The Faithful and Discreet Slave

-          by  Lewis Zenovay Hrytzak

 

Return to Articles

 

[Note: The Scriptural consideration of this topic is specifically intended for those who, because of conscience, are no longer able to function within the Watchtower Bible and Tract Society--the governing organization of Jehovah’s Witnesses. It is for their benefit that The New World Translation of the Holy Scriptures is used throughout.]

 

 

The founder of the Watch Tower movement was a mild-mannered, kind and studious servant of God whose name was Charles Taze Russell. As a young man, his faith in God began to dwindle, but it was rekindled by a Second Advent Preacher, Jonas Wendel, who spoke at a dingy hall in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania one Saturday evening in 1868. That was an important turning point in young Russell’s life. He began to study the Bible in earnest, for he wanted to see if it offered something better than what organized religion did. Soon he was joined by other sincere Bible students.

 

In 1876, Russell read Nelson Barbour’s magazine, Herald of the Morning, and was keen on learning more about Christ’s return (in 1874), but wanted to know the evidence for it. So he arranged for Barbour to come and see him. Thereafter, Russell was convinced that Jesus had indeed returned in 1874 and was invisibly present. Russell wrote an article, stating that the Gentiles Times would end in 1914 [See note 1] and submitted it to George Storrs who published it in his magazine, “The Bible Examiner, in 1876.

 

Russell came to believe that a “harvest period” began in 1874 and would last for 40 years, then culminate in 1914. That year was to see the end of the Gentile Times, the removal of the kingdoms of the world, and the setting up of the ‘earthly aspect’ of God’s Kingdom.  Then the faithful would be taken to heaven.  Of course, that is not what happened.

 

A few years later, Barbour and Russell parted company and Russell began to publish Zion’s Watchtower. [See note 2] In his first issue, (July 1879) Russell reaffirmed the year 1874 as the invisible return of Jesus. Like Barbour, he was convinced that Jesus was invisibly present and held to that conviction right until his death, (in 1916). Throughout his life, he was a devoted student of Scripture, a prolific writer and a gifted orator, lecturing on Bible topics both at home and abroad. As one might well imagine, Russell was admired, respected and praised. When Bible questions were asked, the answers he gave were generally prefaced with statements such as, “to us it would seem,” “it would appear,” “it would seem reasonable” and so forth. He seemed careful not to be dogmatic in his responses.

 

At first, he appeared most intent to avoid any appearance of being a special oracle for God. However, lavish praise is not good for anyone, and Pastor Russell was no exception. While working at Bethel in the mid-fifties, an older member of the “anointed” told me that when people would ask Russell if he was “the faithful and wise servant” (of whom Jesus had spoken) he would simply reply, “Some say it’s me, and others say it’s Zion’s Watchtower.” He would say no more, allowing his listeners to arrive at their own conclusion; nor did he object to their suggestion that he was that slave. This is corroborated by the following statement that appeared in the Watchtower (12/1/1919, page 357), which states: “Thousands of the readers of Pastor Russell’s writings believe that he filled the office of “that faithful and wise servant,” and that his great work was giving to the Household of Faith meat in due season. His modesty and humility precluded him from openly claiming this title, but he admitted as much in private conversation.”

 

In 1909, he wrote a few articles in Zion’s Watchtower, expressing the view that the new covenant foretold in Jeremiah 31:31-33 does not apply to the Church, but to natural Israel.  This was a direct reversal of what he had previously believed and written. Consequently, a serious schism resulted, and many left the movement at that time. [See note 3]

 

Toward the end of his life, Russell wanted his very much younger associate, A. H. McMillan, to succeed him as the next president, for they were both quite similar in personality. McMillan, (who wrote “Faith on the March”), shared this story with a few of us who were working in Bethel then. (He was in his late eighties at the time). He said that he felt it was too great a task for him and told Russell so. At any rate, due to failed expectations in 1914, and because of a “take-over” [See note 4] of the Watch Tower Society by its next president, Judge Rutherford, (after Russell’s death), many other adherents of that era decided to abandon the movement as well. However, for those who stayed, the concept that the Watch Tower Society was directed by “The faithful and discreet slave” lived on under the direction of its new president, Judge Rutherford. 

 

Under his presidency, there was an important change that came about in 1927, when The Watchtower published an article stating that “The faithful and wise servant” was no longer believed to be a single individual (Charles Taze Russell) but rather, a faithful  “remnant,” (a group of consecrated individuals). This is a principal doctrine of Jehovah’s Witnesses until this day. Indeed, their organizational structure is actually based on this belief.

 

However, those who left the Watch Tower Society (after Russell’s death) continued to believe that its founder, Charles Taze Russell, really was “the Faithful and Wise Servant,” and that any who took that designation upon themselves are actually usurping it. The Bible Students, their successors, still believe that. They also think Judge Rutherford took the Watch Tower Society off course, and that they are the ones that remain true to the organization started by Russell.

 

In view of this, we must ask the two following questions: First, what do the Scriptures actually teach as to the identity of the faithful and discreet slave?   And second, when will this faithful and discreet servant be appointed over all of the Lord’s domestics, (or household)?

 

 

The Faithful and Discreet Slave

 

Jesus did not say who the slave is.  Rather, he asked a rhetorical question, namely, “Who really is the faithful and discreet slave whom his master has appointed [placed in charge] over his domestics to give them their food at the proper time?” Then he added: “Happy is that slave if his master on arriving finds him doing so. Truly I say to you, He will appoint him over all his belongings.” – Matthew 24:45-47. (Also read verses 48-51)

 

In Matthew 24:45, the word “appointed” translates the Greek verb kathisteemi which also means “place/d in charge” or “designate/d.”   [See note 5]   But how were they placed in charge?

