THE PHARISEE IN US – Part 1

“But beware of the leaven of the Pharisees…”

Matthew 16:11 (NAS)

Return to Articles

 

      "Pharisee" means "separated ones." Of the three sects that made up the Jewish religious realm, the Essenes, Sadducees, and Pharisees, the Pharisees were the most strongly rebuked by our Lord Jesus for their actions and especially their attitudes.

 

      The Pharisees believed that some things were the work of fate. Other human events were thought by them to be under the control of the individual. The Essenes believed that fate ruled all things, and that nothing happens to man except by the decree of fate. The Sadducees removed fate as an influence of the human condition altogether. They believed that all things were under the control of man.

 

      As a group, or association, the Pharisees separated themselves from every kind of Levitical impurity and were united together as a force to preserve the Mosaic law in all its purity. The two essential conditions enacted upon potential members of this sect were these: firstly, man should observe all the sacred tithes (in relation to the production of the land), and refrain from eating anything which had not been tithed (or anything in which tithing might be called into question); secondly, man should observe the laws of purity, which so materially affected the eating of food and of all family matters.

 

      We will discuss nine manifestations of Pharisaism:

1.      The Pharisees considered themselves to be the guardians of the divine law and of their ancestral customs.

2.      They physically separated themselves from people of question- able character and integrity.

3.      They prided themselves in denouncing impurity or ungodliness.

4.      They were so determined not to break the law that they set up fences of rules for themselves and others that would guarantee, if obeyed, a safe distance from the transgression of God's laws.

5.      These pharisaical rules became so entrenched in their everyday living that they became indistinguishable from scriptural commandments.

6.      The Pharisees, as a power bloc, were very influential. When Jesus confronted them during his first advent, they were second in power only to the Roman governor.

7.      They were rigid and unyielding.

8.      They took pride in being recognized as Pharisees by other men.

9.      In their piety they looked down upon others whom they viewed as being inferior to themselves.

 

      In fairness to the Pharisees it must be  noted  that  they  were  not lukewarm, nor indifferent to God's Word. They did, in fact, care a lot and gave it their all. However, their zeal became so unbalanced that it affected their judgment, for it excluded the spirit of the law and thus it resulted in spiritual destruction rather than self-preservation.

 

      Many other items could be listed. Some can be found in the twenty-third chapter of Matthew, in which Jesus pronounces a series of "woes" upon the Pharisees based upon their erroneous traditions. For the sake of our discussion, we will limit ourselves to these nine.

 

Could These Attitudes Affect Us?

 

      The Pharisees were concerned for God's Word and Law as well as for righteous living. If such things happened to them, could they not also happen to us who share these same concerns?

 

      Then some of the Pharisees and scribes came to Jesus from Jerusalem, saying, "Why do your disciples transgress the tradition of the elders? For they do not wash their hands when they eat bread." And He answered and said to them, "And why do you yourselves transgress the commandment of God for the sake of your tradition?" (Matt. 15:1-3, NAS)

 

      Could Jesus be asking we who are living today the same question? Let’s look at these nine points in connection with this possibility.

 

 

 

Divine Guardians

 

      The Pharisees considered themselves to be guardians of divine truth: the Word, its Law, and the Jewish traditions. They assumed this responsibility, thinking that only they were qualified to perform this duty. Thus, they set themselves in the position of controlling other men's customs as well as the correct interpretation of the Law. They came to believe that their traditions and superior wisdom were essential to the guidance of God's people and that God was dealing only with their group; therefore, it was their duty to keep their neighbor straight in what was truly God’s Word and practice. Yet, their words and actions betrayed their attitudes.

 

      While preparing this article an event occurred, which seemed providential. I received a letter containing 191 points, which were presented as scriptural truths. I was asked to reply to each point on that list, stating whether I subscribed to it.  We quote from that letter:

 

      “We are planning to prepare a directory which will include every prospective speaker to whom this letter is mailed. Along with his name, it will show whether he believes all the items, or if he rejects some, the items that he rejects will be listed. If he does not respond, he will be designated ‘non-responder.’ Please help us complete the directory by informing us in which of the above categories you wish to

 be placed. This directory will be made available to all the brethren so that they can know how every prospective speaker stands on every point of ‘present truth.’

