More than just a pretty face....
and other observations on school libraries and teacher-librarianship
School Libraries in Canada, Vol. 8, No. 3, Spring 1988, pp. 5-6.

What do you need?


Let us consider what it is like to visit a book store with a voucher from the school.

"Now there's an attractive book - by a well known author.  Oh we have several other books by that author and they are all very popular with the children.  Oh, look at the illustrations, aren’t they charming, the quality paper and the exceptional binding.  And its only $14.95!"

And another dud hits the shelf!  Another statistic for the school.

"Our library prides itself on the fine collection it has assembled for the students.  The librarian reports that there are now 8567 items!  All selected for our students!."

And the dust settles on the dud, as it waits quietly until someone decides that it really wasn’t any good.  That will be after a long period during which many students may actually have been forced to look at it.

We could choose materials for our school libraries according to the way we were taught to do so in Library School.  Selection is that process in which we analysis the needs of our client group and after consulting the appropriate sources - reviews, major bibliographic sources, etc.- and relating that information to the materials that we already hold in our particular collection, we search for new materials when we discover that our needs cannot be satisfied by the collection.  In very simple terms, we are to buy what we need!  And we are only to buy what is good, but then that would be obvious if we are using public money to support the needs of our kids.  That is not the way in which we actually choose things for our school libraries.  I am sure that there are areas we attempt to cover when the need is ripe, but we actually resent intrusions (like new curricula concerns) into our already well established need patterns.

I can hear the knashing of teeth and the sharpening of spears from here.

We just don't buy materials the way they said we must at Library School.  You and I know that the reality of the situation is quite different.  The publishers are very aware (and probably not surprised) that we don't work that way.  We buy materials for our libraries on the basis of perceived need and "perfect luck".  We buy materials for our libraries (out of the best of intentions) that we discover rather than actually seek.  We do not really care much about reviews especially when we do much of our buying without reference to them, before the reviews are available.  We probably buy most of our materials from their covers, just as most of our clients probably choose books by their covers. 

Just look at the evidence.  School Library Journal has over 40,000 subscribers.  The publishers spend thousands of dollars each year advertising their new books (with pictures of the covers).  They would not do that if they did not find that sales of those materials (long before they are reviewed) did not justify the expense.  In fact, I would not be surprised if those publishers are less excited about reviews than we appear to be.  Oh I am sure that when a book gets a favorable review that will affect its sales.  But please consider all those books that never appear in reviews that somehow find their way to our shelves.  Those good reviews may actually help a title make it into a major bibliographic tool where it will be used to build those new libraries for new kids.  Strange isn’t it that we would fill up a library with old stuff for the new school.  Tried and true and dull.  Just who wants the stuff in the Wilson Catalogs? Who called The Elementary School Library Collection that name?

I don't think that we buy very much that we actively seek out.  It is just too much work. So we accept that which comes across our consciousness and that is where luck comes into the quotient.  When you really think about it there is no other way.  You have money to spend (this year) provided by a budget that for most schools is struck , not on the basis of what is needed, but on what the library had last year.  Or it might have been determined after all the other real needs of the school have been met.  So we money to spend on materials for our libraries and we have to spend or lose it.  We do know what the kids need don't we! And so do the publishers!  Who drives this vehicle?  Who decides what we shall read? Who leads and who pushes?

It is very difficult to choose materials for a school library.  To properly do the job, the school librarian has to be fully aware of every curriculum thrust in the school, every teacher's teaching style, every kid's reading level, every item in the existing collection. It is hopeless to pretend that it could be done.

That hopeless mandate becomes compounded with the realities of that marketplace.  The relentless flow of new material in all its technological splendor confounds any attempt to change the pattern.  We have to buy because we have to buy.  Consider what it is like to take a year off.  Think of all the wonderful things that will go by.  What a shame. 

The real shame is that we cannot do more than we are doing.  We have to give all we can to the collection-selection process we have designed for ourselves.  We have to acknowledge that what we are doing is not a perfect process.  We have to consider more what it is that we are going to do with this stuff that we buy along with all the other stuff we bought.  Buy what you need.    What is it that you want to change with this stuff?  What do you need?

Donald Hamilton