 

Clarke’s Commentary makes an interesting observation on this text. It states: “All should live in expectation of the coming of Christ, which a servant has with respect to the return of his Master, who, in departing for a season, left the management of his affairs to him; and of which management he is to give an exact account on his Master’s return.” [ See Vol. 3, Greek Scriptures, Matt. 24:45]

 

The point being made by Clarke’s Commentary is that all of the master’s slaves are expected to take care of his affairs during his absence, for they must render an exact account when he returns. But what does the management of the master’s affairs involve?

 

 

Jesus Spoke of Four Slaves

 

In Matthew’s account (24:25-51) only two slaves are mentioned, “the faithful and discreet slave” and “the evil slave.” However, according to Luke’s account, Jesus spoke of four slaves. At Luke 12:42-48 we read the following: ‘And the Lord said: “Who really is the faithful steward, the discreet one, whom his master will appoint over his body of attendants to keep giving them their measure of food supplies at the proper time? Happy is that slave, if his master on arriving finds him doing so! I tell you truthfully, He will appoint him over all his belongings. But if ever that slave should say in his heart, ‘My master delays coming, and should start to beat the menservants and the maidservants, and to eat and drink and get drunk, the master of that slave will come on a day that he is not expecting [him] and in an hour that he does not know, and he will punish him with the greatest severity and assign him a part with the unfaithful ones. Then the slave that understood the will of his master, but did not get ready or do in line with his will, will be beaten with many strokes. But the one that did not understand, and so did things deserving of strokes will be beaten with few.” [See note 6] 

 

In Luke’s account Jesus is speaking of four kinds of persons (slaves). Each believer is like one of the four. If we are “faithful and discreet”, we will follow Jesus steps closely, even as the Scriptures admonish us to do. Moreover, we will do the work he has given his followers to perform. We will be busily engaged in feeding his domestics, thereby sharing in the ‘construction’ of “God’s house” (in this age). [This is explained in more detail on the following pages.] The slave that does this will be among those appointed “over all of (the master’s) belongings.”

 

On the other hand, the “evil slave” ignores the work that Christ, the Master, has left for his followers to perform. Instead, he “beats his fellow slaves” (his fellow believers), maligning and imputing evil to them. For this, he will be punished “with the greatest severity, and assign(ed) a part with the unfaithful ones.”

 

The “slave that understood the will of his master but did not get ready to do in line with his will” describes the person who has learned many wonderful truths from God’s Word, but fails to live his life accordingly. Neither does he share such truths with others in order to help them come to Christ. Consequently, he will be “beaten with many strokes.”

 

The last slave mentioned by Jesus is “the one that did not understand and so did things deserving of strokes.” Here we have a description of an individual who ‘partakes of milk.’ While he has learned some truths, he is “unacquainted with the word of righteousness for he is a babe.” (Hebrews 5:13) This type of person does not understand God’s purpose (in depth).  Neither does he do it. Consequently, he “will be beaten with few [strokes].”  But is he exempt from performing the will of his master? Not at all! The requirement is the same for all of the mater’s slaves, but what is that requirement which, if performed faithfully and discreetly, will qualify the faithful to be appointed over all of his belongings?

 

After giving the above illustration (parable), Jesus said: “I came to start a fire on the earth, and what more is there for me to wish, if it has already been lighted?  (Luke 12:49)  Jesus “started a fire on the earth” by laying the foundation for that which was to follow, namely, the construction of God’s house, or temple. This time, however, it was being built with “living stones.” (1 Peter 2:5-9)

 

.

Placed In Charge Of  The Master’s  “Domestics”

 

In Strong’s Greek Dictionary, the word ‘domestics’ or ‘household,’ (used at Matt. 24:45 and Luke 12:42) is translated from the Greek noun therapeia.  It means “staff of servants, those entrusted to the care of the household.” Wigram Englishman’s Greek Concordance  translates the Greek noun therapeia as ‘household’ at Matt. 24:45, and at Luke 12:42. Word Study Greek-English New Testament with Complete Concordance by Paul R. McReynolds (based on USB 3rd edition) translates the Greek words ‘oiketeia,’ as ‘household’ at Matt. 24:45, and ‘therapeia’ as ‘household’ at Luke 12:42.  Arndt-Gingrich’s Lexicon (considered a standard authority in this field) shows the verb therapeuo as having several meanings: (1) to serve a Divinity as at Acts 17:25; and (2) to care for, wait upon, treat (medically), also heal, restore, cure. As a noun, therapeia can mean treatment of the sick, or healing. Of course, it also means care and service of the household.  [See note 7]

 

Because the Greek references quoted use therapeia in Luke’s and Matthew’s account [with the exception of  ‘Word Study’, that uses oiketeia in Matthew, but therapeia in Luke], and bearing in mind that both accounts relate to the same event, it appears quite likely that the use of a Greek word that depicts ‘household’ and ‘healing’ may be more than coincidental. The household of God undergo spiritual healing and are used by God to bring this healing to others.

“Domestics” is just another word for household, the household of God, but who are its members?  At Matthew 22:14, Jesus said: “For there are many invited (called), but few are chosen.” In Revelation 17:14, Jesus refers to these as “called, and chosen, and faithful.” Obviously, he was speaking of a process, for the call goes out to many, but few are chosen, and it remains for them to be found faithful. The reason why “few are chosen” is that “few” respond in faith.  An outstanding example of this is the nation of Israel in Jesus’ day. They were called, but did not respond, so God invited Gentiles. - Matt. 22:4-10; Acts 13:45,46;  (See: Jer. 7:12-15;  Prov. 1:23-25; Isa. 65:12-16; Heb. 2:1-3) Those who respond in faith are the chosen who are blessed. - 2 Thess. 1:3-9; 2:13,14.

