Guitar Player
August, 1990
ROBIN TROWER
IN THE LINE OF FIRE
By Jas Obrecht
Damn the racks. Chuck the digital processors.
Off with those MIDI'd heads. For Robin Trower, only the big, big
sound of the natural guitar is good enough: "A lot of these guitar
players are into having a rack of all these processors," he says
in a thick south London accent. "When I've gone through them, I've
lost the personality of my own individual sound. See, I like the
sound of the guitar. All I want to do is amplify it."
To help drape the ultimate sonic
landscape, Robin hired Eddie Kramer (of Jimi Hendrix and Led Zeppelin fame)
to produce In The Line Of Fire. Trower's new LP begins, oddly
enough, in a decidedly synth-pop direction, with singer Davey Pattison
and keyboardist Bobby Mayo lushing it up while the guitar's relegated to
the background. A visceral solo or two later, the real Robin Trower
begins to emerge. He weaves a Layla-lovely line through "Under
The Gun," scuffs-up the anthemic "Turn The Volume Up," and taps
blues roots for "Natural Fact." Slow ballads, "If You Really
Want To Find Love" and "(I Would) Still Be Here For You"
smoulder in the heavenly heavy Bridge Of Sighs tradition.
Trower saves some of his best jabs for "(Let's) Turn This Fight
Into A Brawl," and pays tribute to Jimi Hendrix with the "Voodoo
Chile" motifs of "Climb Above The Rooftops."
At 45, Trower feels as strongly
about individuality as he did a generation ago, when he won acclaim playing
with Procol Harum. "I have to get off on playing something," he insists.
"It can't just be a melody line and lyrics. It's got to have a very
strong identity - my identity - in the guitar parts." Raised
in London, Robin made his professional debut in 1962 with the R&B-oriented
Paramounts, and he began his celebrated stint with Procol Harum in 1967.
While soaring on portions of Procol Harum, Shine On Brightly,
A Salty Dog, Home and Broken Barricades, Trower felt increasingly frustrated
at having to share solos with keyboards. In 1971 he decided to quit.
"On Broken Barricades I was starting to spread my wings, getting
more into writing songs," he told Jim Schwartz in the July '80 issue.
"Obviously, if you write a song and you're a guitarist, there's going to
be more guitar in it. That was the beginning of the leaving the Procol
Harum; I was fascinated by being able to write music for the guitar."
And write he did. He cast
his next project, Twice Removed From Yesterday, in the classic power-trio
mold of Cream and the Jimi Hendrix Experience. "What we're dealing
in," he said upon its release, "is pure, simple feeling, a direct contact
with the audience. Soul to soul - with as little in between as possible."
The audience received the message, and Trower was hailed among fans as
another Jimi Hendrix. His follow-up releases Bridge Of Sighs,
For
Earth Below and Robin Trower Live! all made the top 10, while
his band regularly packed 20,000 seaters. By 1980, Long Misty
Days, In City Dreams, Caravan To Midnight and Victims
Of The Fury had also cracked the top 40. The guitarist was back
under the spotlights in 1981 with B.L.T., a power-trio with Jack
Bruce that lasted two albums. He was rejoined by his long-time singer
James Dewar on 1983's Back It Up and then, without Dewar, released
the partially live Beyond The Mist in 1985, followed by Take
What You Need.
We spoke with Robin at home
in England. This fall, he plans to bring his In The Line Of Fire
tour back to the U.S.
* * * *
Your new album gets progressively heavier.
As you go through the album,
it gets more and more me, doesn't it? The opening has got all the
poppier kind of songs - on the first side, particularly. The B side
is definitely the more rock and roll side. The way it's mixed is
more of a produced kind of sound. It's mixed to radio and to fit
into more of a formulated kind of thing, as much as my stuff ever will
- I don't think that's ever going to be anything I'm really accused of.
What was it like working
with Eddie Kramer?
It was great! It's
excellent. Not only does he know how to get a great sound, but he
knows how to capture performance and retain it through the whole
process. Quite often by the time you've gone through the whole process
and it's mixed down, you end up with less than you thought you had, somehow.
It quite often has happened to me, in terms of the vitality of the performance.
