|
© J. Glenn Friesen 2003, 2004 |
Linked
Glossary of Terms
For Baader, wonder is linked to admiration (Werke I, 27); St. Martin wrote a treatise on admiration; it is a primitive law of our being. Wonder is the need for our soul to go out of time (Zeit 28). The spirit of man proceeds or moves out of wonder. That is why it does not rest until that which is worthy of wonder has been penetrated [durchgedrungen] (Philosophische Schriften I, 83). Wonder is distinguished from blind and stupid 'Angassen" (Philosophische Schriften I, 107; Werke I, 51, s.4). I believe that a mere 'Angassen' is our state in naive experience, before it is deepened. Our wonder and love can be directed either upwards towards God or downwards to temporal reality. But even when it is directed downwards, we see the immanence of God, and the supratemporal principles within time. And the completion of theory demands a return to the supratemporal self. In both cases, there is, at least in the final result, a going out of time. And wonder is the need of our soul to go out of time (Zeit 28). The Spirit of humans is restless, and proceeds, goes out of itself only by wonder (Begründung 10). Admiration comes from love; astonishment is not true knowledge; represents not love but fear. (Werke I, 54 s.19; Susini 60 ) this is perhabitation without inhabitation (external knowledge) astonishment is servility. admiration is adoration (Fermenta VIII, 23 note). Baader says that wonder is a free giving of oneself ('devouement'); the animal cannot wonder, being unfree. And the devil will not wonder. (Elementarbegriffe 536). Animals cannot believe nor admire (Werke IV, 27-28) I also believe that we can relate Baader's view of wonder to Dooyeweerd's idea that there is an inherent tendency towards the Origin. I believe that it is also related to Dooyeweerd's references to movement form our enstasis into the temporal. It is interesting to compare this idea of wonder to that of 'awe' in the Katha Upanishad 6
Revised Dec 27/04 |
|||||