 |
| |
ENTRY # : |
32 |
| |
TITLE : |
PERCHANCE TO SCREAM NO MORE |
| |
ARC : |
N/A |
| |
ENTERED BY : |
Coast City Municipal Court Records |
| |
DATE RANGE : |
January 27-28th, 2001 |
| |
HEROES : |
|
| |
VILLAINS : |
|
| |
PEOPLE : |
Victor Stewart,
Justice Anthony M. Kennedy,
District Attorney Gil Grant,
Defense Attorney Leland McKenzie,
Franklin Adams,
Dr. Peter Benton,
Crucible,
Harvey Fain,
Dr. Mark Green,
Cpl. Jimmy Hughes,
Eugene Kilgore,
Warden Fred Norman,
Dr. Brakish Okun,
Lt. Trey Parker,
Doug Roth,
Lawrence Schexnayder,
Dr. Brian Sexsmith,
Philip Spector,
Wolfgang Valentino
|
| |
OTHERS : |
Municipal Courthouse,
Wailing Willy,
Pinging Pete,
Voxbox Vicky,
Coast City Courier,
Sacred Heart Hospital,
Sirenos Inc.,
Stronghold,
The Knights of the Coast,
The Hero Collective,
The Super Squad,
The Injustice Gang,
The New Injustice Gang
|
|
| |
ENTRY : |
SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA IN AND FOR THE COUNTY OF COAST CITY
Date: January 28th, 2001
Department 103
Hon. Anthony M. Kennedy, Judge
Phil McCracken, Deputy Clerk
People v. Victor Stewart
Case # BA097211
THE PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA,
PLAINTIFF,
VS.
VICTOR STEWART,
AKA THE SCREAMING SKULL,
DEFENDANT.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
APPEARANCES:
- FOR THE PEOPLE:
- GIL GRANT; Deputy District Attorney
- FOR THE DEFENDANT:
- LELAND McKENZIE; Privately Retained Counsel
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
OPENING REMARKS:
- GIL GRANT, PROSECUTOR:
- The Assistant District Attorney opened the case with a blueprint of how the trial
was going to transpire. The Charges were; Violation of Parole,
Escaping Lawful Custody (two counts), and Conspiracy in the
Break-Out from Stronghold. The case would be straightforward; the Evidence
would show that Victor Stewart did in fact knowingly and willingly do the
deeds that the charges stemmed from. The Defense would try to muddy the waters
and discredit the witnesses to generate reasonable doubt. He urged the Jury
and Judge to ignore these attemtps and look at the hard cold facts that
proved that Victor Stewart had in fact committed the crimes.
- Private Notes, G. Grant: "The comment about the Defense was an
attempt to "poison the well" against them to help make up for the weakness
in the case."
- LELAND McKENZIE, DEFENSE:
- Mr. McKenzie took a strongly offensive tack in his opening remarks,
walking the line of possible ethics violations by inferring that
the DA was prosecuting this case to gain capital upon the notoriety
of Dr. Stewart (particularly with the close coincidence in timing
to Dr. Stewart's book launch) for a future political career. He then
went on to cast aspersions upon the efficiency and purity of the police
force, that they would press a trial upon non-existent evidence, and
offered to do the police's job for them by demonstrating who was truly
behind the Stronghold break-out.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WITNESSES FOR THE PROSECUTION:
- EUGENE KILGORE; Hardware Technician, SIRENOS INC.
- TESTIMONY: Kilgore testified that Professor Stewart's work meant
everything to him. Dr. Stewart was a secretive sort who didn't explain what he
was doing to Eugene, and worked on a lot of things behind closed doors.
- REBUTTAL: Mr. Kilgore had no physics background, therefore would not have made
a good sounding board for Dr. Stewart. Dr. Stewart was eccentric in his work
habits, but very brilliant.
- PHIL SPECTOR; Victor Stewart's Lab Assistant, SIRENOS INC.
- TESTIMONY: Victor had a very obsessive and oft-times secretive nature.
He would work odd hours, often alone, and at time would bar Phil from viewing
certain experiments claiming a concern to protect Phil's health. CIPHER was
often in the lab with Victor.
- REBUTTAL: Victor's actions were not especially atypical for a brilliant
scientist, in Phil's experience. Once appraised of the
cellular damage that accompanied prolonged exposure to
Stewart's sonic technology, he agreed that barring Phil from certain experiments
was both logical and in-character. Victor had claimed to be working alone the night
of the break-in, and this claim was also not extraordinary for the man. Victor had
a particular paranoia about the "untrustworthy" security arrangements at the
lab, and worked primarily from hard-copy.
