Assessment
Hit
the Target
Evidence
of Teamwork
Project Log which indicates what was done, when and by whom.
Everyone
must do their part.
Research
2 Pages
Bibliography
Project
Must demonstrate how we can use energy resources more wisely.
| Group Collaborative & Cooperative Project Rubric |
Superior Performance (9-10 marks)
|
Capable Performance (5-8 marks)
|
Limited Performance (1-4 marks)
|
| Collaboration & Co-operation | all
students enthusiastically discuss ideas & opinions |
most
of the students discuss ideas & opinions |
relies
on 1 or 2 spokespersons to discuss ideas & opinions |
| ideas & opinions are presented & received in ways that are sensitive to the feelings & knowledge of others | ideas & opinions are generally presented & received in ways that are sensitive to the feelings & knowledge of others | ideas
& opinions are presented & received in ways that are insensitive
to the feelings & knowledge of others |
|
| lively
discussion centered on the topic |
discussion
is centered on the topic |
discussion
isn’t centered on the topic |
|
| all
group members contribute equally to the completion of the task |
most
of the group members contribute equally to the completion of the task |
relies
on 1 or 2 group members to complete the task |
|
| recognizes when the group is off task & effectively mediates to regain group focus | recognizes
when the group is off task & mediates to regain group focus |
unable
to recognize when the group is off task & mediate to regain group
focus |
|
| effectively
uses group decision making techniques such as voting & compromise to
reach consensus |
uses group decision making techniques such as voting & compromise to reach consensus | unable
to use group decision making techniques such as voting & compromise to
reach consensus |
|
|
Critical
Thinking Strategies |
demonstrates a clear & accurate understanding of the task | generally
demonstrates a clear & accurate understanding of the task |
demonstrates
little understanding of the task |
| devises
a well thought plan to complete the task |
devises
a plan to complete the task |
unable
to devise a plan to complete the task |
|
| effectively selects & uses a variety of strategies to complete the task | selects & uses a variety of strategies to complete the task | unable to select & use a variety of strategies to complete the task | |
| Communication of Ideas | well
organized presentation |
organized presentation | disorganized
presentation |
| expresses
ideas & opinions clearly & accurately with extensive support &
detail |
expresses
ideas & opinions clearly & accurately with support & detail |
ideas & opinions require clarification | |
| creates a product which exceeds conventional standards | creates a quality product which meets conventional standards | creates an inferior product which doesn’t meet conventional standards |
| Research Project Rubric |
Superior Performance (9-10 marks)
|
Capable Performance (5-8 marks)
|
Limited Performance (1-4 marks)
|
|
Research
Process (Note-taking, drafting, revising & editing, conferencing,
& final draft)
|
uses
a wide number of resources |
uses
a number of resources |
uses
few resources |
| makes
extensive notes |
makes
adequate notes |
makes
few notes |
|
|
effectively
uses complex reasoning
strategies to select appropriate information |
uses
complex reasoning strategies to select appropriate information |
copies information directly from the source | |
| writes
an exceptionally detailed rough draft |
writes
a detailed rough draft |
writes
a sketchy draft |
|
| effectively revises to add or delete information | revises to add or delete information | doesn’t revise to add or delete information | |
| effectively
edits draft |
edits
draft requiring minimal assistance |
requires
extensive assistance to edit |
|
| uses the research process proficiently | uses research process capably | experiences difficulty using the research process | |
| Organization and Sequence | introduces the topic effectively | introduces
the topic |
little
attempt to introduce the topic |
| shows
exceptional sequencing in terms of arranging information |
shows
careful sequencing in terms of arranging information |
little
evidence of sequencing in terms of arranging information |
|
| concludes report effectively | concludes report capably | little evidence of a conclusion | |
|
Content
|
develops
ideas to form an interesting & inclusive report |
develops
ideas to form a detailed report |
a list of facts not always on topic |
| reveals an extensive knowledge of the subject | reveals satisfactory knowledge of the subject | reveals a limited knowledge of the subject | |
|
Mechanics/Grammar/Word
Usage
|
uses
a variety of sentence structures effectively |
uses
a variety of sentence structures capably |
sentence structure is weak |
| uses well written, effective paragraphs | uses
paragraph format |
little
or no evidence of paragraphs |
|
| uses descriptive vocabulary | uses general vocabulary | vocabulary
is repetitive |
|
| consistently
uses correct capitalization |
generally uses correct capitalization | little
or no evidence of capitalization |
|
| consistently
uses correct punctuation |
generally uses correct punctuation | little or no evidence of punctuation | |
| consistently
uses correct spelling |
generally
uses correct spelling |
frequent
spelling errors |
|
| word usage is clear & concise | word usage is clear & accurate | word usage is unclear & inaccurate | |
| Representation | format
is effective |
format
is appropriate |
format is inappropriate |
| extensive
use of creativity enhances the project |
use
of creativity enhances the project |
