HOME

HUMOUR

HEALTH

ARCHIVE

E-MAIL

CORPORATE MAFIA

Corporations have no conscience: they only have a bottom line. Corporate policy is based on profit: if it pays, it gets the go-ahead. Society is increasingly controlled by international conglomerates and with more and more gigantic mergers taking place this means more and more power is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands. This in turn has a negative effect on news media: huge corporations own all major media and the news is increasingly managed to suit the corporate owners. One of the biggest mergers took place recently when AOL joined Time-Warner, but other corporate mergers include Disney Corporation owning the American Broadcast Corporation (ABC) and General Electric owning the National Broadcast Corporation (NBC).

The news is doctored to an extent few people recognize. When military corporations and governments work together, the news is particularly manipulated and biased. You only have to look at US foreign policy. Cuba and Iraq are vilified and subjected to economic strangulation with sanctions, while China gets preferential trade status. The public has a very short memory, but the now demonized Saddam Hussein during the Reagan administration was supported by the US. Washington hoped Iraq's war against Iran would get rid of Ayatollah Khomeini. When Iraqi fighter planes bombed the US warship the Stark and 38 American sailors died, Reagan said it was an honest mistake! Today such an act would result in major military retaliation.

US support for Hussein ended when he failed to win the war against Iran and Khomeini retained his iron grip on that country. Similarly as long as former Panamanian dictator Manuel Noriega helped the US in its ignominious support of the so-called contras in Nicaragua, he was supported by the US despite his drug dealings. There is even a photo of former CIA director (1976-77) and later US president (1989-1993) George Bush Sr. sitting on the same sofa with Noriega having a cordial chat. In 1989 the same Bush sent in US military forces to capture Noriega just before Christmas. Noriega is currently serving a long prison sentence in the US having outlived his usefulness to the US.

How far will big business go to make a profit at the expense of public safety? Here are some examples:

1. In Belgium crankcase oil spiked with dioxin was mixed with cattle feed in the late nineties to reduce costs. The risk of the dioxin subsequently getting into meat and milk products (including chocolates) resulted in an international import ban. For the sake of saving money on cattle feed and thus increase profits, public health was severely compromised.

2. A common practice in many parts of the industrialized world is to grind diseased cadavers into a so-called protein supplement and feed this carnivorous mix to plant-based animals such as cattle. This can lead first to Mad Cow Disease (see: OUR FATAL FOOD in this issue) and subsequently to Creutzfeldt-Jakob's disease in human beings which destroys the brain and is 100 per cent fatal. To this day mixing animal parts with other cattle feed continues and poses a critical risk to the health of consumers.

3. Some manufacturers use rayon in feminine hygiene tampons which some studies suggest extends the period of bleeding (thus boosting tampon sales) and are suspected to cause cervical cancer, particularly when combined with another carcinogen: asbestos fibers. Rayon is a synthetic fiber made from wood pulp. The risk to a woman's health is magnified by the fact that these fibers are commonly subjected to a bleaching process which creates dioxin, a potent and cumulative carcinogen. In a lifetime a woman uses about 11,400 tampons. Unbleached cotton tampons are made, but are not widely available. For more tampon information visit the Period Conspiracy web site: http://cooties.punkrock.net/tpc/tpc.html

4. A major study published in the prestigious British medical journal The Lancet shows that the massive mammography programs promoted in Canada and the US produce six cases of breast cancer for every one breast cancer death that is avoided. Yet the lucrative x-ray business continues to promote mammograms, despite the fact that study after study has shown that mammography screening of pre-menopausal women has not reduced the breast cancer mortality rate. For post-menopausal women the results are only marginally better while radiation-induced cancer remains a serious risk.

5. Mercury is a dangerous neurotoxin which attacks the nervous system, yet it is widely used. E.g. in the form of amalgam for dental fillings and as a preservative in vaccines in the form of thimerosal. In the US even the ultraconservative Food and Drug Administration (FDA) has admitted that children are exposed to unsafe levels of mercury through vaccines containing thimerosal. It is now widely believed that such vaccines cause autism in children--a condition that has reached epidemic proportions in the US and Canada. At no time in US history have American children been so massively exposed to mercury through vaccinations. Most children now get at least 18 vaccine injections before the age of six! Other dangerous toxins that are present in some vaccines include: aluminum and formaldehyde. The pharmaceutical industry continues to produce these vaccines, because it is very profitable to supply the vaccines to the huge immunization industry.

