The History of Child
Abuseby Lloyd deMause
The Journal of Psychohistory 25 (3) Winter
1998 The
following speech was given at the National Parenting Conference in
Boulder, Colorado, on September 25, 1997:
During the past three
decades, I have spent much of my scholarly life examining primary sources
such as diaries, autobiographies, doctor's reports, ethnographic reports
and other documents that document what it must have felt like to have been
a child--yesterday and today, in the East and the West, in literate and
preliterate cultures.
In several hundred studies published by
myself and my associates in The Journal of Psychohistory, we have provided
extensive evidence that the history of childhood has been a nightmare from
which we have only recently begun to awaken. The further back in history
one goes--and the further away from the West one gets--the more massive
the neglect and cruelty one finds and the more likely children are to have
been killed, rejected, beaten, terrorized and sexually abused by their
caretakers.
Indeed, my conclusion from a lifetime of
psychohistorical study of childhood and society is that the history of
humanity is founded upon the abuse of children. Just as family therapists
today find that child abuse often functions to hold families together as a
way of solving their emotional problems, so, too, the routine assault of
children has been society's most effective way of maintaining its
collective emotional homeostasis. Most historical families once practiced
infanticide, erotic beating and incest. Most states sacrificed and
mutilated their children to relieve the guilt of adults. Even today, we
continue to arrange the daily killing, maiming, molestation and starvation
of children through our social, military and economic activities. I would
like to summarize here some of the evidence I have found as to why child
abuse has been humanity's most powerful and most successful ritual, why it
has been the cause of war and social violence, and why the eradication of
child abuse and neglect is the most important social task we face today.
Back
to the Top
The main psychological mechanism that operates in all child abuse
involves using children as what I have termed poison
containers--receptacles into which adults project disowned parts of their
psyches, so they can control these feelings in another body without danger
to themselves. In good parenting, the child uses the caretaker as a poison
container, much as it earlier used the mother's placenta as a poison
container for cleansing its polluted blood. A good mother reacts with
calming actions to the cries of a baby and helps it "detoxify² its
dangerous emotions. But when an immature mother's baby cries, she cannot
stand the screaming, and strikes out at the child. As one battering mother
put it, "I have never felt loved all my life. When the baby was born, I
thought he would love me. When he cried, it meant he didn't love me. So I
hit him.² Rather than the child being able to use the parent to detoxify
its fears and anger, the parent instead injects his or her bad feelings
into the child and uses it to cleanse his or herself of depression and
anger.
Consider a typical infanticidal, incestuous culture, the
Bimin-Kuskusmin of New Guinea. As is so often true in pre-literate
cultures, the mothers have long post-partum taboos against sex with their
husbands, sleep naked against their children until they are about four
years old, have orgasms while nursing them and regularly masturbate them.
One three-year-old boy describes how whenever his mother was sad or angry
she masturbated him so roughly that it hurt him, and he struggled to get
away, complaining of a pain in his penis. "It hurts inside,² he told the
ethnologist. "It goes Œkoong, koong, koong' inside. I think it bleeds in
there I don't like to touch it anymore. It hurts when I pee...² Sometimes,
after his mother hurt him while masturbating him, he wounds himself in the
thigh and abdomen with a sharp stick and draws blood, looking at his penis
and saying, "Now it hurts here, outside, not in penis. Look, blood. Feels
good...² Although he is only three years old, he understands quite well
that he is being used as a poison container by his mother to relieve her
depression. He says, "Mother twist penis, tight...Hurt inside...Mother
angry, hurt Buuktiin's penis. Mother sad, hurt Buuktiin's penis...Mother
not like Buuktiin's penis, want to cut off..."
Maternal incest and
pederasty by men are quite common in pre-literate groups and were common in earlier
historical times. Boys in many New Guinea groups today, for instance, are
so traumatized by the early erotic experiences, neglect and assaults on
their bodies that they need to prove their masculinity when they grow up
and become fierce warriors and cannibals, with a third of them dying in
raids and wars. In fact, I have found that rather than the incest taboo
being universal--as anthropologists claim--it is incest itself that has
been universal for most children in most cultures in most times. A
childhood more or less free from adult sexual use is in fact a very late
historical achievement, limited to a few fortunate children in a few
modern nations. To give you some idea of the extensive evidence I have
gathered for such an unlikely conclusion, I would like to begin by
summarizing the evidence which exists for the sexual abuse of children
around the world today.