- DR. BRIAN SEXSMITH; Criminal Psychologist
- TESTIMONY: Based upon an examination of Stewart's previous criminal record and
the obsessive personality evident within his book, Mr. Sexsmith felt it was unlikely
that Stewart had truly reformed. The nature of the plots
hatched by THE NEW INJUSTICE GANG recently was completely in character for the
SCREAMING SKULL, and in fact bore his fingerprints, including misdirection. A
frame-by-frame analysis of the video showing the snatching
of Victor from the Crucible memorial ceremony showed no sign that Victor was alarmed
or surprised by what was taking place, and in fact caught him reaching for "what
might have been a weapon in his vest pocket".
- REBUTTAL: Mr. Sexsmith could not account for the lack of a "calling card" in the
plot, but hypothesized that the use of the sonic cannon to facilitate the break-in
was that calling card. Otherwise, the lack of a gadget might have been caused by
Victor's apprehension; he had no opportunity to use gadgets because of the time
lost in the custody of the police. Mr. Sexsmith did admit that the mere presence
of an elaborate plan was not conclusive proof of the Screaming Skull's involvement;
other villains commonly used such plots. The length of time covered in the video
was such that the lack of reaction wasn't overly exceptional.
- Private Notes, L. McKenzie: "I really botched my cross-examination of this
witness. Not only did I fail to challenge the basis for Sexsmith's 'analysis' of Mr.
Stewart (which could only have come from old written records) or even ask him where a
man fresh from police custody could have obtained a weapon, I didn't grill him hard
enough on what "fingerprints" he saw in the plot. In my defense I must admit to having
been quite taken aback by the gall involved in claiming that "misdirection" was a
common SKULL ploy. Either Mr. Sexsmith was lying to the court or he is incompetant;
there are no two ways around this. The classic SKULL pattern was always a
bluff, straightforward attack lacking in guile (though not in elaboracy or brilliance).
If the SKULL plotted something, such was perfectly clear in hindsight. There would
have been no question of responsibility had Victor truly been behind the Stronghold
break-in; we would have known of his involvement. I also didn't catch at the
time that he was trying to have his cake and eat it too. One the one hand, he made it
sound as if Victor anticipated everything that happened, yet on the other he explained
away the lack of a calling card device as being due to an unanticipated stay in police
custody. Luckily these lapses had no effect on the outcome of this particular charge."
- FRANKLIN ADAMS; Structural Engineer and Material Scientist
- TESTIMONY: Mr. Adams is a structural engineer specializing in sonic and
vibrationary-induced damage. He is familiar with the 'signature' of the Screaming
Skull's repetoire of devices. He testified that the residue from the break in
bore the characteristic traces of sonic weaponry similar to that employed by
the Screaming Skull.
- REBUTTAL: Mr Adams could not rule out the possibility that someone else
was using technology similar to that employed by the Skull 20 years before. He
could not rule out the possibility that someone was using one of the Skull's old
devices created prior to his last incarceration. Analysis of the Wailing Willy-like
device captured from the 'SONIC SKULL' demonstrated that it worked along similar
principles and would create similar traces.
- CAPTAIN STRONG; Retired Superhero, Former Member of the SUPER SQUAD
- TESTIMONY: CAPTAIN STRONG's testimony was a rambling, disjointed affair
which really went nowhere.
- REBUTTAL: No cross-examination performed.
- Private Notes, L. McKenzie: "Someone apparently forgot to give
CAPTAIN STRONG his meds that morning."
- THE GOLDEN AVENGER; Retired Superhero, Former Member of the SUPER SQUAD
- TESTIMONY: Had tangled with the SCREAMING SKULL many times in the past, and been
held hostage by him on more than one occasion. Attested that the SCREAMING SKULL was
fond of complicated plots.
- REBUTTAL: Admitted that the SCREAMING SKULL was not the only one to use
elaborate plots, and brought up LUDWIG VALENTINO as another example. Admitted that
one knew it when the SCREAMING SKULL unleashed a plan; there was no guessing required
as to the originator.
- SUB-ZERO; Superhero, Member of the KNIGHTS OF THE COAST
- TESTIMONY: Although SUB-ZERO had been on leave from the KNIGHTS during much of
Victor's sojourn with them, he could testify that Victor had provided many gadgets to
them. Indicated that the use of the gadget at the time of the
Injustice for All affair had led the group into
an ambush. Further testified that use of
previous gadgets had also led the group into
ambushes.
