunohistochemistry and Nanostring technologies. We are applying this strategy to formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks supplied by the NCIC-Clinical Trials Group and in collaboration with the Danish Breast Cancer Group, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research and CALGB clinical trial cooperative groups. Multiple projects are underway, testing if this subtyping predicts response to cytotoxic drug, endocrine and radiation therapies. Supported by an unrestricted educational grant from sanofi-aventis Canada, collaborator funds from the Susan Komen Foundation and the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation.
Our group was part of the successful consortium (Washington University, University of Utah, UNC-Chapel Hill, and UBC) funded by the U.S. National Institute of Health to adapt molecular signatures of breast cancer for clinical use. We developed qRT-PCR and Nanostring nCounter-based assays identifying the intrinsic molecular portraits of breast cancer originally discovered using DNA microarrays. A panel of 50 genes (the PAM50 classifier) can do this on formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded standard and archival tissue specimens, and is currently being tested to identify how it can predict patient outcome and response to therapy. Originally funded by the U.S. National Institute of Health (Strategic Partnering to Evaluate Cancer Signatures), this work has now moved to a second developmental phase in partnership with Nanostring Technologies, including work done in partnership with US, Canadian and European groups.
My most cited paper to date presented a practical, easy and highly specific way to detect the clinically-important basal-like subtype of breast cancer. Drawing on the latest gene expression profiling data and on our tissue microarray validation resources, we are testing additional antibody biomarkers to see if we can develop an even more sensitive surrogate immunopanel, that retains specificity and remains easy to apply. Supported by my senior scholar grant from the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research and by the Canadian Breast Cancer Foundation, BC/Yukon Division.
Following an international workshop held at the Breakthrough Breast Cancer Research Centre in London, we have been entrusted to organize a multiinstitutional study of interobserver variability and specimen type-specific scoring methodology to address some unanswered questions about how to actually assay the best immunohistochemical marker of proliferation, Ki67. This biomarker has potential value in diagnosis, prognosis, prediciting the best anticancer drug, and monitoring the success of therapy for breast cancer. Supported by the North American Breast Cancer Group.



I'd be happy to discuss any of these topics with you!

torsten(nospam)@interchange.ubc.ca

Last modified 2011.12.27

Back to Torsten's home page.