The text below is designed
to fit on a single page printed on both sides and is an effective
and concise leaflet exposing the deceptive information produced
by the Cancer Establishment:
cancer hucksters & hoaxers don't tell you
WHAT TO BELIEVE? CONSIDER THE FACTS!
By John J. Moelaert author
of The Cancer Conspiracy. TEL: (250) 472-0061 Postal address:
102-2500 Florence Lake Rd. Victoria, BC, Canada V9B 4H2
Web: http://members.shaw.ca/cancerconspiracy E-Mail: firstname.lastname@example.org
The so-called war against cancer
is the biggest hoax ever perpetrated on a gullible public. It
is easy to prove: If the billions of dollars spent on cancer
research during the past 50 years had been effective and if all
the alleged medical breakthroughs had been true, obviously fewer
and fewer people would get and die of cancer instead of more
and more--far beyond population growth. But instead of the long-promised
cancer cure we now have a cancer epidemic. Why? Because cancer
is not only a terrible disease spreading in our midst, it is
also a multi-billion dollar industry. The countless millions
of dollars donated by well-meaning but misled people for research
is little more than an employment/profit scheme. An effective
form of cancer prevention would have devastating economic consequences
for the cancer industry. Hence the emphasis is not on cancer
prevention, but on treatment and diagnostic procedures, because
that is where the big money is. Ridding the world of cancer would
be as welcome among cancer profiteers as a shark in a swimming
1. Most people (about 65 per
cent according to Statistics Canada--Year 2000 figures) who get
cancer--excluding skin cancer--die of it: clearly not much of
a success rate!
2. Mammography is not a safe procedure. It doesn't
prevent breast cancer, it doesn't cure it and it often fails
to detect it, but it can cause it! According to
a study published in the prestigious British medical journal
The Lancet (January 8, 2000) "the data show that
for every 1000 women screened biennially throughout 12 years,
one breast-cancer death is avoided whereas the total number of
deaths is increased by six." In other words mammography
screening causes more cancers than it prevents
breast cancer deaths.
3. Mammography produces at least 15 per cent false negatives
and has not reduced breast cancer mortality in pre-menopausal
women. (Cancer: The Misguided Cell --Dr. David Prescott
and Dr.Abraham Flexer)
4. Breast cancer has more than doubled from one in 20 during
the early seventies to one in 8 today. The mortality rate has
remained virtually unchanged at around 30 per cent while the
incidence of breast cancer continues to increase about two per
cent per year.
5. The effects of cancer treatment are often worse than the disease
itself and frequently hasten death rather than prevent it. A
33-year study by the late Dr. Hardin Jones, Professor of Medical
Physics University of California, found that "untreated
cancer victims live up to four times longer than treated individuals."
(The Betrayal of Health by Dr. Joseph Beasley) Another
study shows that lung cancer patients who undergo radiation therapy
have a 20 per cent higher mortality rate than non-radiated ones
(The Lancet, Summer 1998).
6. There is no medical or ethical justification for subjecting
terminal cancer patients to immune-depressing radiation and chemotherapy.
A McGill University study showed that most doctors would reject
these therapies if they or members of their family had terminal
7. Cancer misdiagnosis is not rare and its victims may be treated
for and "cured" of a cancer they never had in the first
8. Various forms of chemotherapy used to treat one form of cancer
produces another, e.g. tamoxifen used to treat breast cancer
can cause uterine cancer.
9. According to the World Health Organization at least 80 per
cent of all cancer is environmentally caused and can therefore
be prevented. But prevention is largely ignored by the cancer
establishment in favour of treatment which fails most of the
time, but unlike prevention is very profitable.
10. The cancer establishment--which enjoys strong corporate support--never
criticizes industry for spiking our food, water, air, soil and
even some medicines with carcinogens. Instead it blames cancer
victims for their lifestyles and being genetically predisposed
to the disease.
11. A cancer patient who is subjected to both chemotherapy and
radiation risks getting secondary tumours 25 times the normal
rate (The Cancer Industry by Ralph Moss, PhD.)
12. Early diagnosis doesn't necessarily mean a better chance
of survival, but it does mean a better chance to be included
in the five-year-survival group. Cancer is the only disease that
uses the term five-year-survival instead of cure.
A person who lives five years following cancer diagnosis and
dies a month later shows up in cancer statistics as cured. This
is moving the goal posts to make cancer statistics look better
than they are --a profitable ploy for fundraising!
Millions of people keep donating to the cancer establishment
without having a clue what exactly happens to the money. Public
ignorance about the politics of cancer is the result of widespread
distortion and suppression of relevant facts by the cancer industry,
government, and most mainstream news media. In the meantime
an average of 184 Canadians and some 1,600 Americans die of cancer
every day: most of them needlessly. The global cancer
death toll is between six and seven million people per year.