Top executives in industry see their accountability limited to the shareholders and when they must choose between corporate profits and consumer interests, they invariably choose the former over the latter. Corporations show an incredible resilience when exposed as unconsciable entities. The best example is the tobacco industry which still promotes their lethal wares despite massive lawsuits.

How do corporations stay in business despite image damage and major lawsuits? They rely on:

The Ten Commandments of corporate fudging:

1. DENY a problem even exists.

2. MINIMIZE the risks and emphasize the benefits. Try to confuse the public with terms such as "acceptable levels" and "genetic susceptibility."

3. DISTRACT public attention by focussing on other issues.

4. STALL for time by demanding more studies (an old ploy of the tobacco industry).

5. JUSTIFY a problem by explaining that everything in life involves risks including going to bed.

6. CONCEAL damaging information (both industry and government have kept the public in the dark about critical health risks, e.g. the dangers of radioactivity).

7. BLAME the victim: cancer isn't caused by industry, but by one's genes. The problem isn't the substance: it is a person's susceptibility (A former tactic of the asbestos industry).

8. RETALIATE with your own research to "prove" outside research is wrong in claiming a product is harmful to public health or the environment.

9. UNDERMINE proposed new laws by persuading politicians to weaken them.

10. THREATEN to relocate a plant elsewhere and lay off all employees if regulations are not softened. Whatever you can't produce and sell at home, produce and sell abroad.

If a serious problem can no longer be denied, corporations often try to take part of the credit for turning things around with major public relations campaigns showing how hard they work to make this a better world (remember the cleanup pictures following the Exxon Valdez oil disaster or Dow Chemical's TV commercials showing how the company makes good things happen--after the breast implants fiasco?).
Charges that industry is producing carcinogens are always strenuously denied and strongly opposed by the companies involved regardless whether the products are pesticides, plastics or ....even brassieres.
When the book Dressed to Kill: The Link Between Breast Cancer and Bras was published the response of the lingerie business was massive. The bra industry threatened a lawsuit against the Spanish magazine Ella if it dared run a story on the researchers' findings. The threat worked. The story was not published. Meanwhile the New York-based Intimate Apparel Council denied any connection between bras and breast cancer.

If someone dares to expose carcinogenic contamination from within the workplace, the consequences can be deadly. For example, Karen Silkwood had documents which purportedly showed the Kerr-McGee Nuclear Corporation in Crescent, Oklahoma had falsified reports about radioactive levels at the plant where she worked as a technician. She also claimed that 40 pounds of plutonium were missing. On November 13, 1974 she was to hand the documents over to a New York Times reporter. On her way to the meeting the car she was driving ran off the road and she died. The official version was that she fell asleep behind the wheel, but others believe she was deliberately run off the road by someone in another vehicle. The documents were missing and have never been found. Her apartment was so radioactive, it took three months to decontaminate it. Her plutonium-contaminated clothes had to be disposed of in a nuclear waste dump! Her estate launched a civil suit against Kerr-McGee. Twelve years after her death an out-of-court settlement was reached for $1.3 million. The Kerr-McGee plant was closed in 1975.

In conclusion it is worth noting that 24 independent US scientists--including Dr. Samuel Epstein--have stated that the American Cancer Society (ACS) is "doing virtually nothing to help reduce public exposure to cancer-causing chemicals" (Dr. Ralph Moss: The Cancer Industry, pp. 352). For example, when the FDA suggested a printed notice should accompany Premarin and other hormone-containing drugs to warn women these drugs may increase their risk of cancer, the ACS opposed the proposal on the grounds that this would "interfere with the practice of medicine" and "discourage patients" from taking such drugs (ibid.: 352).

The US is the world's biggest exporter of carcinogens. It exports tobacco to countries all over the world and sells chemicals, pesticides and food additives (many of which are now banned in the US) to mostly Third World nations.

Some companies play both sides of the fence. For example, Zeneca produces tamoxifen to treat breast cancer, but the corporation also produces pesticides which the company describes euphemistically as "crop protection products."

There is indeed a conspiracy to withhold or distort information. The three key players are: the government, industry and the major news media. It is very much like trying to figure where the pea is in the classic shell game. See the pea as the facts and the con artists as government, industry and the news media. Add to the mix the multi-billion advertising industry, and it is little wonder that the public is at best confused and at worst pacified.

To end on a positive and empowering note: all relevant information, while not easy to find, is nevertheless available. It just takes time to do your own research, but (if you will pardon the cliche) the life you save may be your own.

HOME