ISSN: 1496-0869
Volume 7 Issue 1
Published March 2007

Hand-numbered print run of 100 copies; 82 pages
Contributors:
Stephanie Black -- Amy Bronson
  -- Lloyd Flaig  -- Meghan Gerhart -- Paul Gerhart -- Blaine Greenwood --
Lori Hahnel -- Vivian Hansen -- Frances Hern-- Rebecca Holand -- Barb Howard --
-- Fred Stenson--
 Shaun Hunter --John Johansen -- Lesley Little -- Laura Nelson -- Kamal Parmar-- 
Jon Redfern --Shannon Pahara --Ginger Rozmus -- Richard Stevenson -- Diana Stokes -- Dee Sweet-Greenwood --Jennifer Tomomitsu -- Yvonne Trainer -- Rosalee van Stelton --Gillian Watkinson

 

[The Navigation Bar feature is not available in this web]

An Interview with Fred Stenson
(excerpt)

Rags: You’ve been the director of the Wired Writing Studio for seven years, an online program “designed to be a twin of the five-week studio,” offered at the Banff Centre each spring. Can tell us more about it?

 Fred: It consists of two weeks of residency at Banff in the fall, and another twenty weeks of on-line. Each participant (of 22) is teamed with one mentor, with whom they will work for the full period on one book-length poetry or prose project. To keep the sense of community that develops among the writers in Banff going through the winter, we have an on-line discussion forum where news is exchanged and topics are discussed.

 Rags: So in other words the online program makes it accessible to those writers who are unable to attend a five-week residency at Banff. What about the web itself? Will it prove to be a paradigm change for or an adjunct to written communication?  

Fred: The Web is already the writers' best tool, in my opinion. A better thing could not have been designed for writers: quick access to a host of facts, and, beyond facts, to things like opinion, accent, human quirks and obsessions

 

Rags:  You write in several genres -- historical fiction, social/political commentary, and of course humour. How do you organize your writing projects?

 Fred: The variety of my work has suited the kind of grasshopper mind I have. Frustration sets in when a project becomes very long, and I have other ideas I can't get to. As said for the previous question, I have depended on the stimulation that comes with variety to make more variety.  

I started writing humorous fiction. That was not a wide enough field to make a living in, so I branched out wherever I could find a fit. This led into documentary films (education, historical, industrial, nature).

I've done over 140 documentaries, starting in 1976. They have been all over the place in subject matter. The ones I look back on with most pride include: Landscapes, a film series about Alberta's landscape regions that won several awards in the early '80s; Ranch Cowboy, an hour about the tribe of career cowboys on ranches, hosted by Ian Tyson; World of Horses, 27 episodes about different horse occupations, narrated by movie wrangler John Scott; The Great March, a History TV feature docu-drama about the North West Mounted Police march west in 1874,  

The breadth of subjects in the documentary business gave me many subjects I could write about in fiction--which led to non-fiction books and historical fiction. Then, it was back to humour in magazine form. But it was film and documentary writing provided much of the income that allowed me to live by my writing alone. But currently, it is my fiction writing (historical fiction) that is my daily work. I feel fortunate to have the chance to write fiction every day. Fiction is what I do full time now--at present, as opposed to forever--and this is a gift. Earlier in my career, the fiction (which did not pay for itself) was often done without recompense.