 

How are people invited, or called, and how do they become part of God’s household?  At John 6:44, Jesus provides the short answer, saying: “No one can come to me unless the Father, who sent me, draws him.” Experience shows that the calling of each person is rather unique to that one, for God supplies whatever is necessary for him (or her) to be drawn to his Son. [See note 8]  Does such a calling constitute being born again?  What do the Scriptures state?

Speaking to Nicodemus, Jesus said: “Most truly I say to you, unless anyone is born again, he cannot see the kingdom of God.” Nicodemus was puzzled, so Jesus added: “Unless anyone is born from water and spirit, he cannot enter into the kingdom of God.” (John 3:3-5) In those words to Nicodemus, we have a simple explanation of how one is born again. It is by means of the Scriptures [water] and God’s holy spirit. It is as simple as that! And just as being “born from water” is ongoing, even so with being “born from spirit.” While it is true that our first realization of son-ship is a memorable event, we must continue to live under the shadow of God’s holy spirit, and “walk by spirit.” (Romans 8:4,5,9)

In Ephesians (5:26), Paul shows what it means to be “born from water.” He states: “that he [Christ] might sanctify it [the Church], cleansing it with the bath of water by means of the Word.” (The Scriptures serve as “a lamp to our foot and a light to our roadway” - Psa. 119:105).  Peter confirms this by stating: “For you have been given a new birththrough the word of the living and enduring God.” (1 Peter 1:23) And at Titus 3:5, this is reconfirmed. Paul wrote: “…he saved us through the bath that brought us to life and through the making of us new by holy spirit.” In the very next verse (6), Paul says: “This [spirit] he poured out richly upon us through Jesus Christ our Savior...” Why? Paul answers: “[that] we might become heirs according to a hope of everlasting life.” 

By his holy spirit, God teaches us and provides enlightenment, as stated at 1 John 2:27.  Indeed, his word cannot be understood without such divine help. For example, when there was discussion about the identity of Jesus, he asked his disciples: “… who do you say I am?” Peter replied: “You are the Christ, the Son of the living God.” Note Jesus’ reply: “…flesh and blood did not reveal it to you, but my Father, who is in the heavens, did.” –Matt. 16:14-16. Peter understood, not because of human wisdom, but because of God’s help by means of his holy spirit. That is essential in the process of being born again. But how does one know he has been chosen? 

Writing to the Roman’s (8:14-16), Paul explains what happens. He states: “For all who are led by God’s spirit, these are God’s sons, for you did not receive a spirit of slavery causing fear again, but you received a spirit of adoption as sons, by which spirit we cry out, “Abba, Father!” The spirit itself [God’s spirit] bears witness with our spirit [our inclination of mind and heart], that we are God’s children.” In that same letter, Paul contrasts walking in the flesh, with being led by God’s spirit. This may explain why some might feel the prompting of God’s spirit, but do not, immediately respond, by allowing to be led by God’s spirit. Perhaps later, (even years later) they may feel such promptings again, and respond at that time. This wonderful process of rebirth was foretold by the prophet Ezekiel, (Ezek. 36:25-28). The “land” represents God’s rest into which believers enter. (See: Heb. 3:10,11; 3:18,19; 4:1-8)

In summary, at Galatians (3:26), Paul states: “You are all in fact, Sons of God through your faith in Christ Jesus.” Faith in Christ Jesus brings us into a relationship with our heavenly Father. Then something truly wonderful happens to us. In the very next chapter, Paul tells us what it is, (4:6, 7):  “Now because you are sons, God has sent forth the spirit of his Son into our hearts and it cries out: “Abba, Father!” So then, you are no longer a slave but a son; and if a son, also an heir through God.” This process of rebirth is validated to us by means of God’s holy spirit. Suddenly, with the help of God’s Spirit, we realize the relationship we have with our Heavenly Father. We are his sons!

 

Prior to his ascension into heaven, Jesus said to his disciples: “You will receive power when the holy spirit arrives upon you, and you will be witnesses of me both in Jerusalem and in all Judea and Samaria and to the most distant part of the earth.” – Acts 1:8.  Of course, as “witnesses of Jesus,” his disciples would naturally be witnesses of his Father, Jehovah God, for it was from his Father that Jesus received “all authority, in heaven and on earth.” (Matt. 28:18) What is more, it is as one in authority that Jesus gave his followers this commission:  “Go therefore, and make disciples of people of all the nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father and of the Son and the holy spirit, teaching them to observe all the things I have commanded you. And, look! I am with you all the days, until the conclusion of the system of things.” – Matthew 28:19, 20.  Obviously, this would require preaching and teaching, which, incidentally, is incumbent on all of Jesus’ followers.

 

On his third appearance to his disciples, (after being raised from the dead), Jesus asked Simon Peter if he loved him. When Peter responded in the affirmative, Jesus said: “Feed my lambs.” When Jesus posed the same question, Peter responded in the affirmative once again, so Jesus said: “Shepherd my little sheep.” Then, a third time, Jesus asked Peter: “Do you have affection for me?” Peter became grieved and replied: “Lord, you know all things, you are aware that I have affection for you.”  Jesus said to him: “Feed my little sheep.” – John 21:14-17.  Jesus’ reference to those who follow him as, “little lambs” or “little sheep” that need feeding, underscores a valuable lesson, for it demonstrates that the Lord invites them to become part of his “domestics” (or household). 

 

Furthermore, by his usage of the diminutive, “little,” Jesus points out his affection for people. Such usage might also denote his reference to those who have just expressed faith in him and partake of the spiritual healing that he offers. At any rate, whether one is already part of God’s house, or just newly invited, such domestics all need feeding, which is provided by those who are faithful and discreet.  Again, it is obvious that the needs of some may be different from that of others.