Back
to the Top
In
America, the most accurate scientific studies, based on lengthy
interviews, report that 30 percent of men and 40 percent of women remember
having been sexually molested during childhood---defining "molestation" as
actual genital contact, not just exposure. About half of these are
directly incestuous, with the family members, the other half usually being
with others, but with the complicity of caretakers in at least 80 percent
of the cases. These experiences of seduction are not just pieced together
from fragmentary memories, but are remembered in detail, are usually for
an extended period of time and have been confirmed by follow-up
reliability studies in 83 percent of the cases, so they are unlikely to
have been fantasies. The seductions occurred at much earlier ages than had
been previously assumed, with 81 percent occurring before puberty and an
astonishing 42 percent under age 7. As high as these molestation rates
seem, however, they represent only a portion of the true rates, not only
because those interviewed do not include populations that have been shown
to have extremely high rates---such as criminals, prostitutes, juveniles
in shelters, psychotics, etc.--but also because only conscious memories
were counted, and the earliest seductions of children are almost never
remembered except during psychotherapy. Adjusting statistically for what
is known about these additional factors, I have concluded that the real
sexual abuse rate for America is 60 percent for girls and 45 percent for
boys, about half of these directly incestuous.
Other Western
nations have made fewer careful studies. A recent Canadian study by Gallup of 2,000 adults has produced
incidence rates almost exactly the same as those found in the United
States. Latin American family sexual activity--particularly widespread
pederasty as part of macho sexuality--is considered even more widespread.
In England, a recent BBC "ChildWatch" program asked its female
listeners--a large though admittedly biased sample--if they remembered
sexual molestation, and, of the 2,530 replies analyzed, 83 percent
remembered someone touching their genitals, 62 percent recalling actual
intercourse. In Germany, the Institute für Kindheit has recently concluded
a survey asking West Berlin school children about their sexual
experiences, and 80 percent reported having been molested.
Back
to the Top
Outside the West, the sexual molestation of children is a routine
practice in most families. Childhood in India begins,
according to observers, with the child being regularly masturbated by the
mother, the girl "to make her sleep well," the boy "to make him manly."
The child sleeps in the family bed, witnesses and most likely takes part
in sexual intercourse between the parents. The child is often "borrowed"
to sleep with other members of the extended household, leading to the
Indian proverb that "For a girl to be a virgin at ten years old, she must
have neither brothers nor cousin nor father." Childhood is so eroticized
that, as one Western observer put it, "The little Hindu girls are
deflowered by the little boys with whom they play, and repeat together the
erotic lessons which their parents have unwittingly taught them on account
of the general promiscuity of family life throughout India. In all the
little girls of less than ten years of age the complete hymen is
wanting...Incest is often the rule rather than the exception."
Child marriage was, of course, a long-standing Indian practice.
When laws were passed in 1929 trying to outlaw it, the government was
overwhelmed by men insisting that early marriage was an absolute
necessity, since little girls were naturally very sexual and must be
married early if they are to be restrained from seducing adults. "Cupid
overtakes the hearts of girls...at an early age," they said. "A girl's
desire for sexual intercourse is eight times greater than that of males."
Indian mothers also often supported early marriage, frankly admitting it
was necessary in order to protect their little girls against rape in the
family, saying that "they were afraid to leave their daughters at home,
even for one afternoon, without a mother's eye and accessible to the men
of the family."
The Indian subcontinent, in fact, still has many
groups, such as the Baiga, where actual incestuous marriage is practiced,
between fathers and daughters, between mothers and sons, between siblings
and even between grandparents and their grandchildren--thus disproving the
oft-repeated anthropological truism that "no known tribe has ever
permitted incest" because if it were allowed society would surely cease
functioning. In many of these villages, the children move at the age of 5
or 6 from the incestuous activities of the family bed to spend the rest of
their childhood in sex dormitories, where they are initiated by older
youth and men into intercourse with a succession of other children, none
for longer than three days at a time, under threat of gang rape.
Back
to the Top
Childhood in China has historically had the same
institutionalized rape rituals as in India, including the pederasty of
boys, child concubinage, the castration of boys to be used sexually as
eunuchs, marriage of young girls to a number of brothers, widespread boy
and girl prostitution and the regular sexual use of child servants and
slaves. So prevalent was the rape of little girls that Western doctors
found that, as in India, few girls entering puberty had intact hymens.