It's happened to me on a lot of stuff. The beauty of what Eddie's
done is he's retained the vitality of the performance. You can still
hear that in the product.
There's some very emotional
guitar playing on it.
Thank you very much.
Great. Well, that's exactly what I'm talking about, as far as Eddie
capturing the performance.
Did you learn anything new
about recording guitar while working with Eddie?
I noticed the way he
went about recording it. The method of miking up and all that was
completely different than anything I've ever come across. He used
a tremendous amount of microphones. I was using three heads - three
Fender Twins - through three different 4x12 Marshall cabinets and he had
about three mikes on each cabinet, plus a load of them at different distances.
A real lot of microphones, you know.
Did you run all these amps
at once?
That's right, yeah.
It was loud. It was very loud because the studio has this
room that's not big. but it's all completely live. It had a marble-faced
wall. You couldn't actually stand in there and play - even when you
tried to turn down, it was so acoustically loud. So I played in the
next room, which was a control booth. The studio was an old Catholic
church - quite a big building. I would say it probably held about
200 people when it had the pews in. They hadn't changed anything
about the building, apart from taking the seating out. So the main
room where the drums were recorded was just a huge, great, wooden, beautiful-sounding
room, and it had such a lovely vibe to it, a real natural warmth.
The guitar parts were all done in the smaller room off of the big church;
I suppose it was the old vestibule. Quite often I would have one
of the three cabinets out in the big room, as well, when Eddie wanted some
washier kind of sounds. The speaker cabinet would be at one end;
the microphone would be down at the other end up in the organ mezzanine.
He recorded some of the things from that far away to get a very dreamy
kind of sound. Yeah, he got up to all sorts of tricks.
What mikes worked the best?
I know he had Shure SM-585 on
everything, and some other stuff, as well. There were quite a few
different kinds. We found that the close miking sounded best with
the Shures. For the distant mikes, I think he was using those big
German Neumanns.
Did he try to find the best
speaker in each cabinet?
Yep. He did all
that.
Did you use any guitars that
were not Fender Stratocasters?
No. The only difference
between any of my guitars is that some of them have Lace pickups.
But most of the stuff on that album certainly had just the standard Vintage
Reissued guitars.
Do you believe in buying
Strats made during the late '50s and early '60's?
Not anymore. I
did have a very good collection of '50's and early '60's Strats, but they
were all stolen in 1979, when I lost 15 vintage Strats, two Les Pauls,
and a Telecaster. Since then, I've decided that it's got to be newly
made, replaceable instruments. And now Fender has made these Strats
specifically for me, and I wouldn't want to lose any of them, either.
Is any particular guitar
close to your heart?
Not really. There
was one I had years ago, a '56 maple-neck Strat that was a real beauty,
but it was stolen. I've got about eight guitars that Fender has made
for me in the last three years, and three of them I really love.
The rest are all very good, but you know how you just make a connection
with certain instruments. I've got a Martin, too. I do a bit
of writing on acoustic sometimes.
What do you look for in a
Strat?
Well, I personally like
not too dense of a body - obviously, not too light, but not a dense, heavy
piece of wood, either, because I tend to think it might sound a bit brittle,
and thin. I like to couple it with a fairly big neck - I go for more
of a fat, '50s-size neck. That way you get a nice openness, a good
sustain, and a broader kind of depth and width to the sound. Always
listen to them acoustically and pick the ones that sound the best, that
have the open, ringing quality. That's where the sound starts, and
if that isn't right, there's no way you can do anything to it that's going
to make it sound right.
Are yours modified?
No. There as built, but
they are built to my specifications. They're a combination of the
Vintage Reissue bodies and electrics and metalwork, but the necks are American
Standards, which have less of a radius. They're a little bit flatter
and a bit easier to play. It's got the biggest frets . That's
the only concession I make. I still prefer the sound of the Vintage
Reissue, especially because of the saddles. They make a tremendous
difference to the sound.
What's the difference between
the stock pickups and Lace Sensors?
Well, there is a big
difference, but they are both very good. The Vintage Reissues have
a very dirty top end; they have that kind of character to the top end,
which is really the Strat sound. The Lace pickups have a bolder sound;
it's much more forthright, but it's still a very, very good sound.
