This is now an orphan site
On October 30, 2010, I posted a consolidated version
of my three magic hypercube sites to
|Feb. 2010 Much more about Compact and Complete. Small order-4 multiply cubes. Frost Whipple model order-9 nasik. First pantriagonal associated order-4? etc.|
|Nov. 2007 All about magic tesseracts. A new site (because of space) consisting of 11 pages.|
|May 2007. Magic cuboids, Magic Knight Tours,
transform associated to pantriagonal.
Also miscellaneous items and links.
|Dec. 2006. I expanded the cube timeline that
originally appeared on my Magic Cubes - the Road to Perfect page.
Then moved it to a separate page. I included a copy of Table of First Cubes (which is on my Summary page.
|A brief explanation of the rational and history|
|Magic cubes may logically be put into 6 classes|
|A list of the pages with brief table of contents|
|What I looked at when comparing magic cubes|
|A brief discussion regarding contents|
Several years ago John R. Hendricks introduced a coordinated set of definitions for magic cubes. It included a new definition for the ‘perfect’ magic cube, which is applicable for magic hypercubes of any dimension.
This inspired me to investigate the different definitions of ‘perfect’ magic cubes that had appeared over the years. The result was a new page that discussed the subject. However, I ended up with more questions then when I started, so developed a series of spreadsheets to investigate many characteristics of magic cubes.
After looking closely at over 200 published magic
cubes of order 3 to 17, I am amazed at how few cubes I found that had all
identical features. Considering the large number of possible combinations
available to form a magic cube of a given order, it is not surprising I found
very few duplicate cubes. However, features such as number, type, and location
of included magic squares, feature variations in the oblique squares, etc., were
found to be extremely varied.
The result is this new series of pages, which explores the subject in some depth. With one or two possible exceptions, all magic cubes shown on these pages will have different features (or at least will be different orders).
As is usual with the other pages on this site, I intend to keep the discussions simple and will not normally go into methods of construction. Methods, and involved mathematics, will be left to others that are more qualified to present them. These pages will be more concerned with basic principles and a survey of the history and variety of magic cubes.
This site is simple to navigate. The pages are listed in sequence in the index (although, of course, they do not have to be read in that order).
At the bottom of each page are left and right pointing arrows that link to the previous and next pages. The 'top' button goes to the top of the page. The 'up' button will return you to this page.
The buttons at the top of each page go to:
'Home" goes to My Magic-squares.net web site. The 'square', 'star', and '#' go to the start page of each major division of that site.
The 'cube' button returns you to this page.
There is a general links section on the index page of the Magic-squares site as well as a combined site map of of the two sites.
As usual with my Web pages, I welcome comments, both laudatory and critical. Magic cubes covers a wide field and I am sure everyone may not agree with everything I have said on these pages. Also, some may feel I have put too much emphasis on certain subjects and not enough on others. I can only respond that this is how I see it.
I would like to thank some of those who helped me with my
research of magic cubes. In no particular order they are Christian Boyer, Walter
Trump, Aale de Winkel, John
Hendricks, Abhinav Soni, and Mitsutoshi Nakamura. Links to many of their sites
are on my
Some others who helped in a lesser degree are Paul Vaderlind, Brian Alspach, Mark Swaney, Vladimír Karpenko, Jacques Sesiano, Rich Schroeppel. I apologize for any I may have missed. Thanks to all of you.
It is almost inevitable that despite the utmost care, a work of this size will contain some errors. I apologize for any and appreciate them being brought to my attention.
December 30, 2003. I now consider this site on magic cubes complete. However, I intend to keep updating it as new material becomes available. Please refer to my Summary page where I show a consolidation of what has been accomplished in this field
The following definitions will be used throughout this web
site. They are presented here simply as a concise introduction to the subject.
Examples and further explanation will be presented where appropriate.
See especially: Perfect magic Cubes, Perfect Cubes - 2, and Magic Cube Definitions.
NOTE: In January, 2005, a 6th class was added to the
previous 5 classes.
Diagonal of PantriagDiag for short.
