The five basic Platonic solids, the tetrahedron, cube, octahedron, dodecahedron, and icosahedron, are illustrated in the diagram below.

After these, the most basic solid shapes, there is a family of shapes whose faces are regular polygons which is one step less uniform than them, known as the Archimedean solids. These bodies are those which may have more than one type of face, but which only have one kind of corner.

Some of the Archimedean solids can be formed by trimming off the corners of a Platonic solid. For example, we can start with a dodecahedron, and trim off its corners to change each face from a pentagon to a decagon, leaving an additional small triangular face at each corner. Or, we can trim more deeply, again having a triangular face where the corners of the dodecahedron were, but this time changing the pentagonal faces to smaller pentagons facing the other way, as illustrated in the diagram below:

The three solids depicted above are the dodecahedron, a Platonic solid, and the two Archimedean solids known as the truncated dodecahedron and the icosidodecahedron.

Another shape, which could be obtained from a dodecahedron, is easier to obtain by this method by trimming the corners of an icosahedron, thus creating little pentagonal faces at each corner, and changing the triangular faces to hexagons, as shown below:

This new shape is called the truncated icosahedron. And it is, of course, a familiar shape to soccer fans, since the pattern on most soccer balls is based on this solid, with the hexagons white and the pentagons black. But a soccer ball is still a sphere, not a polygon. I could have trimmed off the corners more deeply, changing the triangles into triangles pointed the other way instead of to hexagons, but if I did that, I would just have obtained the icosidodecahedron again (although it would have appeared in this diagram from a different point of view, looking down an axis of threefold symmetry instead of one of fivefold symmetry).

Replacing triangles by triangles pointed the other way or by hexagons, and stretching an edge so it becomes a square, we can derive two other Archimedean solids from the ones we have seen so far, as seen below:

These solids are known as the small rhombicosidodecahedron and the great rhombicosidodecahedron.

Yet another solid belongs to this branch of the family of Archimedean solids, the snub dodecahedron. This one was, however, too hard for me to draw accurately using the technique I have been using for these diagrams. However, I was able to draw a picture of the surface of one in an unfolded state.

The snub dodecahedron, incidentally, comes in both a left-handed and a right-handed form, unlike the solids we have seen here.

If one replaces the dodecahedron by the cube, and the icosahedron (each of
these is a *dual* of the other; the dual of a polyhedron is the one whose
corners correspond to the centers of that polyhedron's faces) by the cube and
the octahedron, one can follow the same steps to get a set of analogous
Archimedean solids to those we've seen so far (including the snub cube, also
not depicted):

In the first row, we see the cube, followed by the truncated cube, the cuboctahedron, the truncated octahedron, and the octahedron. In the second row, the small rhombicuboctahedron and the great rhombicuboctahedron are presented. Even their names indicate how they correspond to the analogous polyhedra in the dodecahedron to icosahedron series above.

Again, here is the snub cube unfolded:

Finally, the tetrahedron may also have its corners truncated, producing the truncated tetrahedron:

If we were to truncate the corners more deeply, so as to change the existing faces to triangles pointed the other way instead of hexagons, we would not obtain an Archimedean solid, but instead another Platonic solid, the octahedron.

The dual of the icosidodecahedron happens to be an interesting shape, the rhombic triacontahedron, just as the rhombic dodecahedron is the dual of the cuboctahedron. Starting with the rhombic triacontahedron, and connecting the centers of its faces to produce the icosidodecahedron, this is illustrated below:

The rhombic triacontahedron is a very interesting shape, because of the explicit way in which it embodies the symmetries shared by the dodecahedron and icosahedron. Thus, both these Platonic solids may be very easily produced from the rhombic triacontahedron, by connecting together each of its two types of vertices, as illustrated below:

Oh, and by the way, I found a much better page about Archimedean solids elsewhere on the Web.