 

Some believers erroneously conclude that Jesus’ instruction to Peter, (i.e., “feed my sheep”) was meant specifically for him. However, that Jesus merely used Peter as a “sounding board” is evident, not only because other disciples were present, but also because the Scriptures give specific admonition to preach, to teach, to make disciples, etc. For example, Paul wrote at Romans 10:9,10 “For if you publicly declare that word in your own mouth that Jesus is Lord, and exercise faith in your heart that God raised him up from the dead, you will be saved. For with the heart one exercises faith for righteousness, but with the mouth one makes public declaration for salvation.”  Paul also states: “How, in turn, will they hear without someone to preach?”  Good question! (Read Rom. 10:11-15) The reason people heard and learned about Christ during the period of the early Church is that Christians lived their faith and talked about it. They heeded Jesus commission to preach and make disciples, i.e., teaching them. Is it any different today?  Not at all!  (See Hebrews 13:15, which is quoted from Hosea 14:2)

 

Upon hearing the Christian message, lovers of righteousness are drawn to Christ by the Father. In turn, they experience spiritual healing, even as Jesus promised when he read Isaiah 61:1, 2. Such healing must have come to the Ephesian believers, for Paul wrote:  “Certainly, therefore, you are no longer strangers and alien residents, but you are fellow citizens of the holy ones and are members of the household of God.” – Eph. 2:19

 

In this age, the “living stones are being built up a spiritual house for the purpose of a holy priesthood to offer up spiritual sacrifices acceptable to God through Jesus Christ.” – 1 Peter 2:5.  Referring to these “living stones,” Peter added: “that you should declare abroad the excellencies of the one that called you out of darkness into his wonderful light.”

 

Thus, the Scriptures make it obvious that those who come to Christ (and experience spiritual healing) must, in turn, share the message with others. As members of God’s household, they must participate in the process that brings spiritual healing to others, thereby aiding in the spiritual progress of God’s “household.”  In this way, the servant that is “faithful and discreet” is feeding “the domestics.” To illustrate, in a family there may be children of all ages. The older children are often called upon to help with their younger siblings. Nevertheless, they all are part of the same household. Spiritually speaking, it is just like that. The point is that, in this way, God’s spiritual house is being built, even as Peter wrote. Thus we see a clear indication (from Scripture) that this is the “household” (domestics) to which Jesus referred.

 

While all of God’s servants have some ability to share “the primary doctrine about the Christ” (Heb. 6:1-3), [and they are encouraged to progress further], there are some who are specially gifted to shepherd, to teach, to evangelize and so forth. God uses such ones in a special way, namely, to serve their brothers and sisters. Why is this? Paul answers at Ephesians (4:12, 13) saying that God provides them “with a view to the readjustment of the holy ones, for ministerial work, for the building up of the body of the Christ, until we all attain to the oneness in the faith and in the accurate knowledge of the Son of God, to a full grown man, to the measure of stature that belongs to the fullness of the Christ.”

 

Such service is provided by “older men,” those who are more advanced spiritually. It is true that James said: “Not many of you should become teachers, my brothers, knowing we shall receive a heavier judgment.” (James 3:1) But was such counsel primarily for their benefit, or was it out of concern for the brothers? In the previous chapter (2:1), James wrote: “My brothers, you are not holding the faith of our Lord Jesus Christ…” They were practicing favoritism and class distinction.  They did not qualify as teachers. To do so would have brought “a heavier judgment” upon them, for they would have been hurting the brothers. James reminded them that teaching was a serious matter. Obviously, only those who walk by spirit should engage in teaching. Nevertheless, it is something one should reach out for. Hebrews 5:12, states: “For, indeed, although you ought to be teachers in view of the time, you again need someone to teach you from the beginning, the elementary things…” The Scriptures show that all believers should progress and be teachers, if even to a very limited degree. Nevertheless, God also “gave some as apostles, some as prophets, some as evangelizers, some as shepherds and teachers, with a view to the readjustment of the holy ones, for ministerial work, for the building up of the body of Christ.” (Eph. 4:11, 12) And while we do not have apostles and prophets as the early Christian ecclesia did, we do have shepherds, and teachers, and evangelizers who are doing similar work. The Scriptures show that such men are appointed by holy spirit. How so? First, they demonstrate the fruitage of the spirit in their lives, and the congregation would be aware of this. We have an example at Acts 6:3.  [Also read 1 Tim. 3:1-10; Titus 1:5-9] Moreover, the spirit may “beckon” them to serve, and the ecclesia, (congregation), “seeing how their conduct turns out” wants to “imitate their faith.” (Heb. 13:7)

 

 

Feeding The Domestics  At The Proper Time”

 

What is meant by the expression, “giving food to the domestics at the proper time?”   

 

In any family setting, feeding begins when the baby is born, and continues until the child becomes fully grown, an adult. Likewise, the apostle Peter shows that this process begins “with the milk of the word” when one first becomes a believer. For instance, in his first letter (2:2,3), Peter writes: “And as newborn infants, form a longing for the unadulterated milk belonging to the word, that through it you may grow to salvation, provided you have tasted that the Lord is kind.” Peter’s use of this metaphor, underscores the need to continue feeding on God’s unadulterated Word.

Spiritual growth is rather similar to natural growth, for one cannot remain a baby. At Hebrews 5:13, 14, Paul uses the same metaphor, milk, to show this. He states: “For everyone that partakes of milk is unacquainted with the word of righteousness, for he is a babe.  But solid food belongs to mature people, to those who through use have their perceptive powers trained to distinguish both right and wrong.” And what is “solid food?” Whatever the writer of Hebrews had in mind, he points out that it is something beyond “repentance from dead works,” “teaching on baptisms,” “laying on of the hands,” resurrection of the dead,” “and everlasting judgment.” (Read Heb. 5:12-6:2). These are elementary things, but Christians must move on to that which is more advanced, “solid food,” so what is it? 

