Chapter 12 Speedy
Democratization
Taiwan Relation
Act
In July 1971, Henry Kisssinger, special assistant to
the U.S. president, secretly visited China and announced President Nixon's
plan to visit China. Three
months later, Taiwan withdrew from the United Nations.
Japan severed its diplomatic relations with Taiwan in September
1972; since then Taiwan had met with the trouble of diplomatic severances
one after another, whereby in international community the tables were
turned in China's favor. The
fictions of "Republic of
China (Taiwan) is the One and Only China" and "Kuomintang regime
is the Legitimate Government of China" gave way at last.
Taiwan had taken the path of diplomatic isolation just as being
called a "world orphan", and by April 1993, it had kept
diplomatic relations with only 29 small countries, which totaled only 1%
of world population.
"Taiwan Relation Act", which consists of 18 articles, put great
emphasis on America's relations with "Taiwan residents" rather
than Kuomintang regime. The
scope of its application covers only Taiwan and Penghu (the Pescadores)
Islands, and does not extend to Kimoy or Matsu that are controlled by
Kuomintang regime. Furthermore,
it has been clarified that "Taiwanese Government Authorities"
means the government authorities present and its successor.
From these matters one can see clearly that the United States
Government, by excluding Kimoy and Matsu from Taiwanese territory,
intended to apply this law even under the succeeding government of
Kuomintang regime. Therefore,
when "Taiwan Relation Act" was enacted, Kuomintang regime
resisted it at first, but later changed its position towards this law from
a more realistic point of view, and expected other countries such as Japan
and Philippine to follow the U.S. in making similar Taiwan relation laws. The binding power on the U.S. or Taiwan may be weak because "Taiwan Relation Act" is a domestic law; it did not only substitute for "Sino-American Mutual Defense Treaty", but also expanded with wide range of themes. The principal parts are: (1) To maintain peace, security and stability of western Pacific region; (2) To maintain various relations with Taiwan; (3) To resolve Taiwan issues peacefully; (4) To remove any boycott or blockade against Taiwan; (5) To supply Taiwan with defense weapons; (6) To remove any use of force or pressure against Taiwan; (7) To protect human rights of Taiwan residents, etc. This explains that "Taiwan Relation Act" has taken into consideration the armed aggression of China against Taiwan and the human rights suppression on Taiwan residents by the Kuomintang regime. Item C, Article 2 of "Taiwan Relation Act" writes that besides defending Taiwan from China’s armed aggression, “the U.S. object is to promote the human rights of all Taiwan residents”. Based on this, "Democracy for Taiwan" was included in the "Foreign Affair Empowering Act" (For fiscal year of 1986-87) signed by President Reagan in August 1985. It emphasized that the continuing support of democratization movement in Taiwan has become America's moral and legal obligations specified in Taiwan Relation Act. Based on the above Act, the United States urged Kuomintang regime to move vigorously toward this goal". All these had contributed greatly to the democratization in Taiwan later. Although there was no diplomatic relation between the two countries, the United States has recognized Taiwan as a quasi-sovereign "Political Substance", and not only supplied defense weapons but also opened American market to Taiwan. Moreover, on Sino-Taiwan relation, the United States Senate adopted a "Resolution regarding the future of Taiwan" in July 1989, which stated "The future of Taiwan must be resolved peacefully without any threat and in a form acceptable by the Taiwan residents.... the relations between the People's Republic of China and the United States depends upon whether the Chinese Government would give up the armed aggression on Taiwan." In the international community where Taiwan is isolated under unavoidable circumstances, the Kuomintang regime relies too much on the United States to ignore the request for democratization. Formation
of Opposition Party and
Abolition of Martial Laws By 1970's, the Taiwanese leaders who grew up after "Feb.28 Incident" started pushing for democratization domestically in the name of "Dan-Wai" (a political group other than Kuomintang), while oversea students in the U.S. and Japan supported them by asserting independence for Taiwan abroad. The Taiwanese in the United States lobbied continuously in the U.S. Senate, which showed its support by calling various public hearings on "Taiwan Relation Act", etc. This had further encouraged "Dan-Wai" in Taiwan. The "Kaohsiung Incident" on December 10, 1979 (An assembly commemorating International Human Rights Day was suppressed as rebellion), the "Murder of Dr. Chen Wen-chen" in July 1981 (An Associate Professor of Carnegie Melon University, who was murdered while on a home-coming visit to Taiwan), and the "Murder of Chiang Nan" in October 1984 (A nationalized American writer who, authored the Biography of Chiang Ching-kuo, was murdered at his home in San Francisco), etc., which demonstrated cruel suppression and killing of the Taiwanese people angered the American citizens and were even criticized by pro-Kuomintang President Reagan. Owing to untiring efforts by the Taiwanese home and abroad, and impact from these incidents helped in gaining increased understandings and supports from American citizens and the U.S. Congress, and had become the great driving force of democratization in Taiwan.