I vacillate between the two. When I'm on the road, I'll play a Vintage
Reissue-pickup guitar for a while and think that's the greatest; and then
after a couple of weeks I'll try out the Lace and think that's the greatest.
I definitely go between the two. And a pickup is a good half of the
sound; the other half is the actual acoustic sound of the guitar.
Do you ever have trouble
staying in tune?
I haven't since I've
used these locking keys that Fender's got now. You lock the strings
into the tuners themselves, and they work fantastic. You basically
don't have any wrap-around with the string; you just feed it in and lock
it from underneath with a screw. By not having any wrap-arounds,
you have a lot less movement; there's a lot less to play with when you're
using the tremolo arm.
How long does a set of strings
last you?
I change mine every day
when I'm on the road, so a couple or three hours. I suppose I use
pretty heavy gauges - it's a .012 on the first, .015, .017, .026, .036,
.048.
Why the .012?
If you're going to get
sound out of the guitar, that's where it all comes from.
Has your equipment set-up
gotten increasingly high-tech?
I don't think so.
It's gotten less if anything. I'm using less stuff now than I was
in the '70s. On the last tour I used four Marshall heads into four
cabinets, and I was using three pedals - a Jennings Cry Baby wah-wah, a
[Tube Works] Real Tube, and the cheapest, very simplest Boss Chorus.
I had tried these rack things - you know, a lot of these guitar players
are into having a rack of all these processors - and when I've gone through
them, I've lost the personality of my own individual sound. See,
I like the sound of the guitar. All I want to do is amplify it, really.
I don't need to change it that much. I just like the actual acoustic
guitar sound, and I like to hear that coming back through the amp.
Which pickup settings work
best for soloing?
Well, it varies. On the
album, I was using these new Fender Twin amps and just the chorus, and
I was using the preamp in the amp, instead of an outside one. So
for soloing, I was using a lot of the neck pickup. But it varies
more live. I tend to go between the bridge and the neck, mostly,
but I use all three pickups. There are certain songs where I use
the middle pickups, like "Bridge Of Sighs" and stuff like that.
I like all three. They've all got their own personality, and they're
all very usable.
Do you work the volume and
tone knobs a lot?
Just the volume.
I very rarely touch the tone.
On the new album, "If
You Really Want To Find Love" has the classic Robin Trower solo sound.
Yeah. That sound
is the Boss Chorus going into those three Twins going into the Marshall
4x12. I've got a feeling that for those solos, I used an in-between
pickup sound, in between middle and neck.
What about "Turn The Volume
Up"?
That was my Lace-pickup
guitar on that. The first half of the solo was done on the bridge
pickup and halfway through I changed over to the neck. It's a different
sound, the Lace pickups - there's no doubt about it. It seems to
me that the Lace pickups suit the maple neck better than they do the rosewood,
because with the maple necks you get a little more of the top end that
you're missing a bit from the Lace pickups, so they make up for it.
What's the most enjoyable
aspect of the recording process?
It's a great thrill when
things start to really come to the finish, when you're starting to hear
the completed tracks. Obviously, the most fun for a guitar player
is playing the guitar. Playing the solos is probably the most fun.
I love to solo. I quite often have all my guitar parts done even
before the vocals and overdubs like keyboards and percussion. It
varies, though.
Do you do all the solos at
once?
No. I usually work
on the guitar parts, the background. When I've got those down, I
start to get an itch to lay some solo work on it, so I usually have a go
at it, then and there. I don't always get it, but quite often because
I've done the guitar part, I start to get a feel for what the solo could
be. It tunes me into it, rather than just coming in cold one day
and having to go at so-and-so. When you've just played the background
for about an hour, you're really into the track and you've got the atmosphere
of it, so it's a good time to do solos.
Do you always know when you've
done the take?
For instance, that "Turn
The Volume Up" solo - that was the first take, the first solo I tried
on that track. When I finished it, I thought, no, that's going to
be too silly. I knew it was a lot of fun because it was so wild,
and when I heard it back I said "Oh, no. We've got to keep that,
because it's just a happening." It isn't perfect. but it definitely
has the feeling to it. Very suitable for the song.
"Still Be Here For You"
also has a strong solo.
In actual fact, that's
one of the tracks that's just really a better version of my demo.