Even the universal practice of foot binding was for sexual purposes, with
a girl undergoing extremely painful crushing of the bones of her feet for
years in order that men could make love to her big toe as a fetish, a
penis-substitute.
Childhood in contemporary Japan, although somewhat more Western than that of other
Eastern nations, still includes masturbation by mothers "to put them to
sleep." Parents often have intercourse with their children in bed with
them, and "co-sleeping," with parents physically embracing the child,
often continues until the child is ten or fifteen. One recent Japanese
study found daughters sleeping with their fathers over 20 percent of the
time after age 16. Recent sex surveys report memories of sexual abuse even
higher than comparable American studies, and "hot lines" of sexual abuse
report mother-son incest in almost a third of the calls, the mother saying
to her teenage son, "It's not good to do it alone. Your IQ becomes lower.
I will help you, " or "You cannot study if you cannot have sex. You may
use my body," or "I don't want you to get into trouble with a girl. Have
sex with me instead." Historically, Japan has been one of the most
endogamous societies in the world, with incestuous marriages in court
circles being approved even in historical times and preferred sibling,
cousin, uncle-niece and aunt-nephew marriages having been so extensive
that genetics experts have discovered that the incestuous inbreeding has
affected the size and health of the Japanese. Even today, there are rural
areas in Japan where fathers marry their daughters when the mother has
died or is incapacitated, "in accordance with feudal family traditions."
The sexual use of children in the Near East
is as widespread as in the Far East. Historically, all the
institutionalized forms of pedophilia which were customary in the Far East
are documented extensively for the Near East, including child marriage,
child concubinage, temple prostitution of both boys and girls,
parent-child marriage (among the Zoroastrians), sibling marriage (quite
common among Egyptians), sex slavery, ritualized pederasty and child
prostitution. Masturbation in infancy is said to be necessary "to increase
the size" of the penis, and older siblings are reported to play with the
genitals of babies for hours at a time. Mutual masturbation, fellatio and
anal intercourse are also said to be common among children, particularly
with the older boys using younger children as sex objects. The nude public
baths (hammam) are particularly eroticized in many areas, being especially
notorious as a place of homosexual acts, both male and female.
Back
to the Top
Girls are used incestuously even more often than boys, since
females are valued so little. One report found 80 percent of Near Eastern women surveyed recalled having been forced
into fellatio between the ages of 3 and 6 by older brothers, cousins,
uncles and teachers. The girls rarely complain, since "if there is any
punishment to be meted out, it will always end up by being inflicted on
her." Arab women know that their spouses are pedophiles and prefer having
sex with children to having sex with them. Their retribution comes as
follows. When the girl is about 6 years old,
the women of the house grab her, pull her thighs apart and cut off her
clitoris and often also her labia with a razor, thus usually ending her
ability to feel sexual pleasure forever. One Egyptian woman relates her
memory of how it happened to her. After being used sexually by the men in
her family during her early childhood, she says:
I was six
years old that night when I lay in my bed, warm and peaceful...I felt
something move under the blankets, something like a huge hand...another
hand was clapped over my mouth to prevent me from screaming.
They
carried me to the bathroom...I remember...a rasping metallic sound which
reminded me of the butcher when he used to sharpen his knife...My blood
was frozen in my veins...my thighs had been pulled wide apart...I felt
that the rasping knife or blade was heading straight down towards my
throat. Then suddenly the sharp metallic edge seemed to drop between my
thighs and there cut off a piece of flesh from my body.
I screamed
with pain despite the tight hand held over my mouth, for the pain was not
just a pain, it was like a searing flame that went through my whole body.
After a few moments, I saw a red pool of blood around my hips. I did not
know what they had cut off from my body, and did not try to find out. I
just wept, and called out to my mother for help. But the worst shock of
all was when I looked around and found her standing by my side. Yes, it
was her, I could not be mistaken, in flesh and blood, right in the midst
of these strangers, talking to them and smiling at them.
A
recent survey of Egyptian girls and women showed 97 percent of uneducated
families and 66 percent of educated families still practiced
clitoridectomy. Nor is the practice decreasing--UN reports estimate that
more than 74 million females have been mutilated, with "more female
children mutilated today than throughout history."