"Dan-wai Editors" and "Public Policy Study Group" started to prepare organizing a political party. On the other hand, five influential men in the U.S. Senate and House of Representatives, namely Claiborne Pell, Edward M. Kennedy, Stephen Solarz, James Leach and Robert Torricelli, organized a “Committee for promoting democracy in Taiwan” to push Kuomintang regime for political reform. They pointed out that “The martial law in Taiwan is unnecessary, since America is assuring Taiwan’s security”, and appealed strongly to lift the martial law, warning: “If Kuomintang neglected the democratization, it will result in a more violent method of resolution”. In addition, the Sub-committees of Asian Pacific and Human Rights in the Congress passed the “Taiwan Democratization Act” demanded that Kuomintang regime should: (1) Allow the formation of new political party; (2) Abolish censorship and assure freedom of speech, assembly and association; and (3) Realize a complete and democratic parliamentary system. Moreover, in August, five influential Congressmen of Democratic Party joined in signing a petition to Mr. Schultz, the Secretary of State, urging him to work on the Kuomintang regime in allowing a new political party. All these actions in the U.S. Congress were the results of lobbying by the Taiwanese who resided in the U.S., and were part of their supports for preparation of a new political party in Taipei. Finally, on September 28, 135 initiators gathered at Grand Hotel in Taipei, and the first opposition party after the war, the “Democratic Progressive Party” (DPP) was born.
On July 15,
1987, under the mounting pressures from the U.S. Senate, State Department, and the Taiwanese
democratization movement, home and abroad, the Kuomintang regime at
last dissolved the martial law that had been in force continuously for
38 years, but put the “National Security Act under State
of Emergency” (Hereafter referred as “National Security Act”) in force
instead.
LeeTeng-huiAssumed the Presidency and Party BossOn December 25, 1987, when the Komintang regime’s authoritarian rule was in the decline, Democratic Progressive Party gathered about 30,000 citizens and held a demonstration meeting in Taipei demanding an all-out re-election of the Parliament. On this day, a ceremony “Commemorating the Constitution’s 40th Anniversary” was taking place in Chung-shan Memorial Hall, and in the midst of Chiang Ching-kuo’s speech, 11 Democratic Progressive Party representatives stood up chanting “All-out re-election of the Parliament” for twenty minutes and left the meeting. President Chiang Ching-kuo was standing speechless with astonishment. It was an impressive sight to see how the Kuomintang’s control power and President Chiang’s absolute existence had withered. On January 1, 1988, the ”Newspaper Ban”, prohibition on publishing new daily newspaper, which had been going on for so long, was finally abolished. Although this was a pre-arranged policy, newly published neutral newspapers were no match for the Kuomintang newspapers, which had become giants by monopolizing the market under martial law. Nevertheless, the abolition of paper ban was one step forward to democratization.
Although Chiang Ching-kuo promoted Lee Teng-hui to be
the Vice President, he did not think about appointing him as successor.
It was only necessary to compromise with the Taiwanese people, who
were 86% of Taiwan’s population, that Taiwanese was appointed as Vice
President. In other words, it
was an “Ornament” Vice-President.
Just as he admitted himself, Lee Teng-hui was appointed because of
his “Sincere and Honest” personality; and he was chosen for his
“safety degree”, not being an ambitious man.
Contrary to Chiang Ching-kuo’s will, Lee Teng-hui’s elevation
to the President was the result of his sudden death and none other.