“Solid food” means more than just advanced knowledge, for it is “through use” that “perceptive powers [are] trained to distinguish both right and wrong.” Obviously, it has to do with our Christian walk, that is, walking by spirit, (Rom. 8:4,5). Being born of “water and spirit” cannot be underestimated, for it is continuous. God’s Word is a “lamp to our foot and a light to our roadway” only if we become familiar with its contents. (See Psa. 119:105) For example, if we understand the Covenants that God made with Abraham, Moses, Israel and David, we will have a much greater appreciation for God’s New Covenant. This is very important because it all relates to our being sons of God. It is critical, too, that we know these things directly from the Scriptures, for we have God’s assurance that his holy spirit will teach us. (See 1 John 2:27)

 

Perhaps this is why John wrote in such a way as to acknowledge such spiritual growth. In 1 John 2:12 he states: “I am writing you, “little children,” because your sins have been forgiven you for the sake of his name.”  Verse 13, reads: “I write you, young children, because you have come to know the Father.” Verse 14, declares: “I write you, young men, because you are strong and the word of God remains in you, and you have conquered the wicked one.” And in the same verse he states: “I am writing you, fathers, because you have come to know him who is from the beginning.” It would seem reasonable to assume that just as in a natural family, food provided to God’s household would be commensurate with each one’s stage of development. It appears, too, that “the proper time” cannot refer to a specific time period in history, as such feeding has gone on (in some measure) for close to two thousand years.

 

 

“He Will Appoint Him Over All His Belongings”

 

To those who provide “food supplies at the proper time,” Jesus said: “Happy is that slave, if his master on arriving finds him doing so. I tell you truthfully, He will appoint him over all of his belongings.” (Luke 12:43) So then, what are “all his belongings?”   At Revelation 2:26, Jesus provides the answer: “And to him that conquers and observes my deeds down to the end, I will give authority over the nations.” (See Psalm 2)  Never did Jesus say his slaves would be given authority over fellow slaves while he was away. Quite the contrary, for in Luke 17:10, Jesus stated: “So you, also, when you have done all the things assigned to you, say, “We are good-for-nothing slaves. What we have done is what we ought to have done.”

 

Clearly, no authority is given to any slave(s) in this age, much less over fellow slaves. So how are we to understand Hebrews 13:17, which states: “Be obedient to those taking the lead among you and be submissive, for they are keeping watch over your souls as those who will render an account; that they may do this with joy and not with sighing, for this would be damaging to you?” The answer is given at Heb.13:7, and reads: “Remember those who are taking the lead among you, who have spoken the word of God to you, and as you contemplate how [their] conduct turns out imitate [their] faith.” Is their conduct and their faith worthy of imitating? If they are humble servants, walking by spirit and showing love to the congregation, submitting to them should be a joy. One would want to show “double honor” to such faithful servants for their hard work among them.  But can such positions be considered ‘an office of authority?’ Quite the contrary, for those are positions of service to the brothers.  For this reason, brothers who provide shepherding and teaching must be very careful not to be found “beating their fellow slaves.”

 

It is service to one’s brothers and sisters that makes one “great,” even as Jesus said at Matthew 20:26, 27.  Paul’s words to Timothy (1 Tim. 5:17) that “the older men who preside in a fine way be reckoned worthy of double honor, especially those who work hard in speaking and teaching,” should be considered in the context of Jesus’ own admonition on the matter of service to one’s fellow slaves.  “Double honor” surely does not mean to put that one on a pedestal, but rather, to show genuine gratitude and appreciation for their loving service.

 

Slaves must be found faithful in discharging their duties while the master is away. They must also conquer,” for conquest precedes the granting of authority. The Scriptures make that very clear! One must be found faithful, “down to the end” (of his life), awaiting the first resurrection, or be among “the living, who survive to the presence (parousia) of the Lord” (i.e., when Christ returns to commence his rule, and is joined by those who were “faithful and discreet”).

 

Appointment “over all of Christ’s belongings,” will only be given to the one “that endures to the end.” - Matt. 24:13. Moreover, Jesus said “everlasting life” is a reward that will be granted “in the age to come.” - Luke 18:30.  [See Westcott and Hort’s Greek text for this transliteration.  Note: The NWT translates the phrase “in the age to come” as “in the coming system of things.”]

 

 

At The Same Time”  and  “Together With Them

 

In 1 Thessalonians 4:14-17, the apostle Paul clearly indicates that those in union with Christ (his bride) will receive their reward at the same time. He states: “we the living, who survive to the presence of the Lord, shall in no way precede those who have fallen asleep (in death).”  He then adds, “and those who are dead in union with Christ will rise first.” He continues: “Afterward, we the living who are surviving, will together with them be caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air…” [Note 9]  Please note that in the Greek text (of Westcott and Hort), Paul uses two Greek words which are transliterated “at the same time” and “together with them.” In other words, all the members of the body of Christ will “together with them”, “at the same time,” be “caught away in clouds to meet the Lord in the air.” [What this means, essentially, is that the reward of life, and the appointment over “all his belongings,” is granted to all the members of Christ’s “Bride,” simultaneously.  This is reasonable, for they all rule with Christ.

