guybabineau.com

home / about / channel surfing in the sea of happiness / contact

Retroactivity
The Wizard of Oz, Pleasantville, Velvet Goldmine
by Guy Babineau
The Wizard of Oz
Even though time, according to the philosophers, is 
an artificial construct, most of us set our clocks by 
it; alarm, biological or otherwise. The crystal-
balling futurists say that cyberspace will take as 
back to a more primal understanding of time—or 
lack of understanding—since there’s no morning, 
noon or night in the online universe.
Most of us today have lost our circadian rhythms 
and spend our time keeping up, losing sleep and 
feeling out-of-step. We turn to artistic things, high 
brow and low brow, to help us appreciate or 
comprehend the changes around us, or to make us 
feel that we belong, often turning to nostalgia.
There’s a crystal ball in the movie The Wizard Oz, 
heightening Dorothy Gale’s homesickness for 
Kansas. “Aunty Em, Aunty Em!” cries Dorothy, 
trapped in the Wicked Witch of the West’s castle as 
she stares at the crystal ball for images of home 
while, literally, the sands of time run out in an 
hourglass beside it. The classic film enjoyed a 
digitally remastered reprise in 1998 in theaters 
across North America. The movie is a talisman for 
anyone who saw it as a kid and we want kids to 
keep seeing it just so we can have an excuse to view 
it again.
The Wizard of Oz is a basic coming of age hero 
story. To fight for what she loves and believes in (in 
this case a dog) a kid leaves home on an adventure 
quest. At the end, with the help of some over-the-
top shoes, she finds out that you can’t run from your 
problems, that you have to have the courage of your 
convictions, that home is where the heart is. Oz, 
“where troubles melt like lemon drops way above 
the chimney tops”, is a childhood fantasy of a 
perfect world traumatized by inevitable mortality 
(the witch).
You could get into an endless debate about the 
moral and philosophical pros and cons of The 
Wizard Oz, but they all amount to a hill of beans 
when Judy Garland breaks into Somewhere Over 
the Rainbow.
Part of the reason we can’t part company with this 
movie is that the making and media manipulation of 
1939’s The Wizard of Oz was an important 
cornerstone in the mythologizing of technology, 
making it one of the first movies to be so 
postmodernly plundered. There are endless accounts 
of Margaret Hamilton’s foam witch make-up 
catching fire in a special effects disaster, boozing 
munchkins, and the neverending gossip about 
Garland’s pharmacology, but penultimate was the 
studio’s exploitation and promotion of new color 
technologies, with the film’s black & white to color 
back to black & white structure. ‘How the story 
served the technology’ had never before been so 
ballyhooed.
Pleasantville
The kid in 1939’s Wizard of Oz (link) goes from a 
frumpy, black & white mid-America into a 
dangerous multidimensional world of endless color 
and possibilities, and wants to go home. In 
Pleasantville, two kids in 1998’s multidimensional 
world of color and possibilities, which like Oz is 
threatened by mortality—this time around the 
wicked witch is AIDS, nuclear stockpiles and 
greenhouse gas emissions—are transported into the 
frumpy, black & white Mid-America world of 
1950s television, and want to go home.
Nerdy highschooler David (Tobey Maguire) is 
addicted to reruns of a ‘50s Father Knows Best-
style family sitcom called Pleasantville. He has 
been given a supernatural remote control by an odd 
television repairman (Don Knotts). The device 
whisks David and his popular, sexy, status 
conscious twin sister Jennifer (Reese Witherspoon) 
inside the TV, and into Pleasantville’s 
monochromatic plotline.
Most of this Capraesque movie chronicles what 
happens to the people of Pleasantville when David 
and Jennifer expose them to sex, art and literature; 
not to mention losing basketball games for the first 
time, toilets, bigotry, double beds and housewives 
who don’t have dinner waiting on the table. Each 
new discovery adds a splash of color to the people 
and their town.
Writer/director Gary Ross’s track record would 
inevitably lead to Pleasantville’s not-too-hard-on-
the-brain message of humanism. He wrote the 
movies Big and Dave, and was a speech writer for 
former presidential hopeful Michael Dukakis and 
President Bill Clinton. On the plus side, William H. 
Macy is terrific as George, the sitcom father. As his 
wife Betty, Joan Allen is extraordinary and is 
responsible for the film’s few moments of real 
emotional depth.
The complex technical gimmickry required to make 
these scenes work is the film’s big payoff. The film 
delivers its moral message with a sledgehammer. 
There’s no real danger in this movie, no new ideas. 
Part of the problem is that the kids from 1998 
inhabit a world equally as stereotypical as 
Pleasantville. Yet, in the end you walk away with a 
good, old-fashioned PC sense of well-being. If you 
want to see a feelgood film, this one delivers 
stylishly.
 Velvet Goldmine