Therefore, Sung Mei-lin, the widow of Chiang Kai-shek, and the
party powers centered in the Mainland elders were opposed to Lee
Teng-hui’s assumption of Party Chairman, even though it was unavoidable
to promote him to the President. Moreover,
like the way when Chiang Kai-shek died, they insisted “the separation of
President and Party Chairman”, and intended to make Lee Teng-hui a
“robot president”. However, after the
death of Chiang Ching-kuo, the political environment in Taiwan was that
Taiwanese influence had gained ground considerably, and was in a situation
not able to tolerate making Lee Teng-hui a robot.
In the 13th Kuomintang Party Convention in July 1988,
Lee Teng-hui was elected the Party Chairman; hereupon Lee had assumed the
positions of President and Party Chairman.
Nevertheless, this does not mean that he had obtained the control
of “Party”, “Administration”, “Military”, and “Secret
police” organizations of the Kuomintang regime. The Personality of Lee Teng-hui
One can see that being
born the son of small landlord family, Lee Teng-hui coherently specialized
in the study of agricultural economy, and had held strong concern and
problematic consciousness toward agriculture. In those days, most of the Taiwan students in Japan aimed for
Tokyo Imperial University, but he insisted on choosing the Department of
Agriculture of Kyoto Imperial University, which is highly reputed for its
liberal academic traditions, wherefrom one can catch a glimpse of young
Lee Teng-hui’s trend of thought. Moreover,
he went twice to study in the United States where he encountered the
assassination incident of Rev. King, leader of the movement for
emancipation of black people, and was said to have received grave shock
and influences from it. Certainly,
like most of Taiwanese politicians under the Kuomintang regime, Lee
Teng-hui did not insist his own opinion and had shown an obedient posture,
before he took office as the President.
However, not only being a Taiwanese but also young in party
history, though assuming the positions of President and Party Chairman and
without the control of “Party”, “Administration”, “Military”
and “Secret police”, Lee Teng-hui was by no means a “robot” that
the Mainlander party elders expected.
Moreover, with the support of the majority of Taiwanese and their
anticipation, Lee Teng-hui had overcome difficulties and realized his
political conviction step by step. Lee Teng-hui’s Power Control
In
the power structure of Kuomintang regime, among “Party”,
“Administration”, “Military” and “Secret police”, Sung
Sin-lien, the Chief of National Security Bureau, concurrently the big boss
of Secret Police and Information Agency, was loyal to the new President
Lee Teng-hui, and took positive attitude towards “Separation of
Information and Peace-keeping”, one of Lee Teng-hui’s democratization
policies. Sung Sin-lien, an
army general and a Mainlander, was a good example to show that Lee
Teng-hui had no intention to give cold shoulder to Mainlanders, while
driving for democratization and power control. At
the outset, President Lee Teng-hui reshuffled the late President Chiang
Ching-kuo’s secretary Shen Chhang-hoan, an elder of the previous era,
who had a strong voice in diplomacy, and replaced him with Lee Yuan-tzu,
the previous Minister of Justice, who was reputed to be a “Man of
Silence”. This removed the
obstacle of the “Practical Diplomacy” (Also is called “flexible”
or “realistic” diplomacy), which The term of 7th President was expiring in May 1990. At
the beginning, Kuomintang Party agreed to put Li Teng-hui forward as the
8th President, but Li Teng-hui strongly defied Administrative Yuan Chief
Li Hoan and National Security Council Secretary Chiang Wei-kuo, the the
second son of Chiang Kai-sek, who were both strongly expecting the
position of Vice-President. In
December 1989, Party Chairman announced at his own decision to name Lee
Yuan-tzu as the candidate for Vice-President. Because of this, the Mainlander party elders revolted against
the decision, and as a result, hostility between the “Mainstream
Faction” (Reformist Faction) which centered Lee Teng-hui and the
“Non-Mainstream Faction” (Conservertist Faction) became more and more
conspicuous. The nomination for the
8th President and Vice-President was done in the extraordinary general
session of Kuomintang Party’s Central Committee on February 11, 1990. In
this general session, the Non-Mainstream Faction advocated “Democracy
within the Party”, saying to make decision by standing up or raising
hands is undemocratic, and asserted secret ballot.
Finally, of the total 180 Central Committee members, 169 who
attended the session voted down the secret ballot by 99 to 70. If
the secret ballot was approved at that time, the nomination of Lee
Teng-hui and Lee Yuan-tzu for President and Vice-Ppresident might not be
realized. This is why it was
called the “Miscarried Coup d’Etat”.