Attested that many of the group had fallen under the sway of Dr. Stewart, particularly
CRUCIBLE and CIPHER, and that CIPHER had let him escape the group's base of operations
(as per the second charge of escaping custody).
- REBUTTAL: In the cross-examination, SUB-ZERO provided more detail about the
ambush at the oil rig. The group had appeared at the site
of the enemy base and had a brief period of parlaying before coming under assault.
It no longer sounded so much like an 'ambush'. Likewise, SUB-ZERO admitted that
sheer incompetance likely had as much to do with previous 'ambushes' as did the
devices provided. Finally admitted that the final vanquishing of THE NEW
INJUSTICE GANG was greatly facilitated by the use of Pinging Pete, Mk II.
- HAZARDMAN; Superhero, Member of the KNIGHTS OF THE COAST
- TESTIMONY: Also testified that many of Victor's gadgets either failed or else
led the group into trouble. His testimony about Victor's escape from the KNIGHTS base
would indicate either that he manipulated CIPHER to enable it to pass (he certainly
manipulated her into fetching him sonic weapons that he had heretofore created at
Sirenos) or possibly even attacked her in order to escape.
- REBUTTAL: Further inquiry into the problems associated with Victor's devices
again showed that the failure was in the way they were used, rather than the
devices themselves. He also testified that the group's ability to track THE NEW
INJUSTICE GANG to their base depended upon Victor's gadgets. He was steadfast that
Victor Stewart was still worthy of a trusted position among the KNIGHTS.
- PHOENIX; Superhero, Leader of the KNIGHTS OF THE COAST
- TESTIMONY: Testified that he had been attacked by the SCREAMING SKULL using
sonic weapons on multiple occasions during the
Injustice for All affair. Further testified
that many of the KNIGHTS - himself included - had come under the influence of Victor's
personality during their association.
- REBUTTAL: Under pointed questioning, was forced to admit that he came under the
attack of someone dressed as the SCREAMING SKULL, rather than someone he could
positively identify as Victor. He maintained that he had no reason to believe that it
was anyone other than Victor, despite the spotting of a second individual dressed to
resemble him on Jan 8th, or the capture of that individual - the 'SONIC SKULL' - on
Jan 9th in full kit and wielding devices similar to those used by the SCREAMING SKULL.
Could attest to no mental or charismatic superpowers possessed by Dr. Stewart, just
an engaging personality.
- Private Notes, L. McKenzie: "Mr Grant attempted some extremely dirty
pool here by springing upon the trial a letter from Trey Parker into evidence as if
PHOENIX could answer questions regarding that letter, only to reveal on
cross-examination that he could not do so. Whether or not it was eventually tossed
out, this 'exhibit' prejudiced the jury towards accepting the hypothesis that Dr.
Stewart was some sort of mesmerizing whiz, which may have contributed to the one
conviction for escaping custody. I'm still not sure how that whole PHOENIX/TRIBUNAL
business works."
- DIAMOND LIL; Supervillain, Member of THE NEW INJUSTICE GANG
- TESTIMONY: Testified that during the two-week period that she was with THE NEW
INJUSTICE GANG, she heard numerous allusions to indicate that the SCREAMING SKULL was
playing an active role in the group.
- REBUTTAL: Victor was in jail for more than half of her tenure with the group,
yet nothing she heard would indicate that their mastermind was locked up or in any
other way out of commission. She also never saw the man.
- PROFESSOR VON ZOOM; Supervillain, Member of THE NEW INJUSTICE GANG
- TESTIMONY: The type of master plan the villains attempted to carry out was just
like old times in the original INJUSTICE GANG, when it was jointly led by WOLFGANG
VALENTINO and the SCREAMING SKULL. He would put nothing past the depths of Dr.
Stewart's brilliance.
- REBUTTAL: Von Zoom had been locked up in Stronghold until the time of the
breakout, and could not attest to any involvement of Dr. Stewart in the planning
behind that mission. Thereafter, although he was told at many occasions that
"things were going according to the SCREAMING SKULL's plan", he never actually
spoke to his old comrade, though he was told after the abduction that Stewart was being
held "for his own protection".