Clitoridectomy,
like all sexual mutilations, is, I believe, an act of incest. If it is
incest when a father rapes a daughter, it is also incest when parents
assault their children by cutting off, sewing up, burning, flaying or
gashing their genitals. In all these cases, the child is being used for
the sadistic sexual pleasure of the parent. In fact, circumcision
ceremonies are often followed by drinking parties that end in intercourse,
so sexually arousing is the circumcision---in some areas, the traveling
circumcizer is actually accompanied by some prostitutes, who know how
sexually excited villages become after the ceremony. Therefore, the
practice of sexually mutilating children's genitals---one of the most
widespread rituals in the world--by itself makes incest a near-universal
trait.
Back
to the Top
Historically, the routine use of children as poison containers to
prevent adults from feeling overwhelmed by their anxieties has also been
universal. Examples from the history of childhood regularly reveal
children are expected to "absorb" the bad feelings of their caretakers. As
one peasant community in rural Greece puts it, you must have children
around to put your bad feelings into, especially when the "Bad Hour" comes
around. An informant describes the process as follows:
One of the
ways for the Bad Hour to occur is when you get angry. When you're angry a
demon gets inside of you. Only if a pure individual passes by, like a
child for instance, will the "bad" leave you, for it will fall on the
unpolluted.
Newborn infants, in particular, were perfect poison
containers because they were so "unpolluted." The newborn then became so
full of the parent's projections that even if he or she is allowed to live
(up to half the children in early societies were murdered at birth), the
infant had to be tied up--tightly swaddled in bandages for up to a year or
more---to prevent it from "tearing its ears off, scratching its eyes out,
breaking its legs, or touching its genitals," i.e., to prevent it from
acting out the violent and sexual projections of the parents.
Children were particularly useful as poison containers when adults
felt anxious about recent or impending success. Success stirs up superego
retaliation, and the sacrifice of children to appease the gods--that is,
the punitive parents--was an extremely widespread guilt-reducing device.
Most early states practiced child sacrifice. Typical was Carthage, where a
large cemetery has been discovered called The Tophet filled with over
20,000 urns deposited there between 400 and 200 B.C. The urns contained
bones of children sacrificed by their parents, who often would make a vow
to kill their next child if the gods would grant them a favor--for
instance, if their shipment of goods were to arrive safely in a foreign
port. Some urns contain the bones of stillborn babies along with the bones
of two-year-olds, indicating that if the promised child was not born
alive, an older child had also to be killed to satisfy the promise. The
sacrifice was accompanied by a music, wild dancing and riotous orgy, and
was probably accompanied by the ritual rape of virgin girls, as it was
with the Incans. Plutarch told how the priests would "cut their throats as
if they were so many lambs or young birds; meanwhile the mother stood by
without a tear or moan [while] the whole area before the statue was filled
with a loud noise of flutes and drums..." Sacrifice, rape and genital
mutilation of young girls continues to take place today in the Andean
mountains, particularly to ward off the guilt coming after successful
cocaine deliveries. These ceremonies, from antiquity to today, resemble
closely the satanic rituals made familiar recently in the newspapers,
using the infliction of rape, sexual mutilation and other horrors in order
to visit upon child victims elements of the traumas of the satanists' own
childhood.
That child sacrifice was carried
out mainly by the rich in each of these early societies confirms my theory
that it is a guilt-reducing technique. Whenever new ventures were begun,
children would be sacrificed. Whenever a new building or bridge was built,
a child would be buried within it as a "foundation sacrifice." Children
still play at capturing a child and making it part of the bridge in
"London Bridge's Falling Down." Children's bodies were particularly useful
in curing disease. Whatever one's physical ills, a child could be used to
"absorb" the poison that was responsible. When, for instance, one wanted
to be cured of leprosy, one was supposed to kill a child and wash one's
body in its blood. When one wanted to find out if a house whose previous
occupants had died of plague was still infected or not, one rented some
children to live in it for several weeks to see if they died--rather like
the use of canaries in mines to detect poisonous gas. When one was
impotent, depressed or had venereal disease, doctors prescribed having
intercourse with a child. As late as the end of the nineteenth century,
men who were brought into Old Bailey for having raped young girls were let
go because "they believed that they were curing themselves of venereal
disease." Raping virgins was particularly effective for impotence and
depression; as one medical book put it, "Breaking a maiden's seal is one
of the best antidotes for one's ills. Cudgeling her unceasingly, until she
swoons away, is a might remedy for man's depression. It cures all
impotence." And, of course, whenever a parent had a disease, they always
had their children handy to absorb the poison. Thus British doctors in the
nineteenth century regularly found when visiting men who had venereal
disease that their children also had the same disease--on their mouths,
anuses or genitals.