 

      We have been unable to find scriptural precedent for this type of request. The writer of this letter was clearly assuming the responsibility of screening and publishing whether others believed as they did on one hundred ninety-one points of truth.

 

      Some of us use the term "nominal church" in both our dialogue and discourse. The word "nominal" means "in name only." While it may be true that this term applies to many who name the name of Christ, the way in which the phrase is uttered is often very judgmental and objectionable. In many cases, this expression is used to indicate one's superiority over others who they deem “believers in name only." It is proper to appreciate truths we have, and to express that appreciation openly, but let us be sure that our motivation for expressing it is not tinged with pride and judgmental attitude of others.

 

      If we are proud that God has specially given us some measure of His truth that others do not see, are we any better than the Pharisees? If we think that we alone have exclusive rights to divine truth or if we believe that only we have the Holy Spirit, because of what we believe and others do not, are we not in danger of looking down on others as did the Pharisees? If we are so positive that God could not be dealing with anyone outside of our circle of truth, specially among those we term "nominal Christians," are we in danger of Pharisaism? Or if we seek to limit God (by our interpretations and traditional convictions), are we any better than the Pharisees of Jesus’ day?

 

      We should appreciate our understanding of God's Word and of His wonderful, inclusive plan of the ages, but let us do so in true humility.  When we share these precious truths, which have so enriched our lives, let it be in the spirit of meekness. Let us not erect barriers or go up by steps to the altar of our God. If we do, we will not be following in the footsteps of our Master and Leader, the Lord Jesus Christ, who described Himself as “meek and lowly of heart.” The Pharisees’ improper attitudes led them to erect a staircase to God’s altar, elevating themselves where they could only look down upon others whom they had risen above. They had forgotten the Word of the Lord, "And you shall not go up by steps unto my altar, that your nakedness [the sin of pride] may not be exposed on it" (Ex. 20:26, NAS). In their misguided zeal, they repeatedly transgressed this commandment.                       

 

      “For we dare not make ourselves of the number, or compare ourselves with some that commend themselves; but they measuring themselves by themselves, and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise!”                                                                     

                                                                                                                                                                     2 Cor. 10:12

    

 

THE PHARISEE IN US – Part 2

 

Physical Separation

 

      The Pharisees were very careful with whom they associated. According to Mc-Clintock and Strong, the name Pharisee was first used by the Sadducees in the Mishna. By their use of this word towards this sect, they were not being complimentary. The term may well have described their separated lives. At first they were separated ones for the purpose of ridding themselves of any Levitical impurity. But they erred when they began to view themselves as being holier and as being on a higher level than others.

 

      Can this happen to the child of God today? Can we view others in the same way as the Pharisees viewed their contemporaries? Do we view those outside our fellowship as unworthy of our time, attention or love? Some of the Pharisees used their separation as a visible sign to others that they alone were the special ones in God's sight. They believed this fact was self-evident. Further, they came to believe that their example of separation and their appearance of holiness were of utmost importance to the guidance of God's people. They felt that somehow this display of holiness would have a preserving influence upon the conduct of others and it raised their sense of self-worth. They became important in their own eyes. The more they practiced this, the more they enjoyed the feeling. This power became addictive, a need to feel special, a need for personal recognition of one's own holiness and piety.

 

      How subtle is the love of recognition. It clouds the mind and heart with feelings of pride and self-interest. "Woe to you, Pharisees! For you love the front seats in the synagogues, and the respectful greet- ings in the market places" (Luke 11:43, NAS). Is it possible that that could be said of us? Could this happen to an elder or Pastor of the Lord’s people? Ask yourself, how strong is my desire to be recognized and appreciated or to be accepted in the prominent ranks of brethren, or of speakers? Is it important that my work receive recognition from others? Do we enjoy being looked up to as being fine examples of those who are faithfully walking the narrow way? Is it necessary that others should be aware of our soundness in doctrine or wisdom or that they should seek our counsel? Do we feel that for a work to be done properly we must do it ourselves? Do we think our presence so important in our fellowship that if we are absent the group and study will not function as well?