- Private Notes, L. McKenzie: "I could probably have pried more with this
witness into the actual abduction itself, but frankly I didn't trust him. Regardless
that he may have been friends with Victor in the past, I wouldn't put it past him to
lie on the stand now to get revenge on a man who turned his back on his former
comrades. As it was, I'm not convinced that his talk of the Skull's 'Masterplan'
wasn't part of such an attempt. We didn't need further testimony into that escape
anyway, as that charge was a complete joke."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
WITNESSES FOR THE DEFENSE:
- DR. BRAKISH OKUN; Psychologist, STRONGHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
- TESTIMONY: Dr. Okun had been assigned to Victor's case for the past four years,
and had had extensive contact with him. He recommended Victor for parole having
spotted a change in Victor's opinions of the superhero trade, possibly spurred on
by the effect of the business upon Stewart's health. Dr. Okun expressed the opinion
that Victor was at last ready to put costumed adventuring behind him and become a
productive member of society. In contrast with Dr. Sexsmith, Dr. Okun saw no
particular fingerprints of Dr. Stewart in the Injustice
for All affair, and rather saw the lack of a new and elaborate sonic device
as a glaring omission from the SKULL's previous M.O. He was of the opinion that
Dr. Stewart now saw the patents he was responsible for as his ticket to immortality,
rather than the ephemeral fame of a minor supervillain.
- REBUTTAL: Dr. Okun admitted that he spent more time with Victor than he did with
most of his cases, and had developed a personal liking for the man, although he
insisted that this did not affect his professional evaluation of Victor.
- FRED NORMAN; Warden, STRONGHOLD CORRECTIONAL FACILITY
- TESTIMONY: Mr. Norman had agreed with the committee that judged Dr. Stewart
fit to be paroled. Also testified that Dr. Stewart had had no access to those
regions of Stronghold targeted during the breakout, and would have had no knowledge
of the layout in those areas.
- REBUTTAL: Also admitted to having developed a personal friendship with Victor
and to have "pulled a few strings" on his behalf after his release. Although
he too denied that the friendship affected his judgement in having recommended Victor's
release, he could not deny the possbility that it might have done so on a subconscious
level.
- DOUG ROTH; Reporter, COAST CITY COURIER
- TESTIMONY: Had interviewed both
Dr. Stewart and Harvey Fain shortly after Dr. Stewart's release from Stronghold.
He considers himself a good judge of character, and believed Victor's claims to have
changed his ways. Also testified as to Mr. Fain's strong views about the possibility
of supervillain rehabilitation and that Mr. Fain seemed obsessed with taking Victor
down.
- REBUTTAL: Doug Roth had only met Victor for a few hours on a single
occasion, and was not infallible in his judgement of character.
- LAWRENCE SCHEXNAYDER; President, SIRENOS INC.
- TESTIMONY: Oversaw Dr. Stewart's role at Sirenos Inc. Saw no indications
to indicate that Dr. Stewart was in communication with any villainous organization.
Had the utmost faith in the man who was already responsible for having developed
five patents for Sirenos.
- REBUTTAL: Mr. Schexnayder's expression of faith in Stewart was not without
a healthy serving of self-interest considering the profits to be made from the
eccentric researcher. Schexnayder - in many ways - seemed to be exploiting
Stewart.
- REDIRECT: Mr. Schexnayder had no indication that Stewart was unsatisfied
with his contract, and would be amenable if Stewart wanted to renegotiate for better
terms. None of his other employees needed to resort to supervillainy in order to
make ends meet.
- CPL. JAMES HUGHES; Police Officer, CCPD.
- TESTIMONY: Jimmy Hughes was the officer on record for having arrested
Victor Stewart on Dec. 23rd. He attested to the strong
precautions and planning that went into planning the arrest of a known supervillain,
and the length of time it required to get access to the labs to make the arrest.
Admitted that if Stewart had taken measures to detect their approach, that he would
have had time to grab a nearby device or make a break for it. Instead, Victor went
surprisingly quietly, and required medication from the shock. Also, the
arrest had been strongly driven by Mr. Fain, and Jimmy had not been shown any of
the evidence to suggest Stewart's guilt.
- REBUTTAL: Although mildly surprising, Stewart's ease of capture and the
calm way that he continued his work routine after the Stronghold breakout were not
exceptional, and by no means proof of his innocence. Hughes' lack of access to
information regarding Stewart's guilt was also not extraordinary.