It should be noticed that pro-democratization “Mainstream
Faction” persisted in the decision method by standing up or raising
hand, while anti-democratization “Non-Mainstream Faction“ asserted the
more democratic secret ballot. Lee Teng-hui was
inaugurated as the 8th President in May 1990, and the tenure of the
Presidency was six years till May 1996. Lee
Teng-hui had repeatedly stated upon assuming the presidency that he had no
intention to run again after his term expired.
At first, it looked as if he would become a “lame duck”,
however, not only there was no such sign at all, but on the contrary he
became a President with power both in name and in reality, propelling
powerful reforms. In June, immediately after assuming the office of the 8th
President, he reshuffled Administrative Yuan Chief Li Hoan, and appointed
Defense Minister Hao Po-chun as the new Chief of Administrative Yuan, In December 1992, the
second election of the legislators took place, and the Opposition
Democratic Progressive Party made a breakthrough by winning 52 out of 161
seats. In the election,
needless to mention the Opposition, even the Mainstream Faction candidates
of Kuomintang criticized the
Administrative Yuan Chief Hao Po-chun and demanded his resignation. Li Teng-hui reshuffled Hao Po-chun as if supported by the
Opposition Party, appointed his confidant Lien Tsan as new chief of
Administrative Yuan, and finally managed to control the
“Administration”. While he was at it, Lee Teng-hui also reshuffled and assigned
Hsu Sui-teh, ambassador to Japan, as the Party Secretary. In March 1993, Hsu Sui-teh Lee Teng-hui’s Democratic
Reform
Observing Li Teng-hui's political style so far, his
political beliefs can be integrated and summarized as: (1) Party should
not precede the nation; (2) The troop must not be "the troop of the
party", but should be "the troop of the nation"; (3)
Democratic politics is political party politics, it should not be one
party dictatorship; (4) Taiwan should not be isolated in the international
community, practical diplomacy should be promoted; (5) Must avoid conflict
with Chinese government or Communist regime; (6) Political prisoners only
exist in the developing countries, it is a disgrace to the democratic
country. If these were
realized in Taiwan, that is exactly what is called “A revolution without
bloodshed”. But ironically,
in order to realize his own political belief, it was necessary for Li
Teng-hui to contradict himself in invoking the state power as the
undemocratic “revolutional party” Kuomintang chairman, to whom the
power was concentrated.
In April 1988, soon after
Li Teng-hui assumed the Presidency, in defying the heavy pressures from
Kuomintang’s elders, he mitigated and released a part of the political
prisoners at the opportunity of commemorating the 100th day of
Chiang Ching-kuo’s death. In
February 1989, he made a state visit to Singapore as President. This time
an arrangement was made beforehand with the Singaporean Government, and
the expression of “President from Taiwan” was used instead of "Republic of China President". Concerning
this, Li Teng-hui, in answering reporter’s question said: "It is
dissatisfactory, but acceptable". In
addition, he sent a delegation with the incumbent Finance Minister as the
head of delegation to the annual general meeting of the Asian Development
Banks which opened in Beijing in May of the same year. At
the opening ceremony, the head of delegation stood up and showed respect
to the playing of Chinese national anthem. "The
President from Taiwan" was based on “Practical Diplomacy” that
does not stickle with the name of the country, and “Respect Chinese
National Antham” was based on “Not to conflict with China”, both
political beliefs could be seen as startup signs of Li Teng-hui diplomacy
and efforts toward improving relationship with China.
In June 1990, under the
auspices of the President’s Office, a “National Affairs Conference”
was held to discuss the state affairs.
In October, a nonpartisan “National Unification Committee” was
set up as the President’s advisory agency.
This was considering the Conservative Faction in the party and the
Chinese Government who were cautious that Lee Teng-hui’s democratization
may connect to “Taiwanization”, Taiwan independence, or independence
of the Kuomintang regime. Democratic
Progressive Party was opposed to this Committee because it did not only
profess “Unification”, but also conflicts with “Self-determination
of Taiwanese residents” that DPP asserted, and countered with a
resolution at the 4th Annual Convention in October asserting
that “the Reigns of Taiwan do not extend to China and Mongolia”.