 

      The real issue in all of these questions is plain: What is my own motivation? Let it not be any of the things just mentioned but only that we want to please and glorify our Heavenly Father and Lord Jesus Christ by doing God’s will humbly and with all our might - as we serve Him, and His brethren. Let us remember the wise axiom, “There is no end to the good we can do, if we do not care who gets the credit" and always remember if there is any credit due, it should go to God and our Lord Jesus Christ.  If we boast, may it alone be in the Lord!

 

Proud Denunciations

 

      Many Pharisees took pride in opposing and denouncing impurity and ungodliness in the actions of others. They thought of themselves as a sort of spiritual police force to the Jews. In one instance we read of a woman entering the house of a Pharisee (Luke 7:36-50) and of his judgmental attitude towards her. This woman had washed Jesus' feet with her tears and dried them with her hair. She had anointed him with expensive ointment and had kissed his feet repeatedly. In the 37th vs. we learn that she was a sinner, publicly known as a woman of the streets. The Pharisee was embarrassed, and assessing the situation (vs. 39) he said to himself, "If this man (Jesus] were a prophet He would know who and what sort of person this woman is who is touching Him, that she is a sinner." The Pharisee would have quickly thrown her back on the street, and would have felt dirty and ritually contaminated had he been touched by her. He had already judged her; she counted as nothing more than garbage; she was beyond help. His abhorrence of outward sin had removed all  compassion, and left him woefully unbalanced. His harsh judgment  blinded him to any good that this woman might do and kept him from seeing that she had come in contrition and repentance. He saw only the filth of her reputation and looking down upon her, revealing his own pride and self-righteousness.

 

      How differently Jesus treated this woman. He recognized her repentant heart and the love her actions manifested. He perceived her desire for forgiveness and encouragement. Compassion moved within him as he watched the display of her faith and love.

 

      "I say to you, her sins, which are many, have been forgiven, for she loved much; but he who is forgiven little, loves little," and He said to her, ‘your sins have been forgiven’" (vs. 47, 48, NAS). 

 

      Which style of judgment do you follow, Jesus' or the Pharisee's? The Pharisee would have expelled her, would have scorned her, and she would have been left to continue in her sinful ways. But because of the love and compassion of Jesus, we may logically conclude that the woman never reverted back to her path of sin. Jesus could separate the sinner from the sin, an ability that most of us find difficult.  Jesus hated the sin but could still love the sinner. What a worthwhile trait to emulate in our lives!

 

Fence Makers

 

      The Pharisees were compelled to keep the law. They felt it was necessary to take further steps to insure that the law was not broken. So they set up fences which were designed to keep them at a safe distance from any point in which they might break the law. These barriers, or fences, which were incorporated into the traditions of the elders, soon became as important as the law itself.

 

       We, too, may set up rules, fences, and barriers that we feel will keep us on safe ground in keeping the Lord's commandments. Do we regard some of our traditions with as much authority as Scripture? Is it possible that we have set up fences of conduct for ourselves by which we also judge the conduct of others?

 

      This is an important consideration, for it is one thing to establish restrictions or standards for ourselves, but it is quite another to expect others to live up to the same and if they do not, to judge them as not living up to the principles of Scripture. Hardly anyone would dare admit such an attitude, but do our thoughts or actions sometimes reach this very judgment?

 

      Another tradition of the Pharisees was to establish loopholes that would work to their own benefit. Jesus reproved them sharply for this (Matt. 15) in connection with their responsibility to their aging parents. By declaring their own possessions as reserved for the Lord they relieved themselves of their responsibility of caring for their parents. Jesus calls this practice a commandment of man (vs. 9). Later on the Apostle Paul would preach contrary to this accepted practice. "But if any one does not provide for his own, and especially for those of his household, he has denied the faith, and is worse than an unbeliever" (1 Tim. 5:8, NAS). There is no doubt as to the intent of this verse. But could there be a wider interpretation also? In his letter to the Hebrew Christians he says that Christ was faithful over his own household, and  He adds that we are that house. (cf. Heb. 3:6). In Galatians we are admonished to do good to all men and especially to do good to those of the household of faith (6:1 0).

