![]()
The previous page considered ways to present magic squares and cubes (2-D and 3-D objects).
This page considers magic tesseracts (4-dimensional objects).
Historical representations Hendricks modern form The first tesseract
![]()
Historical representations
| In trying to visualize a tesseract, 2 types of drawings
have been used for many years. This one shows a small cube 'suspended'
inside a large cube and 'supported' by six distorted cubes.
This is the best illustration to show how each tesseract is 'bounded' by 8 cubes (6 of them are distorted). |
![]() |
| This drawing illustrates the second visualization (the
figure to the right). The drawing as a whole attempts to show how a hypercube may be 'dragged' through the dimensions to produce a hypercube illustration for each. i.e here we go from 0-dimension to 1, 2, 3, and finally arrive at the forth dimension. The numbers help to identify the corners. As an 'extra', I have arranged the numbers so that each square (and rhomboid) is perimeter magic. Remember that in these two cases, the rhomboids are actually distorted squares! In both examples, the drawing is obviously not suitable to display the numbers in the magic tesseract. Even for order-3, the lowest, there are 81 numbers to display. |
|
![]()
Hendricks modern form
In 1962, John R. Hendricks published a new method of drawing the magic
tesseract [1][2]. He did it in grand style by describing a 6-dimension magic
hypercube of order-3. This hypercube used the numbers from 1 to 729 (729 = 36)
and required 9 order-3 dimension 4 (tesseract) figures to display (a 6-D figure
was just too complicated to comprehend). Each tesseract sums on its own in 4 ways.
The fifth direction is found by jumping from tesseract to tesseract
horizontally, and the sixth direction by jumping vertically. The resulting
normal 6-dimensional magic hypercube sums to 1095 in at least 1490 ways (6m5
+ 32).
He also showed a 5-dimension order-3 magic hypercube. It required three order
3 tesseract diagrams. See this hypercube here.

He introduced the subject with figures 1, 2, and 3; showing an order 3 magic
square, magic cube, and magic tesseract. Notice that none of the three magic
figures are normalized. He came up with that idea (for cubes and
tesseracts) at a later date, when he realized that a system was required for
listing solutions in order. This tesseract is an aspect of index # 5.
The magic square has traditionally been illustrated with each number occupying a
2-dimensional 'cell', not as intersections of a 'grid' as suggested in Figure 1
(above). The magic cube was also shown that way at the start, but now is
normally shown with the numbers placed at grid intersections.
This tesseract diagram is now the one in universal use for
displaying small orders of 4-dimension magic hypercubes.
For the larger orders, a simple text listing is still the most
practical.
This is one way of listing the above tesseract
09 76 38 64 35 24 50 12 61 46 17 60 05 75 43 72 31 20 68 30 25 54 13 56 01 80 42 74 45 04 33 19 71 16 59 48 15 55 53 79 41 03 29 27 67 34 23 66 11 63 49 78 37 08 40 02 81 26 69 27 57 52 14 62 51 10 39 07 77 22 65 36 21 70 32 58 47 18 44 06 73
The purpose of this page is to show methods of illustrating a magic tesseract. Other pages on this site will discuss features and characteristics of the magic tesseract, and the relationships between this 4-d magic figure and it's 2-D and 3-D cousins.)
[1]John R. Hendricks, The Five and Six Dimensional Magic
Hypercubes of Order 3, Canadian Mathematical Bulletin, vol. 5, no. 2, 1962,
pp 171-189
[2]John R. Hendricks, Magic Squares to Tesseracts by Computer,
Self-published 1998, 0-9684700-0-9 the preface contains some history
of this discovery
![]()
The first magic tesseract?
In 1905, Dr. C. Planck published a paper [1] [2] for private circulation. Called The Theory of Paths Nasik, It dealt with perfect magic squares and cubes.
Dr. A. H. Frost defined the term Nasik in 1878 [3] as requiring that all paths sum correctly. He stated that the smallest order Nasik magic square is order-4 ( we call it pandiagonal), and the smallest order Nasik magic cube is order-8.
In explaining his theory, Dr. Planck constructed the order-9 pandiagonal magic square shown in 2. He then took the nine order-3 sub-squares and arranged them as shown in illustration 1. He called this a 'crude-magic octahedron.
| hh-1 (to the right) is the modern
method of displaying the 4-dimension magic hypercube. All lines parallel to the edges, and also the 8 quadragonals, sum correctly to the constant 123. I quote from his paper
Some points
Perfect?
Planck's paper expanded on Frost original definition of
Nasik, applying it to hypercubes where all lines sum
correctly i.e. perfect hypercubes. The smallest perfect magic tesseract possible is order-16. John Hendricks constructed the first one in 1999, and Clifford Pickover confirmed that it summed correctly to 524,296 in the required 163,840 ways (straight line paths only). [4] [5] |
hh-1 Modern day presentation of planck's 'octahedroid' |
|
|
hh-2 This is another aspect of the same tesseract |
[1] Dr. C. Planck, The Theory of Paths Nasik,
self-published in Haywards Heath, (England) in November 1905. 18 pages
self-cover.
[2] W. S. Andrews, Magic Squares and Cubes,2nd Edition, Open Court, 1917, pages
363-375 written by C. Planck.
This book republished by Dover Publ. in 1960. The above
fig. 10 and 11 (from the 1905 paper appear in Andrews as fig. 687 and 688.
[3] A.H. Frost, On the General Properties of Nasik Cubes, Quarterly Journal of
Mathematics, 15, 1878, pp 34-49.
[4] John R. Hendricks, Magic Squares to Tesseracts by Computer,
Self-published 1998, 0-9684700-0-9 pp 126-127 (and private
correspondence)
[5] Clifford A. Pickover, The Zen of Magic Squares, Circles, and Stars,
Princeton University Press, 2002, 0-691-07041-5, page 121.
Please send me Feedback about my Web
site!![]()
![]()
![]()
Harvey Heinz harveyheinz@shaw.ca
This page originated November, 2007
This page last updated
October 14, 2009
Copyright © 2007 by Harvey D. Heinz