 

The “air” Paul speaks of, where they meet the Lord, translates the same Greek word, aeer, (meaning “to breathe unconsciously”) that is used in Ephesians 2:2, where he writes, “You at one time walked according to the system of things of this world, according to the ruler of the authority of the air, the spirit that now operates in the sons of disobedience.”  It would seem reasonable to conclude that “the authority of the air” consists of man’s rule over which its ruler, Satan the devil, is god. That ruler will be replaced, as will his kingdoms (Dan 2:44) by Christ Jesus and his Bride. The rule of Christ will then embrace “all of his belongings.”

 

Please bear in mind that Christ Jesus is identified as the seed of promise at Galatians 3:16.  Nevertheless, in verse 29, his Bride is also identified as the seed of Abraham. Therefore, it is by means of them that “all the nations of the earth will bless themselves.” (Genesis 22:18) It is for this reason too, that the appointment “over all his belongings” can only take place when Christ returns, and “those in union with Christ” (1 Thess. 4:16) are resurrected.  Then “together with them,” “at the same time,” (1 Thess. 4:17) they will join Christ Jesus “in clouds” (or great numbers, as in Heb. 12:1, “a great cloud of witnesses”) [Note 9] to replace the ruler of the authority of the air, for they are the legitimate administration for this earth. This is God’s promised kingdom. Of course, the Bride of Christ is merely the “first-fruits” of those who return to God (in “this age”). In “the age to come,” they will serve as “the tent of God (that) is with mankind,” together with their Lord, Christ Jesus” (See Revelation 21:3) 

Speaking of mankind, the record continues: “And God himself will be with them. And he will wipe out every tear from their eyes, and death will be no more, neither will mourning, nor outcry nor pain be anymore. The former things have passed away. And the One seated on the throne [Almighty God] said: “Look! I am making all things new.’ Also, he says: “Write, because these things are faithful and true.” And he said to me: “They have come to pass! I am the Alpha and Omega, the beginning and the end. To anyone thirsting I will give from the fountain of the water of life free. Anyone conquering (in contrast to 21:8) will inherit these things, and I shall be his God and he will be my son.” -  Rev. 21:3-7.

 

It is to “anyone thirsting,” that God will provide “a fountain of water of life.” How will he do this?  You may recall Jesus’ words at John 4:14, where he said: “Whoever drinks from the water that I will give him will never get thirsty at all, but the water that I will give him will become in him a fountain of water bubbling up to impart everlasting life.” Those who drink of this “water” today, (in this age), become “fountains of water bubbling up to impart everlasting life.” How? It is by sharing God’s life-saving message with others. In this way, they are “feeding the domestics.” In the age to come, they will continue to do so for the blessing of all mankind, but on a much greater and grander scale.  What is more, those who will derive benefit “from the fountain of the water of life,” that is, from the tent (or Church) that God provides for mankind, will be the recipients of God’s promise:  “Anyone conquering will inherit these things, and I shall be his God and he shall be my son.”  [Note 11] This is so because the Bride of Christ (though unique) is merely the “firstfruits” of those that will follow, those who are to be blessed by means of her. (Rev. 14:4)

 

When Jesus and his Bride begin to rule, they will serve as the tent (or temple) of God that is with mankind. (Rev. 21:3) They are the instrument God will use to bring about “restoration of all things.” – Acts 3:21.  It is then that “all the families of the earth will bless themselves” by means of the seed of Abraham, i.e.,  Christ Jesus and his co-rulers. (See Rev. 2:26 & Psalm 2) 

 

 

Summary

 

It is obvious that Jesus’ account of the master and his slaves (as recorded at Matthew 24:45-51 and Luke 12:42-48) is a parable, very similar to those he gave at Matthew 25:14-30 and 20:1-16. [Pay special attention to Matthew 20:10-16.]

 

Jesus did not say he would ‘raise up’ a “faithful and discreet slave” to interpret the Scriptures, or to have authority over the master’s other slaves but, rather, to “feed his little sheep,” for such are in the household, and all need their food at the proper time. All of God’s servants [according to their ability], under the direction of Christ Jesus, are obligated to participate. Although some have special abilities, and may use such in serving their brothers, in God’s eyes they are no better positioned than their fellow slaves. God has provided the Holy Scriptures as the only authority of final reference, and all of his servants must be guided by his Word. All must be “faithful and discreet,” and all must “conquer and observe his deeds down to the end.” The reward for those who do so is to be “appointed over all of his belongings.”  And when will that be?  It will take place when Jesus returns to replace man’s rule with God’s Kingdom. Those who are appointed “over all his belongings” will participate in that rule as “kings and priests.” They will be given authority, not over their fellow slaves, but over the nations.

 

In view of what the Scriptures clearly show, it is presumptuous for any to claim they have already been appointed “over all of Christ’s belongings.”  It is equally presumptuous for them to claim they are “God’s Channel of communication.” There is no support in Scripture, whatsoever, to substantiate such outlandish and false claims, for they are (clearly) not founded on God’s Word, but on the speculation of men.

 

The only “Channel of communication” available to mankind today is God’s own written Word. God “raised up” prophets, and spoke through them.  Last of all, he spoke through his Son, Christ Jesus, even as Hebrews 1:1, 2, states: “God, who long ago spoke on many occasions, and in many ways, to our forefathers by means of the prophets, has at the end of these days spoken to us by means of a Son, whom he appointed heir of all things…” There’s no indication in Scripture, whatsoever, that “in the last days” men would be given special authority to speak for God. All we have is the word of Jesus (who does have authority) saying that his slaves were expected to feed his household, and that those who are doing so when he returns, “will be appointed over all of his belongings.”