Moreover, the Supreme Judge Council (Agency for interpreting the
Constitution) passed an “interpretation” in the same month that “the
first term of the Congress (including National Assembly, Legislative Yuan,
Control Yuan) was to be terminated by the end of 1991”.
This interpretation was a reflection of the policy of
Kuomintang’s Reformist Faction, and the premonition of the end of
“Perpetual Representatives” means allover reelection of the Congress,
an advance step to democratization. However,
in November of the following year, when Huang Hua, an officer of World
United Formosans for Independence, who “asserted Taiwan independence”,
was arrested on suspicion of “rebellion”, the promotion of
democratization became doubtful.
In December 1992, the
election of 161 second term Legislators, a general election first time in
Taiwan history, was held. After
a fierce battle, Democratic Progressive Party won 52 seats, declared
victory and celebrated with champagne.
Kuomintang remained with 103 seats and admitted “defeat”.
Needless to say that the “victory” and “defeat” did not
reflect on change of power, but was merely an analytic judgement on a
match between “elephant” (Kuomintang with 2,500,000 party members) and
“ant” (DPP with 40,000 party members).
In any case, with this general election in Taiwan, the “foreign
regime” Kuomintang acquired justification of ruling Taiwan for the first
time, which has a very significant meaning. Although the
democratization in Taiwan was advancing in rapid pace, it was still only
halfway. Moreover, the result
so far was not achieved entirely by Lee Teng-hui’s
political belief. It was won
with blood and tear by many courageous Taiwanese since
“February 28 incident”, through their sacrifices
and deaths, and under repression and oppression by
the Kuomintang regime. Needless to add, beside the supports from various countries,
especially the citizens of the Unites States and Japan, we must not
overlook the roles played by the American Congress and Government. Since the second term
Legislators were inaugurated in February 1993, one party dictatorship by
Kuomintang has already vanished. Li
Teng-hui, the Kuomintang chairman, in comply with the request of
“Democracy within the Party” from the Conservative Factions, announced
that in the coming 14th Party Representatives Convention in
August, the Party Chairman, and all Central Committee Members will be
publicly elected by the party representatives. Thus, Kuomintang will be
changed over from a “Revolutional Party” to a “Democratic Party”.
In addition, in answering to the question by the Legislators,
Cabinet Minister Lien Chan promised that party influences will be
withdrawn from all public organizations, such as military, administration
offices and public industries. However,
the position of Kuomintang as “the only and the largest party”,
established under “Party Ban” over a long period of time, still
remained. This reality is the
largest bottleneck of Taiwan’s democratization in the future.
Kuomintang, which had
been called the "Taiwan Zaibatsu", possessed an enormous number
of privileged "Party-managed Enterprises”.
Only those known at present, there are 9 listed companies, 35
unlisted companies with open stocks, and 40 companies with stocks unopen,
with a total assets of 400 to 500 billion Taiwan Yuans.
The “Party-managed Enterprises” which are cotrolled by the
Party Central’s Finanancial Committee, penetrate deeply into every
commercial fields, and are uneasy to dissolve.
The existance of these “Party-managed Enterprises”
is the obstacle of fair competition between political parties in politics.
On the other hand, the Opposition, DPP’s finance was hard up and
its asset was near zero. The existence of
“Grand Old Men of the Party” is another problem.
Like the Communist Party, Kuomintang also value the “seniority in
the Party”, in other words, one’s party history.
Kuomintang’s senior party members, who are still alive and are
called “Grand Old Men of the Party”, are almost all Mainlanders. They are the heart of Conservative Factions, who enjoy
various privileges. If the
“Democracy within the Party”, which the Conservative Factions
confronted with Lee Teng-hui in order to shake him up, was realized, the
vested interests of these “Grand Old Men” will be lost instantly.
The largest difficulty Lee Teng-hui would face in Party Reform was
how to treat these “Grand Old Men” who belonged to the Conservative
Factions. Yet, the
Conservative Factions had largest influences in resisting political
democratization, including “Democracy within the Party”.
Therefore, the “Democracy within the Party” and a thorough
democratization may cause a split in the Party, and was a heavy fetter to
Lee Teng-hui’s democratization. |