|
Manifesto
for a cultural psychology
Cor Baerveldt (1996)
Although
in Nijmegen cultural psychology has a history that goes back to
the late fifties, only recently cultural psychology emerged as a
commonly acknowledged field of scientific research. Crucial has
been the growing insight, especially since the early eighties, that
individual development and identity are both constituted by and
constitutive for cultural mores and practices. Already anthropologists
and cross-cultural psychologists had extensively demonstrated that
patterns of human feeling, thinking and acting show considerable
variation across cultures. Although cultural psychology acknowledges
the insights of the other social sciences, it puts itself to the
task of explaining how cultural patterns 'penetrate', as it were,
into the experiential world of individuals, in a way that makes
them maintain those very same patterns in their own behavior. The
fundamental paradox that comprises the key problem of cultural
psychology is, that especially when people are most authentically
themselves, we can observe their behavior to be socially patterned.
Cultural
psychology tries to look across the traditional borders that separate
the various social sciences. This means that, to a large extend,
a new language has to be invented that goes beyond the jargon of
specific disciplines. Cultural psychology shares most of its concerns
with schools and (sub)disciplines like social constructionism, discursive
psychology, Bourdieuian sociology and the Russian culture historical
school of Vygotsky. Although up till now there exists no generally
approved research program for cultural psychology, a few concerns
can be mentioned that go beyond individual programs:
- Cultural
psychology is critical with respect to psychology's one-sided,
"self contained" individualism. The dominant Western concept of
the self, that forms the basis for most psychological thinking,
is exposed to be a rather local affair against the background
of the worldwide variety of "indigenous psychologies". Especially
psychology's claim that it explores and discovers universal principles
of psychological functioning is challenged. Psychological processes
are considered to be inextricably bound up with local practices
and conventions.
- Cultural
psychology tries to break through traditional epistemological
boundaries that divide the person from his or her life-world,
mind from body and mental states from human action. It can be
viewed as an attempt to provide a theory of meaningful action
that takes into account that meaning is both socially constituted
and at the same time embodied in concrete, human activity. Consensually
coordinated actions, for example, produce dispositions to think,
feel and act in such a way that existing relations of power and
influence are reproduced. Cultural psychology therefore, tries
to understand the influence of class, sex and ethnicity in the
psychological domain.
- Cultural
psychology favors research methods that are "ecologically valid":
Central is the investigation of meaning as it is constructed,
negotiated, sustained and disputed in everyday social interactions.
Its methods include those which traditionally fall outside the
repertoire of psychological research, like the ethnographic interview,
or participant observation. In its research, cultural psychology
tries to systematically account for patterns of human experience
and interaction. To that end the NCPG is developing new research
tools by means of which culturally framed meaning-giving activities
of individuals can be approached.
The
NCPG studies the patterning of behavior as it takes place in a variety
of domains. Domains that have our special attentions are youth culture,
male-female relationships, sexual behavior, the construction of
a philosophy of life, and the contemporary development of new religious
forms and ways of giving sense to one's personal life. The research
projects of the individual members of the NCPG give a fair impression
of what our present concerns are.
|