 

When Charles Russell studied God’s Word, he came to understand many wonderful truths. He once wrote: “These precious truths are given freely to all in Christ by the Lord, the Holy Spirit being our teacher.”- 1 John 2:27. (Harvest Gleanings Three, P. 220) Nevertheless, he also arrived at conclusions that were in error. Why? It is because he was not inspired.  An example of this is the year 1874. Another is the year 1881, (the year in which the resurrection of the saints supposedly began), but later was changed to 1918, by Rutherford. Until his death, Russell believed Christ Jesus returned in 1874, and wrote that it was the beginning of a 40-year harvest that would end in 1914, at which time the kingdoms of this world would be replaced with God’s kingdom. He lived to see those predictions fail.  [However, most Bible Students still accept the 1874 and 1881 dates as correct.]

 

Furthermore, for many years he believed and wrote that the “new covenant” (foretold at Jeremiah 31:31-33) was fulfilled upon the Christian Church, which the Scriptures clearly show to be the case, as at Hebrews 8:8-13; 10:15-17, and elsewhere. However, in 1909 he wrote a few articles in Zion’s Watchtower, reversing his original position, and stated that the “New Covenant” applied to natural Israel in the future, rather than to the Christian Church in this gospel age. Consequently, this caused great consternation in the movement, and many broke ranks with the Society. [This view was later reversed by the Watch Tower Society’s next president, but most Bible Students still hold to that.]  Toward the end of his presidency, Rutherford also discarded 1874 (as the year of Christ’s “invisible presence”) and changed it to 1914. The 1881 date was changed as well, to 1918.  This is what Jehovah’s Witnesses still believe.  [On the other hand, the Bible Students understand the New Covenant just as Russell did.]

 

The “invisible presence” doctrine led Russell to believe that Jesus appointed “the faithful and wise servant over all his belongings” doctrine. [One erroneous doctrine begot another.] Moreover, he allowed a belief to develop that he was that “faithful and discreet servant” whom Jesus had appointed. Russell failed to see (likewise, his successors) that an appointment “over all of his  (Jesus’) belongings” cannot be made until Jesus returns to remove the kingdoms of this world, and replaces them with God’s kingdom which consists of him (Jesus) and his complete body, his Bride. Only then, not before, will Jesus do as promised, appointing the faithful slave: “And to him that conquers and observes my deeds down to the end, I will give authority over the nations” Rev. 2:26. 

 

The Scriptures clearly indicate that there are two serious problems with the conclusions reached by Russell. First, the parable of the “faithful and discreet slave” does not apply to any single individual, but to all of Jesus’ faithful servants (of whom Russell was only one) who are feeding his domestics. Secondly, one cannot be “appointed over all of his belongings” before having “conquered and observed Jesus’ deeds down to the end.” Jehovah’s Witnesses continue to stumble over this erroneous understanding which they inherited from Russell. 

 

Please consider this: God does not make mistakes. Neither did the prophets of old, for they “spoke from God as they were borne along by holy spirit.” (2 Peter 1:21)  On the other hand, uninspired men, though sincere, do make mistakes, for they cannot legitimately claim that “God speaks by them.”  For that reason, not all that they say is, necessarily, what God is saying.  It’s as simple as that!  Sometimes they get it right, and at other times they get it wrong. And while there is no sin in being wrong, refusing to admit error, when it is pointed out from the Scriptures, is another matter.

 

 

 

Concluding Remarks

 

It must be pointed out that, while it is vital to expose teachings that are not in harmony with the Scriptures, it is equally important to avoid “beating our fellow slaves.” And even though fellow slaves might speak injuriously of us, or others, please remember that a “faithful and discreet slave” will not engage in such behavior. We must love all people, and not be judging them, for God has appointed his Son, Christ Jesus “to be the judge of the living and the dead.” – Acts 10:42.  What others do is their own responsibility before God, but all will be held accountable for the things they said and the things they did.

 

[For some information about the Author, please refer to My Story, as told by Lewis Zenovay Hrytzak, at: www. homecristians.net - Experiences]

 

 

 

Notes

 

      1.  As for the Gentile Times ending in 1914, chronology does not support that conclusion at all, for Jerusalem was not destroyed in 607 BCE, (as Russell assumed), but in 586/7 BCE. There are many historical documents to verify this. Such references are listed in a book by Carl Olof Jonsson, called, “The Gentile Times Reconsidered.”  It should be patently obvious that if the chronology is erroneous, so is the 1914 date.  In turn, appointment of the faithful slave over all of the master’s belongings could not have taken place either.

 

 

      2.  Several years later, Russell separated from Barbour over the issue of the ransom sacrifice of Christ Jesus. They disagreed as to how the sacrifice applied. Consequently, Russell began to publish his own magazine (Zion’s Watchtower), but he firmly believed that Jesus had returned (invisibly) in 1874. [He also believed the resurrection of the saints began in 1881.]

He seemed particularly convinced of the year 1874, for it was around this time that  a friend of his (B. W. Keith) had noticed in his personal copy of Benjamin Wilson’s Emphatic Diaglott that the Greek word (parousia) was translated as presence, rather than coming, (as other translations show that rendering). Actually, the Greek word parousia means both, coming and presence. It was used that way in Bible times, i.e., a king came into a village or city with his entourage (his coming) and stayed for a few days (his presence). At any rate, the 1874 date gave birth to the “invisible presence” doctrine.