Back
to the Top
No matter what anxieties one had, one had children always at hand
to use to relieve them. The evolution of childhood from incest to love and
from abuse to empathy has been a slow, uneven path, but one whose
progressive direction is, I think, unmistakable. This evolution of
parent-child relations is, I contend, an independent source of historical
change, lying in the ability of successive generations of parents to live
through their own childhood traumas a second time and work through their
anxieties in a slightly better manner this second time around. It is in
this sense that I say that history is like psychotherapy, which also heals
through revisiting one's childhood traumas and reworking earlier
anxieties. If the parent--the mother, for most of history--is given even
the most minimal support by society, the evolution of childhood
progresses, new variations in historical personality are formed, and
history begins to move in new, innovative directions.
The crucial relationship in this evolution is the
mother-daughter relationship. If little girls are treated particularly
badly, they grow up to be mothers who cannot rework their traumas, and
history is frozen. For instance, although China was ahead of the West in
most ways during the pre-Christian era, it became "frozen" and fell far
behind the West in evolutionary social and technological change after it
adopted the practice of footbinding girls. Similarly, the cliterodectomy
of girls in Moslem societies has inhibited their social development for
centuries, since it likewise puts a brake on the ability of the next
generation of mothers to make progress in caring for their children.
Clearly, different groups have moved different distances up the ladder of
psychological evolution, since some contemporary groups still practice
brain-eating as our Paleolithic ancestors did, and different subgroups of
our more advanced nations still terrorize and abuse their children in ways
identical to those that were commonplace centuries ago, producing the
"historical fossils" (early "psychoclasses") we now call borderline
personalities and other severe character disorders. Your neighbor is as
likely to be a result of medieval parenting as of modern parenting, so
modern societies contain a full range of childrearing modes and
psychoclasses. The "generational pressure" for psychological change is not
only an independent historical force--originating in inborn adult-child
striving for relationship--it occurs independent of social and
technological change, and can be found even in periods of economic
stagnation. My "psychogenic theory of history" posits that a society's childrearing practices are not just one item in a list
of cultural traits, but--because all other traits must be passed down from
generation to generation through the narrow funnel of childhood--instead
makes childrearing the very basis for the transmission and development of
all other cultural traits, placing definite limits on what can be achieved
in the material spheres of history. The main source of childhood evolution
is, I believe, the process I call psychogenesis, by which parents--mainly
the mother for most of history--revisit a second time around the stages of
childhood and undo to some extent the traumas they themselves endured. It
is in this sense that history is like a psychotherapy of the generations,
undoing trauma and giving historical personality a chance at a new start
with every baby born. Only humans have brain networks that allow this
miracle to take place. All cultural changes in the past 100,000 years of
Homo sapiens sapiens are epigenetic, not genetic. Regardless of changes in
the environment, it is only when changes in childhood occur that
epigenetic changes in the brain can occur and societies can begin to
progress and move in unpredictable new directions that are more adaptive.
That more individuated and loving individuals are ultimately more adaptive
is understandable--because they are less under the pressures of infantile
traumas and are therefore more rational in reaching their goals. But that
this childhood evolution--and therefore all social evolution--is terribly
uneven is also understandable, given the varying conditions under which
parents all over the world have to conduct their childrearing tasks.
Continue
Back
to the Top
Information about the annual National Parenting Conference can be
obtained by writing Robert McFarland, M.D., 2300 Kalmia, Boulder, CO
80304.
Lloyd deMause is Director of The Institute for
Psychohistory, Editor of The Journal of Psychohistory and
President of The International Psychohistorical Association and can
be reached at 140 Riverside Drive, New York, New York 10024. He is author
of The History of Childhood, Foundations of Psychohistory,and
Reagan's America.
BIBLIOGRAPHIC NOTE This article is
based upon extensive primary source material fully referenced in the over
600 footnotes contained in the following sources:
1. Lloyd
deMause, "The Evolution of Childhood." in his Foundations of
Psychohistory. New York: Creative Roots, 1982. 2. _____________ "On
Writing Childhood History." The Journal of Psychohistory 16 (1988):
135-171. 3. _____________"The History of Child Assault." The Journal
of Psychohistory 18(1990): 1-29. 4. _____________"The Universality of
Incest." The Journal of Psychohistory 19 (1991):123-164.
|