I made demos of all the songs that I'd written with a drum machine.
I got almost to the point of having the solos good enough to go to a master.
So I really had defined what I wanted to do - to a certain extent.
Obviously, when you go in, you're going to blow, but I had the approach
for that song in my mind. I wanted to make it as soulful as possible.
This is the first album I've
ever done demoing on, and I was thrilled with the results because I managed
to completely sort out what I wanted to do with each piece of music,
in terms of the whole feel and arrangement and tempos. Most of the
songs managed to retain the initial idea about them when they were first
written all the way through the process, because they were pretty well
defined by the time I played them to everybody else involved. For
two or three of them, the bass and drums just more or less did what was
on the demo. They added their own feeling, but it was pretty close
to that.
Being more three-piece oriented,
"Natural Fact" has a feel like your earlier material.
Yeah. We tried
to rock that one out as much as possible. I didn't have anything
specific in mind for that solo; I just tried to have fun and blow with
it.
Are those electronically
harmonized guitars layered near the end of the solo?
That's all overdubbing.
That's not harmonized. I've messed about with harmonizers, but I've
never actually used them on anything. The effect is too synthetic
for me.
Your new singer, Davey Pattison,
sometimes sounds a lot like your original singer, James Dewar.
They're both Scottish
and have a lot of similar influences - the old Bobby Bland, Donnie
Hathaway, James Brown kind of influence. Scottish vocalists tend
to be more earthy. I heard from James a little while ago. He's
not been well, unfortunately. It's a shame. He's not able to
work at the moment.
What do you expect from your
bassist?
I like the bass to be
rhythmic, without in any way encroaching upon guitar territory. I
don't like the boinky-boinky stuff, which gets in conflict with my guitar
sound, the way I play. I tend to stray into bass territory quite
a bit. You get a bassist that's coming my way, and you're going to
get a lot of clashing.
Any plans to tour with a
keyboardist?
No. I don't really
like the idea of using keyboards live because it ties me down. I
like to switch about a bit.
On record, "Sea Of Love"
relies heavily on keyboards. Can you do that as a three-piece?
Yeah. Works great,
too. We rock it up a bit more - that's usually how you get away with
not having keyboards. There are definitely two different sides to
what one has to do today. One is making records, and one is playing
live. There should be a noticeable difference between the two.
So often today, you go out and hear people, and they are just doing pretty
close facsimiles of their records, albeit very well performed and blah
blah blah. But live, I like to get that little bit of danger into
it. It's not just a matter of energy and excitement, but that's an
important thing. I like to be wilder. People appreciate the
fact that it does seem more than the record, that you are putting over
as much as you could possibly give it, rather than just being happy to
reproduce the record.
Do you ever have off nights?
Oh, yeah. You do.
Things beyond your control are sometimes going to blow it for you.
With a Strat, especially, you pick up a lot of RF [radio frequency] interference.
Sometimes that can be so heavy that it just spoils the whole night for
you. I find that I pick up RF in America more than anywhere else,
I've never had that problem in Europe.
Is it necessary for you to
warm up or practice?
Oh, yeah. I have
to get a minimum of 15 minutes, but I like a bit more than that before
I go on, just to get the hand working. Also, using new string, you've
got to warm those up, as well. I don't have exercises - I just
play, just doodle.
Do you play many cover songs?
I do a version of B.B.
King's "Rock Me Baby," which I did on the first album. That's
the only cover I do live.
Are there songs that you
have to play in concert?
Oh, yeah. "Bridge Of
Sighs," definitely. "Day Of The Eagle," definitely.
Those two. People feel cheated if I don't play them, and I don't
feel right going on without playing them.
They are your signature pieces?
Yeah, that's it.
Another song I like to do is "Daydream," from the first record.
I get a lot of kick out of doing that.
Do you ever perform songs
that predate your solo career?
I haven't ever done this
before, but I'm thinking about putting in a song from Procol Harum called
"Whiskey Train." I keep getting requests for it. I've
had a thing against doing any Procol Harum stuff, but I might give it a
try. After all, I wrote the music for it.
Are you more at ease playing
ballads or rockers?
