Packaged For Your Convenience
As I learn more about health, medicine,
and diet, I find myself moving away from most already-prepared
foods. It isn’t as hard as I would have thought; I was already
getting direct feedback from my body via a variety of complaints and
mild reactions that some of the things I was eating were not doing
me any good. One side-dish of packaged noodles with sauce, for
example, would send me gasping for water for the rest of the night
until bedtime, when I would feel waterlogged and exhausted.
The thing of it is, I didn’t realize how many prepared-packaged
things had crept into my life. I grew up in a household that
eschewed most pre-fab food – exceptions being made for a couple of
specific Campbell’s soups and a limited repertoire of canned
vegetables. My mother started on a health-food kick when she was
pregnant with me, and it lasted for years. This was the 1970s,
though, and while the prevailing food wisdom of the era encouraged
the reading of labels, we weren’t as vigilant about certain things
as I am today. Some of this is because the current batch of
nastiness – things like High Fructose Corn Syrup or
Glucose/Fructose, as it is listed in Canada – either weren’t
invented yet, or weren’t yet appearing in every single item of
processed food. Some of it is because we now know more about the
effects of certain items on our digestive systems, hearts, blood,
and arteries.
Health-related nutrition is as subject to fashion as it is to
information or scientific discovery, it turns out. Witness the
oat-bran fibre craze in the eighties, the low-fat nineties, or the
cycling resurgence of Atkins and other low-carbohydrate diet
frenzies. Whether the goal is losing weight, lowering cholesterol,
or getting the bowel to move regularly, there are remnants of all of
these once-fashionable programs in much of what makes people nervous
about food today – what to eat, when, and how much. Some programs –
such as Food Combining, which required strict vigilance and a lot of
planning – gained notoriety for resulting in nutritional
deficiencies that led to greater health-problems than they were
supposed to address, not to mention making dining out virtually
impossible.
Despite the existence of a few overly complicated programs such as
Food Combining, most people seek a plan that allows them to make
simple decisions. Eat this, don’t eat that. They don’t want to have
to think, or do research, or learn what works best for them. They
don’t want to know why it works, except in a few easy sentences they
can drop into cocktail chatter to justify whatever they are eating
or shunning, and (martyr-types notwithstanding) they don’t want to
follow a program that requires them to do much work.
Certainly, no one wants to have to perform complicated calculations
before eating a meal, unless they suffer from a Tesla-like
obsessive-compulsive disorder. For a long time, I kept a fairly
vigilant eye on my diet for fats – type and amount – striving to
maximize my use of heart-healthy oils such as olive and canola,
minimize the saturates, and keep the overall levels down to a
reasonable level. This occasionally necessitated certain
calculations in order to ascertain whether a recipe was useable
as-is or would require modifications, and I came to rely on
cookbooks and magazines whose recipes would break down the
components of each dish.
Unfortunately for me, I also came to rely heavily upon fat-related
math from the nutritional panels of prepared and packaged foods –
but I was only really looking at the fat content. During my repeated
convalescences from ulcerative colitis attacks and surgical
complications, I wasn’t strong enough to do much cooking. I couldn’t
do much eating, either, and my weight and strength have fluxuated
wildly while I fought to try and stabilize my health. While sick, I
mostly ate foods that didn’t require much preparation, and I
consoled myself with the fact that at least I wasn’t eating terribly
fatty foods. While it’s true that I was lamentably stick-thin and
frail-looking at the time, and doctors and dieticians alike were
telling me to eat whatever I could keep down, irrespective of its
food value, I knew that cramming fatty foods into a body that was
severely muscle-depleted was not an intelligent move; I was looking
for quality nutrition to get my strength back.
Gradually, I recovered enough of my strength to become functional
again, and return to the kitchen. My cupboards’ contents didn’t
change all that much from when I was still very sick, though; I was
habituated to buying low-effort foods with a dump-and-stir
ability-threshold. If asked objectively whether these were good
things to be eating, let alone on any sort of regular basis, I would
have said, “No.” But I didn’t ask myself.