Many moviemakers today offer simplistic 
observations about lifestyles and pop culture in 
previous decades, painted with a skewed palette of 
contemporary subjectivity. It allows us to feel 
superior. In Pleasantville, it’s the 1950s. In Velvet 
Goldmine, it’s the glamrock scene of early 1970s 
London.
Velvet Goldmine is all style. The film is a thinly 
disguised—and thinly told—retelling of David 
Bowie’s Ziggy Stardust years.
In the late 60s Bowie was a cute, pop-idol-wannabe 
Mod performing art songs in the clubs of swinging 
London. Stanley Kubrick’s movie masterpiece 2001 
A Space Odyssey came out in 1968, and Bowie 
retaliated with the 1969 hit song Space Oddity, 
nicely tied in with the first moon landing. On tour, 
his mime act in a dress didn’t go over well at rock 
festivals, so he changed strategy. He dropped his 
ethereal pretensions, embraced hardcore rock ‘n’ 
roll, took advice from Andy Warhol’s Factory gang, 
borrowed some edginess from Kubrick’s 
Clockwork Orange, and blasted off with some really 
excellent songs.
In March 1973, in the culmination of his first North 
American tour to promote The Rise and Fall of 
Ziggy Stardust and The Spiders From Mars, David 
Bowie descended from the gods above the stage at 
Radio City Music Hall riding an enormous silver 
sphere. He wore bespangled pantaloons, a silver 
medallion on his forehead, bright red electrified 
hair, and sang about outer space, the end of the 
world, fame and bisexuality.
No one at the time quite knew what to make of 
Bowie’s Brecht-fest at Tiffany’s, but his influence 
would mark a momentous transition in pop and 
rock. The album Ziggy Stardust never made it onto 
the charts in the States, despite raves in Rolling 
Stone, New Musical Express and every other 
industry rag, yet it is considered to be one of the 
most important rock albums of the era. 
Five Years, Rock ‘n’ Roll Suicide, Lady Stardust, 
Suffragette City, etc. chronicled a self-obsessed 
rock star who wavered between saving the world 
and saving himself.cThis was sexy, intelligent 
parody, even self-mockery. And Bowie had the 
talent to keep’em hooked.
Velvet Goldmine is the title of a Bowie song 
thatdidn’t make it onto the Ziggy Stardust album. 
The film borrows it’s structural framework from 
Citizen Kane. In 1984, a reporter (Christian Bale) is 
asked by his newspaper to investigate what has 
happened to former glamrocker Brian Slade 
(Jonathan Rhys-Meyer) on the tenth anniversary of 
the pop star’s hoax assassination while in concert. 
The audience follows Bale as he wades through 
interviews with key players in Slade’s life, 
flashbacks that bounce around like a pinball, overly 
long faux music videos, musical parodies of Bowie 
by a group called The Venus in Furs and constant, 
irritating references to Oscar Wilde. The characters 
posture like crazy. This might be interesting if 
accompanied by some psychological insights, or 
some original wit. Lacking these, the swanning 
dandyism soon besomes dull.
The story is partly Bale’s voyage of self-discovery 
as he relives the burgeoning homosexuality of his 
adolescence. Ten years later he still doesn’t seem to 
have resolved this issue, and it’s enough to make 
you want to slap him and tell him to grow up. The 
end of Velvet Goldmine is untidy; you’re not really 
sure what happened to Slade, and you’re not really 
sure you care.
Bowie was asked by the film’s producers for 
soundtrack rights to The Rise and Fall of Ziggy 
Stardust and the Spiders From Mars, but he said no. 
He refused to have anything to do with the movie. 
It’s not hard to see why. Though Velvet Goldmine 
is fantastic eye candy, which is why it got an award 
for Artistic Contribution at Cannes and shared an 
Oscar for costumes, it ain’t rock ‘n’ roll. Rhys-
Meyer’s pouty, curvaceous Bowie figure lacks the 
razor-sharp charisma that makes people into rock 
stars. Toni Collette is wonderful as his neurotic 
estranged wife. As Iggy Pop, Ewan McGregor is 
great, although he looks spookily like Kurt Cobain. 
Other than the central character, the cast is very 
good considering they have little to work with.
Director Todd Haynes is known for movies heavy 
on symbolism, low on story, such as Safe and 
Poison. The bloated, later films of a once sleek and 
brilliant Ken Russell come to mind. That’s really 
the big problem with Velvet Goldmine. How did 
Haynes manage to do a bloated movie about a 
subject as sleek and brilliant as Bowie and the 
zeitgeist he created?
Velvet Goldmine makes the whole Ziggy/glamrock 
scene look silly, superficial, self-involved and 
pointless, which to a large extent it was. But it was 
also a daring, exciting moment in pop culture, a 
moment with enough oomph to make Bowie the 
most influential artist in British pop music over the 
last thirty years. Director Haynes has failed to 
capture the era’s fascination. That’s a drawback of 
making style your main character instead of using it 
as the setting.
Originally published on the online zine, U

© Guy Babineau 2003-2004
< home