 

      These verses clearly place a responsibility upon any who claim to be of his household. If we ignore the needs of any, whether they be parents, dependent children, or other members of the body of Christ, or anyone the Lord puts in our pathway, we are in danger of breaking God's Word. Let us not rationalize this matter away. It is not acceptable to say that we were going to use this substance, time, money, land, for the Lord in some areas that we think more important. If we are inclined to do so, are we any better than the Pharisee? "He who shuts his ear to the cry of the poor will also cry himself and not be answered" (Prov. 21:13, NAS).  Conversely, we read, "He who gives to the poor will never want, but he who shuts his eyes will have many curses" (28:28, NAS).

 

      The principle, which Jesus described in the Parable of the Sheep and Goats (Matt. 25:31-46), applies to us today as well as to all of mankind in the Millennial Kingdom of our Lord. Let us not be among those described in His sharp words: "For I was hungry, and you gave me nothing to eat; I was thirsty, and you gave me nothing to drink; I was a stranger, and you did not invite me in; naked and you did not clothe me; sick and in prison, and you did not visit me." Then they themselves also will answer, saying, "Lord, when did we see you hungry, or thirsty, or a stranger, or naked, or sick, or in prison, and did not take care of you?" Then he will answer them, saying, "Truly I say to you, to the extent that you did not do it to one of the least of these, you did not do it to me" (Matt. 25:42-45, NAS).

 

      Responsibility towards others is an important part of the Christian's walk. The parable shows that we are required to be careful both of the physical and spiritual needs of those around us. Let us look often at the examples of Jesus so that our judgment will be balanced and that we will resist all attempts at improper rationalization. We have received freely from the bounty of the Lord. Should we not be as free to give to others? Let us give and share with joy, as though we were giving or sharing with the Lord Himself.

(To be continued)

                                   

THE PHARISEE IN US – Part 3

 

Rules that Stifle the Spirit

 

      One side effect of pharisaical rule making was, it quenched the teaching of the Scriptures, especially the spirit of truth. Traditions sometimes became equal, or greater than Scripture in their ritualistic lives. Is it possible that such could happen to modem day students of the Bible?

 

      Tradition is: the way that we have always done things. It can become so important that we make tradition a principle, and defend it so tenaciously that we behave improperly in its defense. Some traditions may be proper, but they may also take on so much added meaning in our own mind that they become the basis of contention and discord. We can get ourselves in trouble when we insist on imposing our traditions on others who perhaps learned different ones.

 

      The Pharisees provided an interesting case in point in Mark 7:5: "...'Why do your disciples not walk according to the tradition of the elders, but eat their bread with unclean hands"' (vs. 5)? By way of comparison, we’ll use a current day illustration, with no intent here to judge the motives, nor even suggest that any withdraw from these traditions. This comparison is to demonstrate that in such matters, there is no scriptural principle to be followed and that we must exercise great caution in our attitude towards others who do things differently than we do.

 

      People, in general, do not like change. The Pharisees were no exception. Change seems to threaten the security in the status-quo. Most churches have been confronted with changes. Some are good and some are not. But to some in the church no change is good. Take for instance, music in the church. There are many who are strongly opposed to contemporary Christian music and are of the opinion that only the piano or an organ should be used in a church for its music. There are church splits because strong opinioned factions exist among its members. For instance, when a “praise band” with a drummer has been introduced into the worship service on Sunday in what always has been a conservative church; to some of its members it is irreverent and even primitive. A mind-set so strong has been formed and they will use their influence to convince others of their viewpoint. Strife will usually result in case like this to the detriment of health of the church and its members. A pharisaical attitude can very quickly and subtlety take over one’s thinking. May we be aware of this possibility in our Christian walk.

 

      How careful we ought to be that we do not substitute our thinking for what Scripture clearly teaches or does not teach. If we do, we may be denying others the privilege of service where God has given some gift for the edifying of the church.

 

      There are other areas where traditions have crept in. Let us prayerfully consider what these might be and use caution that we keep them in their proper sphere, always making the authority of Scripture more important by far than the traditions we have learned.