Eventually, without any significantly crippling health crisis
disarming me over the last few years, I’ve become more and more
aware of how my body reacts to certain foods, and it turns out that
most of the prepared, packaged foods make me feel gross. So, I
stopped buying them, or I would buy them only if the ingredient list
was low-sodium and additive-free. This went on for quite a while,
and I was happy with that, although still not entirely healthy. I
still watched fat content, and had a great deal of recipes
stockpiled that fit those parameters quite nicely. I was also still
suffering all sorts of minor signs of ill-health, but let me tell
you this: when you have been through such severe and traumatic
health episodes as I have, you sort of take for granted that you’re
always going to feel a little bit unwell. It took a jolt to get me
thinking and learning again, and it took another jolt to realize
that simply reducing pre-fab foods was insufficient to my goal of
getting my health back.
More recently, I have turned my attention to how my body produces
and processes insulin – a fundamental element of determining the
body’s metabolism. While I am not diabetic, I immediately started
researching insulin and diabetes, and learning a lot about blood
glucose levels. Pieces of the puzzle started falling into place, and
I learned how to better manage my nutrition.
I started with a fairly typical slash-and-burn approach to anything
involving any sort of added sugar. For a few weeks, these items were
strictly verboten, and I was surprised at how much hidden and added
sugar I was really ingesting. During this oddly Lenten fast, I did
some more research. I discovered that, in terms of blood glucose
levels (which determine how much insulin your body produces), there
were things far more detrimental to me than simple table sugar.
Refined wheat flour, for example. I had already gone through the
brands of store-bought bread and turfed any that bore the dreaded
words “glucose/fructose” in their ingredients, because I am deeply
suspicious of it from a health perspective. Now, I am discovering
that even breads made with 100% whole wheat flour are converted to
glucose very quickly in the body, prompting a large insulin surge.
This is not good news for someone trying to improve metabolism, but
all is not lost. In this case, there are pre-packaged convenience
foods that bridge the gap that the home-baker can’t easily fill.
Specifically, there are four kinds of breads that foil the body’s
attempts to convert it instantly to sugar: sourdough (ideally,
sourdough rye, but any sourdough will do) which has oddly acidic
properties that force the body to process it more slowly, whole
grain rye breads (preferably with grains showing), flourless
sprouted wheat breads (made from milled sprouted grains as opposed
to flour ground from dry kernels), and breads made from 100%
stone-ground flour (stone-ground flour particles are coarser, and
therefore digest more slowly).
I’ve run a strange gamut since starting this research, and putting
it into place – along with other dietary tweaks built on the same
information. I started off feeling quite reactionary, frustrated,
and a little scared, and ended up taking a very strategic, if not
downright pro-active approach, and feeling very encouraged. I’m
certainly not eating less food, I’m just exchanging some items for
better choices, or better versions of what I used to eat. I am not
willing to subscribe to a culture of deprivation. There isn’t
anything that I need to cut out of my life wholesale, but there are
types of food that I should be relying on more or less often.
What is surprising me most is that I’m finding that there are
pre-packaged foods that meet my needs, in some cases – such as the
bread – offering both far more convenience and variety than I would
be able to manage in my own kitchen. I’m not condemned to a culinary
life of never-ending lentils and brown rice. I still believe that
healthy eating involves preparing more meals “from scratch” and
being aware of fat and sugar content, but it’s nice to know that you
can still grab something from the store and feel good about it.
Plus, it turns out that pasta is good for me!
March 2006
PSSST!
Welcome to the brand new look for Always in the Kitchen. The new site was developed by Julie McGalliard, who sorted out my barely coherent ramblings about what I wanted, and developed the art and technical components for the entire site. Thanks, Julie!
The older pages will be brought into the new format gradually, as I find the time to do it. In the meantime, please be patient. Let me know if you find any broken links, or if the site is acting weird, though.
Always In the Kitchen
© 2003 —
2006
Dawna L. Read