- Private Notes, L. McKenzie: "If ever I have seen a case of the cops being
provided ahead of time with blank warrants, this was one of them. There is no way
that Stewart's arrest should have been approved given the lack of physical evidence
or even the most basic questioning of the suspect. Furthermore Fain et al. lied
to the judge during the bail hearings about the amount of evidence they had in order
to get him denied bail. The department had it in for Stewart; it's as simple as
that."
- DR. MARK GREEN; Attending Physician, SACRED HEART HOSPITAL
- TESTIMONY: Dr. Green performed the in-depth assessment on Victor Stewart when
he was admitted on Jan 8th after being freed from the island
base of THE NEW INJUSTICE GANG. He testified that Victor's condition was consistent
with a prolonged imprisonment/maltreatment (comatose, dehydrated and with manacle
marks).
- REBUTTAL: Dr. Green was not the first to 'handle' Dr. Stewart.
- DR. PETER BENTON; Attending Physician, SACRED HEART HOSPITAL
- TESTIMONY: Dr. Benton took over Dr. Stewart's case upon re-admission on
Jan 9th after the sub battle. At that time, Victor was in
serious condition suffering from wounds characteristic of severe sonic attack;
broken eardrums, concussion, etc. Between that and his chronic cellular condition, he
has been in hospital since this time.
- REBUTTAL: The majority of Victor's wounds were indistinguishable from the type
of blunt trauma caused by other impacts.
- CAPTAIN THUNDER; Superhero, Member of the HERO COLLECTIVE
- TESTIMONY: Witnessed the battle between the SCREAMING
SKULL and the 'SONIC SKULL'. Attested that they were dressed almost identically, and
wielding similar devices. Also testified that although they were nearly evenly
matched, one got the upper hand and started dealing actual sonic wounds to the other,
who was later revealed to be Victor. Kept characterizing Victor as a 'villain', though
could not provide concrete examples of having observed any villainy from him. Ranted
that Victor should never have been released; that the justice system was fundamentally
broken.
- REBUTTAL: No cross-examination performed.
- CITIZEN MERCURY; Superhero, Member of the HERO COLLECTIVE
- TESTIMONY: Attested to conditions under which he
discovered Victor in the island base. Agreed that the setup did not appear
to have been staged.
- REBUTTAL: No cross-examination performed.
- OBERON; Superhero, Member of the KNIGHTS OF THE COAST
- TESTIMONY: Testified regarding Victor's association with the KNIGHTS. Blamed
the failure of Victor's gadgets and the 'ambush' problem on incompetance, rather than
malicious intent. Attested that he had had no reason to doubt Victor at the time that
they triggered Pinging Pete Mk II, and that when they appeared
in the enemy base, there was no indication that the villains were anticipating their
arrival in that manner. Gave credit to Victor's device as helping facilitate the
locating of the base.
- REBUTTAL: : Confirmation that the group was assaulted "almost immediately" after
being transported to the oil derrick. Further reiteration that Victor's devices had
led them into trouble before.
- 'SONIC SKULL'; Supervillain, Member of THE NEW INJUSTICE GANG
- TESTIMONY: This crazed, abusive individual claimed to be the 'one true SCREAMING
SKULL', and to being the person who operated the sonic cannon during the Stronghold
break. Raved on about having been mentored by the former SCREAMING SKULL - though
his claims of having personally been taught his craft by Victor seemed unreliable and
self-indulgent. Stopped short of claiming to possess Victor's organizational and
planning sense, however, and further claimed that the Stronghold break was according
to Victor's plans.
- REBUTTAL: No cross-examination performed.
- HARVEY FAIN; Parole Officer in Charge of Stewart Case
- TESTIMONY: Absolutely maintained Victor's guilt, with never a shred of doubt
on his mind. Claimed to have physical/witness and DNA evidence linking Victor to
the Stronghold break-in, though he could not produce such at this time. When told
an anecdote about a flaming villain robbing an armored car, he went off on a rant
about how he never trusted (the deceased) CRUCIBLE, obviously believing him to be
responsible.
- REBUTTAL: Tried to demonstrate the irrelevancy of Fain's attitude towards
Victor because Fain had not committed the crimes. Fain was not on trial, Victor
Stewart was.
- Private Notes, G. Grant: "Damn the police force and Fain for a weak
investigation; it is sloppiness like this that has people losing confidence in
the legal system and resorting to extreme measures."