Mitsutoshi Nakamura has an excellent site on magic hypercubes, and has extensively researched their classes. His definitions page is at http://homepage2.nifty.com/googol/magcube/en/terms.htm
Minimum requirements are: All rows, columns, pillars, and 4 triagonals must sum to the same value.
An unambiguous term that may be used in place of the term perfect (which has differing meanings). See (perfect).
Contains NO, or less then 3m orthogonal magic squares.
All 4m2 pantriagonals must sum correctly (that is 4 one-segment, 12(m-1) two-segment, and 4(m-2)(m-1) three-segment). There may be some simple AND/OR pandiagonal magic squares, but not enough to satisfy any other classifications.
The pantriagonal magic cube is similar to a pandiagonal magic square in this respect. A pandiagonal magic square may be transformed to another pandiagonal magic square by moving a row or column from one side of the square to the opposite side. Similarly, a pantriagonal magic cube may be transformed into another pantriagonal magic cube by moving a plane from one side of the cube to the other! Furthermore, a panquadragonal magic tesseract may be transformed to another one by moving a cube from one side to the other! Etc.
All 3m planar arrays must be 'simple' magic squares (some may be pandiagonal). i.e. all planar diagonals must sum correctly.
The 6 oblique squares will then automatically be magic. The smallest normal diagonal magic cube is order 5.
These squares were referred to as ‘Perfect’ by Gardner and others! At the same time he referred to Langman’s 1962 pandiagonal cube as ‘Perfect’.
Pantriagonal Diagonal – A magic cube that is a
combination Pantriagonal and Diagonal cube. All main and broken triagonals must
sum correctly, In addition, it will contain 3m order m simple
magic squares in the orthogonal planes, and 6 order m pandiagonal magic
squares in the oblique planes.
For short, I will reduce this unwieldy name to PantriagDiag. This is number 4 in what is now 6 classes of magic cubes. So far, very little is known of this class of cube. The only ones constructed so far are order 8 (not associated and associated).
This cube was discovered in 2004 by Mitsutoshi Nakamura.
ALL 3m planar arrays must be ‘pandiagonal’ magic squares. The 6 oblique squares are always magic. Several of them MAY be pandiagonal magic.
Gardner also called this (Langman’s pandiagonal) a ‘perfect’ cube, presumably not realizing it was a higher class then Myer’s cube.
ALL 3m planar arrays must be ‘pandiagonal’ magic squares. In addition, ALL pantriagonals must sum correctly. These two conditions combine to provide a total of 9m pandiagonal magic squares. When Hendricks devised this classification system, he called this perfect. However, because there are different definitions of perfect, Nasik is a better choice.
A hypercube of dimension n is perfect if all pan-r-agonals sum correctly. Then all lower dimension hypercubes contained in it are also perfect!
Through every cell on a perfect hypercube of dimension n there are (3n-1)/2 different routes that must sum the magic sum.
A. H. Frost (1866) referred to all but the simple magic
cube as Nasik! See a
quotation by C. Planck, in which he redefined nasik to mean a Hendricks perfect
Nasik is an unambiguous term that should be used in place of the term perfect.