little
attempt to enhance the project |
|
| uses pictures, graphs, charts, & diagrams extensively | uses pictures, graphs, charts, & diagrams |
little
use of pictures, graphs, charts, & diagrams |
|
| attractive
& appealing |
moderately attractive & appealing | messy | |
| well organized lay-out | satisfactory lay-out | disorganized |
| Oral Presentation Rubric |
Superior Performance
|
Capable Performance (5-8 marks)
|
Limited Performance (1-4 marks)
|
| Content |
exceptional
introduction which catches the audience’s interest |
has
an introduction which catches the audience’s interest |
introduction
doesn't catch the audience’s interest |
|
uses
extensive detail to develop the topic |
uses
detail to develop the topic |
topic isn't developed in detail |
|
|
details are consistently relevant to the topic |
details are generally relevant to the topic |
details aren't relevant to the topic |
|
|
develops
details in a clear, concise fashion |
generally
develops details in a clear, concise fashion develops details in a
sequence |
develops details in a random fashion |
|
|
develops details in a clear & logical sequence |
develops details in a sequence |
details are developed out of sequence |
|
|
has an effective conclusion |
has a conclusion |
little sense of conclusion |
|
| Presentation | effectively uses tone & emphasis to convey points |
uses tone & emphasis to convey points |
uses a monotone voice |
|
use
a clear, distinct voice |
uses a clear, audible voice |
uses
an inaudible voice |
|
|
uses rich vocabulary |
uses
meaningful vocabulary |
uses
repetitive vocabulary |
|
|
effectively
maintains the audience’s attention |
generally maintains the audience’s attention |
unable to maintain the audience’s attention |
|
|
shows enthusiasm & interest in the topic |
shows
interest in the topic |
shows little interest in the topic |
|
|
shows confidence & poise in presenting to the group |
shows
confidence in presenting to the group |
lacks
confidence in presenting to the group |
|
|
effectively establishes & maintains contact with the audience |
establishes
& maintains contact with the audience |
unable to establish & maintain contact with the audience |
|
|
uses notes effectively |
uses notes appropriately |
relies extensively on notes |
| WebPages Rubric |
Superior Performance |
Capable Performance (5-8 marks)
|
Limited Performance (1-4 marks)
|
| Ideas and Content | Information is accurate and current | Information not always clear | Information incomplete or inaccurate |
| Ideas come mainly from primary sources | Primary source use is not always clear | Information not from primary sources | |
| Authors show knowledge and insight | Content connections not always clear | Value of information is unclear | |
| Effective use of technology demonstrated | Does not relate content to larger context | Little or no overall context for information | |
| All information relates to the overall purpose | Strong purpose not demonstrated | Lacks sense of purpose or central theme | |
| Complete bibliographic information | Attempt to complete bibliography | No way to check validity of information | |
| Organization | Inviting opening page draws the visitor inside | Inconsistent structure of pages | No orientation for visitors |
| Details are logical and effective | Sequencing is inconsistent | Sequencing unclear | |
| Layout of pages provides good direction | Some pages incomplete | Pages lack closure | |
| How to explore an idea is clear | Some links disjointed; lack purpose | No focus for links | |
| Each page begins with a clear transition | Unclear connections among sections | Pages are inconsistent | |
| Easy to navigate through the pages | Sense of being lost or unsure navigating | Difficult to navigate in an organized way | |
| Language and Conventions | Organizational structure is clear and coherent | Long or incomplete paragraphs | Paragraph structure is missing |
| Grammar and usage are correct | Minor problems with grammar or usage | Errors in grammar or usage noticeable | |
| Punctuation is accurate | Punctuation is sometimes missing or wrong | Many punctuation mistakes | |
| Spelling is generally correct | Spelling is usually correct | Frequent spelling errors | |
| Site needs little or no editing | Site needs some editing | Site needs extensive editing | |
| Presentation | Web site is clearly identified; easy to find | Web site easy to find | Web site hard to find |
| The layout is clear and easy to follow | Layout of most pages is easy to follow | Layout is confusing or inappropriate | |
| Backgrounds and text work well together | Backgrounds and text are not effective | Backgrounds and text not effective | |
| Graphic elements are used consistently | Inconsistent or inappropriate use of graphics | Graphics only decorative or confusing | |
| Multimedia adds to the main purpose | Multimedia sometimes doesn't add to the main purpose | Multimedia unrelated to the topic | |
| Links are appropriate | Use of links is unclear | Too many unrelated links, or too few links | |
| Technical | Links work | Not all links work | Links don't work |
| Graphics are optimized | Graphics are generally optimized | Graphic elements not optimized | |
| Works in all browsers | Some pages don't work in all browsers | Specific browsers needed | |
| Works in text only mode | Text-only mode could be improved | Text only mode does not work | |
| Multimedia resources work properly | Multimedia resources work most of the time | Resources fail to work |
|
Posted & maintained by Janice Biebrich |
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |
Updated March 27/03 |