 

Spiritual Power Brokers

 

      The Pharisees were among the early special-interest groups. They were ready to use all that they had to acquire what they thought was right and necessary. Can this attitude be at work among the church today? Could certain ones who share an opinion be exerting combined influence among brethren so as to give rise to a spirit of sectarianism? Might some insist that all who do not agree with their interpretation of Scripture are not clear in the truth? Should elders effectively caution others to disassociate with others whose views are different from their own? 

 

      Brethren, is Christ divided? The apostle asked this question in astonishment, 2,000 years ago! How careful we need to be that we learn to maintain the Spirit of Jesus and our beloved brother Paul. Sectarianism arose and was warned against in the early church. It was, evidently, felt between Jewish and Gentile Christians.

      “But when Peter came to Antioch, I opposed him to his face, because he stood condemned. For before certain men came from James, he ate with the Gentiles; but when they came he drew back and separated himself, fearing the circumcision party. And with him the rest of the Jews acted insincerely so that even Barnabas was carried away by their insincerity” (Gal. 2:11-13, RSV).

 

      Has it ever happened that we have not wanted it known that we associate with other brethren? Do we fear what some would say or think? This fear creeps in subtly, just as it did with Peter. Let us be on guard that we have the proper spirit and recognize the oneness of the body of Christ. Let us keep the spirit of sectarianism and human thinking far from us and not even look at another with the disdain which so often accompanies a sectarian spirit.

           

Self-Assured Protectors of the Word

 

      The reason that the Pharisees were so sure that they were right about things is because of their self-assumed position as protectors of God's Word. They were rigid, unyielding, and intractable. They let pride replace meekness and humility. Hence, they were unable to accept Jesus' message. Their rigid attitude (Paul calls them stiff-necked) polluted and hardened their hearts. This was the very accusation that Stephen made against them, saying, "You stiff-necked people, uncircumcised in heart and ears, you always resist the Holy Spirit. As your fathers did, so do you" (Acts 7:51, 52). Their pride closed their ears to his warning; and though Stephen accurately judged their character, in their self-righteous anger and hatred they stoned him to death,  feeling justified in their actions.  How  deeply  the  leaven  had penetrated their hearts.  Brethren, let us be as humble and teachable as possible, and especially so when the word of truth condemns us. A meek and contrite heart will refrain from over-reacting and cause us to kneel in repentance at the foot of the Cross. May we pray that our minds not become rigid that we can no longer be taught or changed by God, for change is a must if we are to be conformed to Jesus' image.

 

      We write these things to encourage all to a condition of awareness of our need to stay close to the Lord and His Word.  Jesus’ words to the Pharisees are for us also. Dear Lord, help us to purge out all leaven that we may stand before You, pure and unspotted ‘In The Beloved!’                                               

  

THE PHARISEE IN US – Part 4

 

Pleasing Recognition

 

      What a telling symptom was the pleasure the Pharisees derived in being recognized and looked up to as “Holy.” This is a subtle and ever present danger, especially to elders or any in positions of prominence. Jesus' example was so vastly different from that set by His detractors. In His victories He pointed to God. In His actions He gave praise to the Almighty. Honor and glory always ascended to His Heavenly Father for anything Jesus did. But the Pharisees had an appetite for praise, and it filled their hearts with overflowing pride.

 

      "For who regards you as superior? And what do you have that you did not receive? But if you did receive it, why do you boast as if you had not received it?" (1 Cor. 4:7, NAS). Is this not the proper at- titude for a follower of the Lord Jesus Christ? Obviously, it is the attitude of those who had been with Jesus. Let the praise and glory be directed upward, always toward our loving heavenly Father.

 

      The Pharisees considered themselves as special. They loved the best seats in the synagogue. In comparing themselves to others, they placed themselves on a pedestal, leaving all others on a lower level.