 

 

      3.   In 1909, Russell wrote a few articles in Zion’s Watchtower, stating that the New Covenant (Jeremiah 31:31-33) did not apply to the Christian Church but to natural Israel. This caused a serious schism, because it was a direct reversal of what he had previously believed and written. Here is an excerpt from Zion’s Watchtower, January, 1909, page 12 of what he wrote:

 

Before we discerned the Scriptural teaching of the "Plan of the Ages," showing the Law Age, the Gospel Age and the Millennial Age, and their several works, we knew no future place to apply the promises respecting the New Covenant, and hence, in common with others, we applied them to ourselves and this Gospel Age, entirely overlooking the various Scriptures to the contrary. It was very inconsistent for us to quote in one breath the Apostle's statement that we are members of the Isaac Seed, the children of the old, original Covenant, and then in the next breath to class ourselves as beneficiaries of the New Covenant. The difficulty all along was our failure to clearly discern the "mystery hidden from past ages and dispensations, but now revealed unto the saints."--Col. 1:26. Had we studied the Lord's Word in a more saintly fashion, we might the sooner have gotten rid of the errors of the Dark Ages and have apprehended afresh the Apostolic teaching, namely, that the "Mystery" is that the Church, selected from both Jews and Gentiles to be the Body of Christ, are joint-heirs with him in the Abrahamic Covenant and in his entire inheritance. Only those who discern the truth of this, which is still a "Mystery" with the world and the nominal Church, are prepared to understand the "Divine Plan of the Ages" as a whole.”

 

Consequently, many brothers left the group at that time. Some went to Australia and called themselves the New Covenant Bible Students. The name was later changed to Free Bible Students, and they are still active. Others who broke away remained in the United States.

 

 

      4.   Judge Rutherford succeeded Russell as President of the Watch Tower Society. However, as he was not the choice of several of those who were on the Board, and had been closely associated with Russell, he used his legal expertise to have Russell’s will invalidated, and moved to replace the board. Now he was able to have those vacancies filled with persons of his own choice. Naturally, this caused a great deal of ill will, not only among those who had been asked to resign from the Board of Directors, but also among many others who were aware of what had taken place. Consequently, many decided to leave the Watch Tower Society. That group came to be known as Bible Students, and they remain active in many countries of the world until this day. They also insist they are the original Watch Tower movement. Of course, Jehovah’s Witnesses do continue to own the legal entity called The Watch Tower, Bible and Tract Society. 

 

 

       5.  The NWT translates the Greek verb, kathisteemi as “appointed” at Matthew 24:45 and “will appoint” at Luke 12:42. [This is in keeping with Greek texts used.] Although it is the same account of what Jesus said, Matthew uses the past tense, while Luke uses the future tense.  What accounts for this difference?  Writing from his Hebrew background, Matthew uses the past tense. (Hebrew has only a past and future tense). In this instance, the past tense is actually quite fitting because Jesus said: “whom the master “appoint/ed” or “place/d in charge.” Next, he shows that if faithful, the slave will be appointed over all his belongings. On the other hand, Luke writes Greek as a Greek person would. He uses the future tense, which is also suitable because the master was to leave his slaves in charge “over his domestics” before he departed.

 

     6.   Luke 12:41 is the preamble to Luke’s account about the faithful and discreet slave (servant), and Peter’s words to Jesus clearly show that his disciples understood this to be an illustration or parable.

 

     7.   The Greek noun, (therapeia) means ‘household,’ as a verb (‘therapeuo’), it means “to care for,” “wait upon,” “to heal, restore, cure someone from illness.” It is used that way at Luke 9:11 & Rev. 22:2. 

 

     8.  The calling of each one seems to be radically different, one from another. Several people, some personally known by me, have had unique experiences which can best be described as the ‘promptings’ of God’s holy spirit. Two of these were on the verge of suicide, but after they prayed, (in both cases) they sensed an inner peace, a reassuring calmness that came over them. On the following day, they (each, separately) had the unexpected visit of a Christian to encourage them, and to study the Bible with them.  Another unique example is that of a young man who had just returned from the military.  He was not a Christian, but out of curiosity he went (with some of his friends) to a ‘Billy Graham’ Crusade.  On his way to the platform, God’s divine plan of salvation “flashed before his eyes.” None of his friends shared this experience. It was unique to him.  Some time later, he got a Bible and began to read it, but could not understand what he was reading. And so he prayed about it. Shortly thereafter, he came across a book, (Divine Plan of the Ages), by C. T. Russell, and to his great amazement and utter surprise, its contents were exactly what had “flashed before his eyes” a few years before.

Two other examples are of persons who had been Christians for many years. One day, each one felt touched by God’s holy spirit, and realized it meant a relationship with God, (i.e., son-ship).

Yet another example is that of my wife. As a young woman, she felt overwhelmed by life’s difficult experiences and regularly went to a nearby hill to meditate and pray. “One day, suddenly,” she relates: “I felt surrounded by God’s love, reassuring me that he really cares for me.” My own situation is that, from a very young lad, I have always felt very close to God. But when I understood what a relationship with him really meant, it was only then that my feelings of being God’s son were confirmed to me by his spirit.

 

      9.   The Greek word “nephele,” translated “clouds” in 1 Thess. 4:17, is not preceded by the definite article “ho,” meaning “the.” Thus, the text should read: “caught away in clouds.” [Many translations insert the definite article “the” (before the word “clouds”) which does not appear in the Greek text.]

 

     10.  The phrase “caught away in clouds” obviously refers to great numbers, for it is used that way at Hebrews 12:1 “…because we have so great a cloud of witnesses surrounding us.”

 

     11.   The temple, or “house of God,” was formerly a tabernacle or tent.  Peter refers to the temple of “living stones,” as a “spiritual house” for the purpose of a “holy priesthood.”(1 Peter 2:5) This is the Bride of Christ, the “New Jerusalem,” the “Lamb’s wife.” (See Revelation 21:1-3)  She is also called “the tent of God” that is “with mankind,.” (She will actually be with mankind after being appointed over all of Jesus’ belongings).  This “tent of God” will serve as a blessing for the nations of the earth, just as promised to Abraham. (Gen. 22:18)

     12.   Acknowledgement:  Special thanks are expressed to Gordon Coulson for his kind efforts in proof-reading and providing constructive suggestions.

Return to Articles

Last Updated: Jan 11 2008