|Displaying a magic cube, basic parts, associated, orthogonal and oblique squares, basic cube and aspects, coordinates. species.|
|A discussion of common terms relating to magic cubes.|
|My original page on perfect magic cubes. I have left it pretty well untouched, so there will be a small amount of overlapping between it and Perfect Cubes - 2.|
|The progression to perfect cubes. Presented is 1 cube each of orders 3 to 11.|
|15 different cubes from Fermat's 1640 order 4 to Worthington's 1910 order 6.|
|8 assorted cubes published by Rev. Frost in 1866 and 1878.|
|And other magic objects from his 1888 paper.|
|The only four order 3 basic cubes, and some variations. An order 3 cube from the central plane of a tesseract. An 1899 magic cube.|
|Over 20 order 4 cubes. All have different characteristics.|
|A variety of 8 cubes, published between 1876 and 2001. Also the Trump/Boyer diagonal order 5 cube of 2003.|
|A variety of 7 cubes, published between 1838 and 1999.|
|A variety of 7 cubes, published between 1922 and 2001.|
|A variety of 6 cubes, published between 1908 and 2001.|
|Three simple magic cubes, all with slightly different features.|
|Three simple magic cubes, one of them with an order 6 inlaid cube.|
|A simple, a pantriagonal, and 2 perfect order 11 cubes.|
|A pantriagonal, a diagonal, and a simple, but inlaid order 12 magic cube.|
|A perfect cube, an unusual pantriagonal cube, an example of a broken plane.|
|Some order 15, 16 and 17 magic cubes. Most notably Gabriel Arnoux's perfect magic cube of 1887|
|Arnoux demonstrated a multitude of magic patterns in his order 17 perfect magic cube. Investigation reveals that these patterns are common in all types and orders of magic hypercubes.|
|Seven order 5 cubes that are magic because all relevant line sums are evenly divisible by the same number i.e. 2, 3, 5, 10, 31, 62.|
|Presenting the world's first Bimagic and Trimagic cubes|
||Monster Cubes A paper by Christian Boyer announcing further advances in multimagic cubes and tesseracts.|
|Boyer-16 The complete listing Boyer's bimagic order 16 cube of Jan. 23, 2003|
|Boyer-32 The top horizontal plane of Boyer's bimagic order 32 cube of Jan. 27, 2003|
|Dudeney groups I to VI magic squares and their magic cube equivalents.|
|Two order 3 prime cubes. An order 4 simple cube, and an order 4 pantriagonal.|
|Three different types of order 3 multiply cubes. An order 4 and an order 5 cube. A multiply magic cube parlor trick.|
|An order 9 cube consisting of 27 order 3 cubes, an order 12 cube with 27 order 4 cubes, and a new method using multiplication for another order 9 cube.|
|Order 8 cubes with 1, 8, and 27 inlaid order 4. Order 12 with 8 order 4 pantriagonal magic cubes and 48 order 4 pandiagonal magic squares.|
|Description, pictures, and listings of my model of 6 order 4 cubes in one.|
|Different types of symmetrical cubes. Thanks Walter Trump!|
|A short description of the characteristics of pandiagonal and semi-pandiagonal magic squares and their counterpart in the pantriagonal and semi-pantriagonal magic cubes.|
|About 15 cubes that are not magic in the ordinary sense, but are unusual!|
|Discussion and examples of the 3-dimensional equivalent of the most-perfect magic square.|
|Cube_16 Listings of two order 16 perfect magic cubes. Only one is most-perfect.|
|Lists of books and papers on magic cubes that I referenced when building this set of pages.|
|Some of my Word and Excel magic cube documents available for downloading.|
|Concluding remarks, amazing new advances in magic cube knowledge, and some challenges!|
|Contains material that I received in January, 2004. (Heterocube, Purely Pan cube, Magic ratio, etc.)|
|Contains information I received to April 30, 2004. (Cubes (1757), Order 6 Projection cube, etc.).|
|Contains information I received to during the last nine months of 2004. Nested order 16, New class, etc.|
|Aug. 2005. More on Panmagic ratios, Semi-diagonal magic order 4, The Leibniz cube, Prime magical cubes.|
|May 2007. Magic cuboids, Magic Knight Tours,
transform associated to pantriagonal.
Also miscellaneous items and links.
|Feb. 2010. Compact & complete. Frost Whipple model. Order-4 multiply. etc.|
|An expanded version of the timeline originally on my Magic Cubes - the Road to Perfect page.|
By the use of Excel spreadsheets, I examined the
characteristics of about 260 (Dec./03) published magic cubes. I limited the tests to orders
3 to 17 because of the scarcity of larger published cubes, and the increased
effort required to enter the larger cubes into the spreadsheets.
That is about at the practical limit using this spreadsheet approach. The file size for order 16 is over 2 MB!
A different spreadsheet design was required for each order, but they all had the following features in common.
Features the spreadsheet looked at:
These features were tabulated in a Word document (CubeComparison.doc) for each cube in the collection.
For each additional cube within an order, I simply made a copy of the spreadsheet, then pasted or typed in the horizontal plane numbers..
Please send me Feedback about my Web
Harvey Heinz firstname.lastname@example.org
This page last updated October 31, 2010
Copyright © 2003 by Harvey D. Heinz