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
CLOSING REMARKS:
- GIL GRANT, PROSECUTOR:
- Mr. Grant insisted that the facts were clear; Victor's devices and plans were
essential to the breakout, he escaped lawful custody twice - which the Defense could
not refute - including once with equipment that he had made in clear violation of the
terms of his parole. He argued that both sides of the conflict - both the Villians
and the Heroes - testified that he was involved in aiding and abetting THE NEW
INJUSTICE GANG. He also supplied a motive for Dr. Stewart, citing his obsessive
nature and medical condition urging him on for one last hurrah. He concluded by
dismissing the defense's case as so much "smoke and mirrors" and insisting that there
was no choice but to find Victor guilty and put him back where he would not pose a
danger to public safety.
- LELAND McKENZIE, DEFENSE:
- Mr. McKenzie started off by wondering openly if he was at the right trial.
Certainly, he maintained, the closing arguments presented by the DA seemed based
upon some other trial than the one he had just attended. He then went through the
charges in order, reiterating the lack of any sort of evidence to link the
post-release Victor Stewart to the Stronghold break-in, the lack of any evidence to
suggest that Victor went voluntarily with the attackers of the Crucible Memorial
ceremony or had been in collision with them beforehand, inferred that one of the
KNIGHTS OF THE COAST let him go from the base (or else that Victor was temporarily
deranged by the drugs used to revive him), and downplayed the parole violation
inherent in the creation and use of Voxbox Vicky by insisting that Victor was acting
heroically, rather than criminally in using them to help apprehend known villains.
He again attacked the motives of the police force and maintained that if not for the
corrupted actions of Harvey Fain, this trial would not have taken place.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
RESULT:
- ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, JUDGE:
- Judge Kennedy wasted little time in tossing out the counts of complicity in the
Stronghold break-in and the first count of escaping custody due to lack of evidence.
On the second count of escaping custody, he questioned the length of Victor's
association with the group, and the nature of the police powers remaining to the
members of the Knights (they having lost most official status with the death of
CRUCIBLE and dissociation of TRIBUNAL). He upheld that conviction on the ground
that even if CIPHER let Victor go of her own volition (which he had cause to doubt),
she had no authority to do so and Victor should have been aware of this. In any event,
he blasted the KNIGHTS for first having taken Victor into their own custody, and
thereafter guarding him so poorly. Regardless of their beliefs about Victor's guilt
or innocence, he maintained that in assuming the role of custodian, they had a legal
and moral responsibility to the system, a responsibility they failed both at the
Crucible Memorial and within their base.
On the final count of parole violation, he also found Victor guilty, maintaining that
even if the latter had used Voxbox Vicky against known villains, he had knowingly
and intentionally done so as a rogue vigilante rather than a representative of the law.
The cloak of secrecy under which he created the device also supported the contention
that this was done in violation even of the lenient terms of his parole.
- ON THE COUNT OF CONSPIRACY TO ENGINEER A PRISON BREAK:
- Not Guilty.
- ON THE 1ST COUNT OF ESCAPING CUSTODY (Crucible Memorial):
- Not Guilty.
- ON THE 2ND COUNT OF ESCAPING CUSTODY (KOTC Base):
- Guilty.
- ON THE COUNT OF VIOLATING HIS PAROLE:
- Guilty.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
SENTENCING:
- ANTHONY M. KENNEDY, JUDGE:
- Despite having found Victor guilty on two of the counts against him, in the
sentencing stage of his trial he expressed his greatest contempt for the role
of the police, and in particular Harvey Fain in the matter. He expressed his
opinion that Mr. Stewart's civil rights had been violated by the expeditious
manner of his arrest, and treatment thereafter. He expressed his opinion that
the subsequent criminal acts performed by Victor might have been motivated
by the railroading he had been receiving. Therefore he was imposing an extremely
light sentence, requiring Victor (once his recovery was complete) to report to
Stronghold for 24 hours every Saturday until his original sentence was complete.
|
|
| |
WRAPUP : |
Although Victor was cleared of the most serious crimes, and the resulting
punishment was so mild as to allow his continued assistance to the group, this affair was a
PR debacle for the Knights of the Coast. Evidence of petty bickering between members
of the group, possible criminal violations and admitted incompetance became the fodder for
many news and tabloid stories for weeks to come. Public confidence in them was further shaken
at the insinuations that a known supervillain held them "in thrall", and by the off-the-record
comments made by respected members of the Hero Collective. Criminal activity
increased in the period after the trial which only made confidence slip even further. Victor
remained in serious, but stable condition as of the end of the trial (having been too sick to
participate himself).
|
|