My stuff tends to lean
towards my natural flow, which is definitely from mid-tempo down to slow
stuff. Whenever I play for my own enjoyment, it's always a slow blues.
If I sit down with a guitar, I tend to doodle around a slow, slow thing.
I write more slow stuff than up-tempo; I have to work hard at the up-tempo
stuff.
Do you ever jam along with
other people's records?
No. When I was
starting as a player and teaching myself, I tried to work out the old B.B.
King lick or anything like that. I didn't get the same feeling from
me playing it, even though I'd worked it out as close as you could possibly
get. So I quickly dropped that idea of lifting other people's stuff.
I didn't get a response from inside, because it was his soul, not
mine. It's a bit limited, that, as far as being a teaching tool,
I always tell young players to try to find out what the music inside them
is, rather than lifting other people's stuff. By doing too much of
that, you're going to put a block on your own music coming out.
There was a time when you
were seen as playing very Hendrixy.
Yeah. Well, he
was a big influence on me; there's no doubt about it. When I try
to work out who the main people are who made the music that I make what
it is today, it's always James Brown, Howlin' Wolf and Hendrix. Those
are the three. All through the early '60s, when I was forming my
personality, those were the guys I listened to the most. Obviously,
there are a lot of other influences, too - Albert King and B.B. King have
been very big influences on my lead style - but the music of those three
guys is really the nucleus of what I do. It was great music, see
Howlin' Wolf wasn't necessarily a great player, but the music he made was
the best. That's something I always try to stress to players:
The technical thing has nothing to do with the actual music you make.
That side of it is only a tool. Howlin' Wolf is the best example
of that; Muddy Waters is another one. These guys weren't great players
by the accepted terms that we use today, but they made better music than
anybody that's come since. I'm still absolutely fascinated by these
people. Howlin' Wolf - I still listen to that stuff, and I just can't
figure it out. Hubert Sumlin did some brilliant work for Howlin'
Wolf; there's no doubt about it.
Who's the best guitar player
you've ever seen?
Albert King. I've heard
that he's complaining about all the young guitar players who are ripping
him off, pinching all his licks. There are a few about today who
are copying his stuff and making fortunes out of it.
How do you feel when someone
mimics your playing?
I'm not sure I've ever
heard anybody steal my stuff. I occasionally hear some music where
maybe I've influenced the guys idea, but it's not like Albert King, where
his licks are just so... well, he's the only guy who's ever played like
that. And if you hear his licks, you know who they belong to.
He's the only guitar player that you can actually say that about, at least
in terms of the blues guys. He's got such a personality and an unbelievable
identity. His whole style is more unique than anybody I've ever heard.
I've always been a huge fan - particularly the Stax stuff. When I
saw him last year, I was completely floored. That was the best guitar
playing I have ever seen. Unbelievable amount of soul. After
I'd heard that, for a couple of days I didn't want to play guitar.
He's definitely the man.
Do you keep a guitar at home?
Oh, yeah. I've
got to have a guitar all the time, because I'm trying to write all the
time. You always think about the next album. I always have
a portable tape recorder, too. It's like a Sony Walkman, but it's
got a built-in mike, so you're instantly into it. I always have a
tape ready to go at all times. Say, for instance, you could be warming
up in your hotel room and come across an idea five minutes before someone's
going to knock and take you to the show. You've got to bang these
ideas down quick, because by the time the show's over, there's no way you're
going to remember it. I have actually come up with good songs in
that circumstance.
Many songwriter claim that
the best songs happen very quickly.
I've got a very good
example of that: "If You Really Want To Find Love."
I'd almost finished writing that music before I'd realized that I was writing
a new song. It was wonderful, the way that one came. The best
ones always do come very quickly. For me, the good ones never take
more than half and hour to get 95% of the music. They come from somewhere
else, really. Songs have a real mystique to them. One minute
it's not there, and then it is. As a musician, the greatest thrill
is to write a new piece of music.
Have you got a backlog of
tunes?
No, but I've got some
stuff that didn't make it onto this album, a couple of things. One
of them I do live, because I was choked it didn't get onto the record.
To make up for it, I put it in the set. I've got material for the
next record, but I'm a long way from having enough.
Do you experiment with other
styles of music?
No, I don't think so.
That's it. What you hear is what you get.