![]()
Introduction Magic Squares Magic Cubes Magic Tesseracts
![]()
Introduction
Magic hypercubes may be classified by
reference to which r-agonals sum correctly to the magic constant. For
magic squares and magic cubes, this has been discussed previously.
[1][2][3][4]
A brief review will be presented on this page, using a different
prospective. Then I will present the classes for the magic tesseract. Note that
within these classes, the hypercube may have additional features, such as
associated, compact complete, inlaid, multiply, etc.
On this page, the variable
r will range from 1 to m, where m indicates the order. n,
as usual on my pages, will indicate the dimension of the hypercube.
Another name for 1-agonal is orthogonal lines (those parallel to the edges of
the hypercube). Only 1 coordinate change when moving along the line.
Another name for 2-agonal is diagonal. 2 coordinates change when moving along
the line.
Another name for 3-agonal is triagonal. 3 coordinates change when moving along
the line.
Another name for 4-agonal is quadragonal. 4 coordinates change when moving along
the line.
A particular hypercube may have some, but not all of the correct r-agonals
that would qualify it for a higher class.
The prefix pan indicates all of that r-agonal, both 1-segment and multi-segment (broken).
A pandiagonal magic square may be transformed to another pandiagonal magic square by moving a row or column from one side of the square to the opposite side. Similarly, a pantriagonal magic cube may be transformed into another pantriagonal magic cube by moving a plane from one side of the cube to the other! Furthermore, a panquadragonal magic tesseract may be transformed to another one by moving a cube from one side to the other! Etc.
![]()
Magic squares (n = 2)
There are only two classes of magic squares.
|
Class name |
Minimum requirements |
Minimum correct summation |
Lowest order |
|
Simple |
All 1-agonals and the two main 2-agonals sum correctly. |
2m + 2 |
3 |
|
Pandiagonal (nasik) |
All 1-agonals and all 2-agonals sum correctly. |
4m |
4 |
![]()
Magic cubes (n = 3)
There are six classes of magic cubes.
|
Class name |
Minimum requirements |
Minimum correct summations |
Lowest order |
|
Simple |
all 1-agonals and the four main 3-agonals sum correctly. |
3m2 + 4 |
3 |
|
Pantriagonal |
all 1-agonals and all 3-agonals sum correctly. |
7m2 |
4 |
|
Diagonal |
all 1-agonals and the four main 3-agonals sum correctly. In addition, the two main diagonals (2-agonals) of each orthogonal plane sum correctly. |
3m2+6m+4 |
5 |
|
Pantriagonal diagonal |
all 1-agonals and all 3-agonals sum correctly. In addition, the two main diagonals (2-agonals) of each orthogonal plane sum correctly. |
7m2+6m |
5 |
|
Pandiagonal |
all 1-agonals and the four main 3-agonals sum correctly. In addition, all 2-agonals of each orthogonal plane sum correctly. |
9m2 + 4 |
7 |
|
Nasik |
this is a combination Pantriagonal and Pandiagonal cube, so all 1-agonals and all 3-agonals sum correctly, and all 2-agonals of each orthogonal plane sum correctly. Hendricks calls this top class (all possible lines sum correctly) perfect. Nakamura calls it pan-2,3-agonal. |
13m2 |
8 |
Magic tesseracts (n = 4)
There are 2 classes of magic squares and 6 classes of magic cubes. So it is to be expected that there will be many more classes of magic tesseract. In fact, there are 18. Names of these are arbitrarily chosen to be descriptive, rather then concise. As in the case for the square and the cube, these classes are listed in order of increasing number of correct lines. In late 2007, Mitsutoshi Nakamura had constructed a tesseract in most of these classes. [4]
|
Class name |
Minimum requirements |
Minimum correct summations |
Lowest order |
|
Simple |
All 1-agonals and the eight main (1-segment) 4-agonals
sum correctly. |
4m3 + 8 |
3 |
|
Triagonal |
Basic + all main (1-segment) 3-agonals sum correctly. |
4m3 + 16m + 8 |
4 |
|
Diagonal |
Basic + all main (1-segment) 2-agonals sum correctly. |
4m3 + 12m2 + 8 |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Triagonal |
Basic + all main 2-agonals and 3-agonals sum correctly. |
4m3 + 12m2 + 16m + 8 |
8? |
|
Panquadragonal |
Basic + all 4-agonals sum correctly. |
12m3 |
4 |
|
Triagonal + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment 3-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
12m3 + 16m |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment 2-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
12m3 + 12m2 |
8? |
|
Diagonal + Triagonal + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment 2-agonals + all 1-segment 3-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
12m3 + 12m2 + 16m |
8? |
|
Pandiagonal |
Basic + all 2-agonals. |
16m3 + 8 |
9? |
|
Triagonal + Pan2 |
Basic + all 1-segment 3-agonals + all 2-agonals. |
16m3 + 16m + 8 |
? |
|
Pantriagonal |
Basic + all 3-agonals. |
20m3 + 8 |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Pan3 |
Basic + all 1-segment 2-agonals + all 3-agonals. |
20m3 + 12m2 + 8 |
? |
|
Pan2 + Pan4 |
Basic + all 2-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
24m3 |
13? |
|
Triagonal + Pan2 + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment 3-agonals + all 2-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
24m3 + 16m |
16? |
|
Pan3 + Pan4 |
Basic + all 3-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
28m3 |
4 |
|
Diagonal + Pan3 + Pan4 |
Basic + all 1-segment 2-agonals + all 3-agonals + all 4-agonals. |
28m3 + 12m2 |
8 |
|
Pan2 + Pan3 |
Basic + all 2-agonals + all 3-agonals. |
32m3 + 8 |
15? |
|
Nasik [5] |
Basic + all 2-agonals + all 3-agonals + all 4-agonals.
|
40m3 |
16 |
Statistical
information on these classifications are shown in tables on my
Hypercube Math
page.
I have not personally checked most of the tesseracts mentioned in this table.
Footnotes
[1] Heinz & Hendricks, A Unified Classification System for Magic
Hypercubes, Journal of Recreational Mathematics, 32:1, 2003-2004, pages
30-36
[2] H. D. Heinz, The First (?) Perfect Magic Cubes, JRM, 33:2,
2004-2005, pages 116-119
[3] My Six Classes of Cubes
http://members.shaw.ca/hdhcubes/#6 Classes of Cubes
[4] Mitsutoshi Nakamura’s
http://homepage2.nifty.com/googol/magcube/en/classes.htm
[5] Nasik from Frost’s original term for pandiagonal magic
squares, and Planck’s subsequent expansion of the definition to include the
highest class of all dimensions of magic hypercubes. See [6][7][8] and my
Nasik article
[6] A. H. Frost,
Invention of Magic Cubes, Quarterly Journal of Mathematics, 7, 1866,
pages 92-102. See page 99, para. 23 and page 100, para. 26.
[7] C. Planck, The Theory of Path Nasiks, Printed for private
circulation by A. J. Lawrence, Printer, Rugby (England),1905
(Available from The University Library, Cambridge).
[8] W. S. Andrews, Magic Squares and Cubes. Open Court Publ.,1917.
Pages 365,366, by Dr. C. Planck. Re-published by Dover Publ., 1960, Pages
365,366 (no ISBN);
Dover Publ., 2000, 0486206580; Cosimo Classics, Inc., 2004, 1596050373
Please send me Feedback about my Web
site!![]()
![]()
![]()
Harvey Heinz harveyheinz@shaw.ca
This page originated November, 2007
This page last updated
October 14, 2009
Copyright © 2004 by Harvey D. Heinz