 

      And so Jesus told this parable to certain ones who trusted in themselves that they were righteous, and viewed others with contempt: "Two men went up into the temple to pray, one a Pharisee, and the other a tax-gatherer. The Pharisee stood and was praying thus to himself, 'God, I thank thee that I am not like other people: swindlers, unjust, adulterers, or even like this tax-gatherer. I fast twice a week; I pay tithes of all that I get…'”

 

      This Pharisee had forgotten the lesson of not building steps to the altar of God (Ex. 20:26), or had he never learned it? He was naked before God, proud and aloof before men; all this was clear to see from the words of his prayer. But could it be that we too take on a similar position towards others outside our circle of truth? Do we look down on those of other Christian persuasion, feeling we live a life so much more sacrificial than they? Do we, in attitude or thought, put ourselves on an altar of “hewn stone” of our own making? Do we feel we have a more superior understanding of the Scriptures because we have spent years studying the Word? Let us beware of “the leaven of the Pharisees.” Let us be watchful lest we raise up an altar to Self in our hearts and lives.

 

      We do not mean to discourage any, but rather desire to encourage all to a condition of awareness of our need to stay close to the Word of God, both Living and Written. All Scripture is given to us for instruction. Jesus intended for us to learn by the reproofs that He spoke to the Pharisees. They were lessons, warnings to us, just as to them, that we should be careful lest we fall into the same pit as they did. If we know that “the heart is deceitful above all things” and this is a possibility, we will be alert and ask the Lord to search our heart and thoughts so that we may “purge out the old leaven” and being cleansed in the blood of our Lord Jesus, may then stand pure and unspotted before God.

 

Some Thoughts on Tradition

 

·         Many traditions, rules and codes of living can be obeyed by human effort, but the bearing of the fruit of the Spirit has to come from God through the power and influence of His Holy Spirit.

 

·         Walking within the fences of traditions is playing it safe, but leaves little room for walking by faith. Being without boundaries is unsettling to many who fear the unknown.

 

·         Sheep may be contained by fences, but they prosper best outside in a trusting relationship with their shepherd.

 

·         Tearing down the fences makes “religious” people profoundly angry.

 

·         As Jesus did with the Pharisees, He no doubt would do today…namely, use “wire cutters” to cut away all humanly devised fences.

 

·         We must realize that at times a disciple of Christ must trespass beyond human fences, risking possible misunderstanding, to be loyal to Jesus.

 

·         Scripture, not tradition, is the final test of truth.

 

·         Usually human fences can be obeyed if one works at it.

 

·         When human fences do work, they superficially counterfeit the work, influence and power of the Holy Spirit. We must be courageous enough to consider God’s Word for ourselves with an open mind.

 

·         True spiritual maturity comes when one realizes that fences are most often obstructions to spiritual growth, and that it is only the supernatural help of the Holy Spirit in our lives that will keep us on safe ground.

 

·         Fences do work; they often do help people live a religious life to the detriment of true spirituality which alone can change the inner man.

 

·         Fences can easily become cosmetic substitutes for true righteousness. Godliness emanates from within and manifests itself outwardly and always to the praise and glory of God.

 

·         We must be careful lest we, like the Pharisees of old, convert people to a “religion” or denomination and belief system, rather than to Christ!

 

·         We do not help the eternal cause of Christ by bringing about the conversion of someone from the world into the culture and confines of legalism.

                                        

                              “When your loyalties conflict, always obey Jesus Christ whatever the cost.”

                                                                                                                                             O. Chambers

 

 

Some Added Thoughts on Traditions

 

·         Humanly devised traditions often focus on external actions while God focuses on the attitudes of the heart that motivate the actions.

 

·         Living God’s truth requires a relationship with Him.

 

·         It is impossible to clean up the inside without divine help. In fact, God must do it for us…we need just to be willing.

 

·         Tradition exerts an enormous pull on our emotions because it provides sameness, security, stability, and it feels right.

 

·         The Pharisees of Jesus’ day were proud of their traditions for they believed they were given to them by God Himself.

 

·         The Pharisees, and even some in today’s churches, measure righteousness by loyalty and obedience to “sacred” tradition.

 

·         If you doubt the power of traditions, try to change something in your church from the way that it has been done in the past.

 

·         Traditions often set up safety fences and post “no trespassing” signs.

 

·         Freedom always has the potential for abuse, but it also provides the opportunity for true convictions and character to develop.

 

Paul tells us of those who, “measuring themselves and comparing themselves among themselves, are not wise” (2 Corinthians 10:12).

 

Return to Articles